{"title":"50岁以下患者的生物假体主动脉瓣置换术","authors":"Aisha O. Kazeem","doi":"10.22237/crp/1667261400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A clinical decision report using:\nChan V, Lam BK, Rubens FD, et al. Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.041 \nfor a patient considering reoperative aortic valve replacement.","PeriodicalId":10422,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioprosthetic reoperative aortic valve replacement in patients under 50\",\"authors\":\"Aisha O. Kazeem\",\"doi\":\"10.22237/crp/1667261400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A clinical decision report using:\\nChan V, Lam BK, Rubens FD, et al. Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.041 \\nfor a patient considering reoperative aortic valve replacement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22237/crp/1667261400\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/crp/1667261400","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bioprosthetic reoperative aortic valve replacement in patients under 50
A clinical decision report using:
Chan V, Lam BK, Rubens FD, et al. Long-term evaluation of biological versus mechanical prosthesis use at reoperative aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.08.041
for a patient considering reoperative aortic valve replacement.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
