{"title":"护士执业管理门诊诱导丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮妇女在怀孕期间阿片类药物使用障碍:回顾性队列分析","authors":"","doi":"10.24966/rmgo-2574/100036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Cohort Analysis. Abstract Objective: To compare maternal, fetal and neonatal clinical char- acteristics and outcomes of Nurse Practitioner managed outpatient induction and community induced transfers of buprenorphine/nalox-one treatment during pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients managed by nurse practitioner and treated with buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid use disorder during pregnancy and their neonates. N=319 moth- er-neonate dyads were treated at the University of North Carolina Horizons’ Clinic between January 1, 2014 and May 31, 2018. N=51 mother-neonate dyads that underwent buprenorphine/naloxone induction via the Horizons’ Clinic protocol versus n=44 mother-ne- onate dyads that underwent community buprenorphine/naloxone induction via an outside provider and transferred to Horizons’ for pre- natal care and management of Medications for Addiction Treatment (MAT) during pregnancy were compared. Demographic data; maternal, fetal, and neonatal clinical characteristics; and clinical outcomes were collected via chart review. Results: No significant differences were found in maternal clinical characteristics between the two groups. Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW) percentile was the only significantly different fetal outcome with the Horizons’ induction group having a significantly higher mean EFW percentile compared to those who underwent community induction (41.8vs. 35.7, P=0.042). Finally, no significant differences in preterm birth or low birth weight were found between Horizons’ induction group and the North Carolina state averages. Conclusion: The induction protocol utilized by the UNC Horizons prenatal clinic shows similar safety and efficacy in pregnancy out comes compared to community induced transfers. The outcomes for both groups indicate relative safety and effectiveness of buprenor-phine/naloxone during pregnancy. Nurse practitioner prescribing and outpatient protocols could help expand access to MAT by providing more options for patients. outcome variables were meant to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for mother, fetus and neonate before, during and after pregnancy. Findings suggest that rates of normal anatomy ultrasound screenings, percentage of FHR within normal limits, gestational age at birth, birth weight in grams, 1 and 5 minute APGAR scores, new born days in nursery, and rates of NAS requiring medication inter vention during pregnancy do not differ significantly between patients who underwent the Horizons’ induction and those who underwent community induction. Remarkably, the only significant difference in outcomes was positive: patients in the Horizons’ induction group had significantly higher EFW percentile compared to those who under went community induction (41.8 vs. 35.7, P=0.042). EFW is a mea sure of normal fetal growth and can be a predictor for LBW. is an exciting finding due to the high incidence of low birth weight among patients This study shows that buprenorphine/naloxone has relative safety and effectiveness during pregnancy regardless of induction in the clinic or in the community. With the exception of EFW percentile, these data do not evidence are","PeriodicalId":87233,"journal":{"name":"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine","volume":"140 3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse Practitioner Managed Outpatient Induction Onto Buprenorphine/Naloxonein Women With Opioid Use Disorder During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.24966/rmgo-2574/100036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Cohort Analysis. Abstract Objective: To compare maternal, fetal and neonatal clinical char- acteristics and outcomes of Nurse Practitioner managed outpatient induction and community induced transfers of buprenorphine/nalox-one treatment during pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients managed by nurse practitioner and treated with buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid use disorder during pregnancy and their neonates. N=319 moth- er-neonate dyads were treated at the University of North Carolina Horizons’ Clinic between January 1, 2014 and May 31, 2018. N=51 mother-neonate dyads that underwent buprenorphine/naloxone induction via the Horizons’ Clinic protocol versus n=44 mother-ne- onate dyads that underwent community buprenorphine/naloxone induction via an outside provider and transferred to Horizons’ for pre- natal care and management of Medications for Addiction Treatment (MAT) during pregnancy were compared. Demographic data; maternal, fetal, and neonatal clinical characteristics; and clinical outcomes were collected via chart review. Results: No significant differences were found in maternal clinical characteristics between the two groups. Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW) percentile was the only significantly different fetal outcome with the Horizons’ induction group having a significantly higher mean EFW percentile compared to those who underwent community induction (41.8vs. 35.7, P=0.042). Finally, no significant differences in preterm birth or low birth weight were found between Horizons’ induction group and the North Carolina state averages. Conclusion: The induction protocol utilized by the UNC Horizons prenatal clinic shows similar safety and efficacy in pregnancy out comes compared to community induced transfers. The outcomes for both groups indicate relative safety and effectiveness of buprenor-phine/naloxone during pregnancy. Nurse practitioner prescribing and outpatient protocols could help expand access to MAT by providing more options for patients. outcome variables were meant to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for mother, fetus and neonate before, during and after pregnancy. Findings suggest that rates of normal anatomy ultrasound screenings, percentage of FHR within normal limits, gestational age at birth, birth weight in grams, 1 and 5 minute APGAR scores, new born days in nursery, and rates of NAS requiring medication inter vention during pregnancy do not differ significantly between patients who underwent the Horizons’ induction and those who underwent community induction. Remarkably, the only significant difference in outcomes was positive: patients in the Horizons’ induction group had significantly higher EFW percentile compared to those who under went community induction (41.8 vs. 35.7, P=0.042). EFW is a mea sure of normal fetal growth and can be a predictor for LBW. is an exciting finding due to the high incidence of low birth weight among patients This study shows that buprenorphine/naloxone has relative safety and effectiveness during pregnancy regardless of induction in the clinic or in the community. With the exception of EFW percentile, these data do not evidence are\",\"PeriodicalId\":87233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\"140 3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24966/rmgo-2574/100036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24966/rmgo-2574/100036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
队列分析。摘要目的:比较执业护士管理的门诊诱导和社区诱导的孕期丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗转移的母婴临床特点和结局。方法:回顾性队列分析由执业护士管理并使用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮治疗妊娠期阿片类药物使用障碍的患者及其新生儿。2014年1月1日至2018年5月31日期间,北卡罗来纳大学地平线诊所对N=319个月龄新生儿进行了治疗。通过Horizons诊所方案接受丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮诱导的51对母亲-新生儿与通过外部提供者接受社区丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮诱导并在怀孕期间转移到Horizons进行产前护理和药物成瘾治疗(MAT)管理的44对母亲-新生儿进行比较。人口统计数据;产妇、胎儿和新生儿临床特征;通过图表回顾收集临床结果。结果:两组产妇临床特征无明显差异。估计胎儿体重(EFW)百分位数是唯一显著不同的胎儿结局,地平线诱导组的平均EFW百分位数明显高于社区诱导组(41.8比41.8)。35.7, P = 0.042)。最后,在地平线的诱导组和北卡罗来纳州的平均水平之间没有发现早产或低出生体重的显著差异。结论:UNC Horizons产前诊所采用的诱导方案与社区诱导转运相比,安全性和有效性相似。两组的结果表明孕期丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮的相对安全性和有效性。执业护士处方和门诊协议可以通过为患者提供更多的选择来帮助扩大MAT的使用范围。结果变量旨在证明在怀孕前、怀孕期间和怀孕后对母亲、胎儿和新生儿的安全性和有效性。研究结果表明,正常解剖超声筛查率、正常范围内FHR百分比、出生时胎龄、出生体重(克)、1分钟和5分钟APGAR评分、新生儿在幼儿园出生天数以及怀孕期间需要药物干预的NAS发生率在接受Horizons引产的患者和接受社区引产的患者之间没有显著差异。值得注意的是,结果的唯一显著差异是阳性的:地平线诱导组患者的EFW百分位数明显高于社区诱导组(41.8比35.7,P=0.042)。EFW是胎儿正常生长的一个指标,可以作为LBW的预测指标。该研究表明,丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮在妊娠期间无论在临床还是在社区引产均具有相对的安全性和有效性。除了EFW的百分位数外,这些数据没有证据表明
Nurse Practitioner Managed Outpatient Induction Onto Buprenorphine/Naloxonein Women With Opioid Use Disorder During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
A Cohort Analysis. Abstract Objective: To compare maternal, fetal and neonatal clinical char- acteristics and outcomes of Nurse Practitioner managed outpatient induction and community induced transfers of buprenorphine/nalox-one treatment during pregnancy. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of patients managed by nurse practitioner and treated with buprenorphine/naloxone for opioid use disorder during pregnancy and their neonates. N=319 moth- er-neonate dyads were treated at the University of North Carolina Horizons’ Clinic between January 1, 2014 and May 31, 2018. N=51 mother-neonate dyads that underwent buprenorphine/naloxone induction via the Horizons’ Clinic protocol versus n=44 mother-ne- onate dyads that underwent community buprenorphine/naloxone induction via an outside provider and transferred to Horizons’ for pre- natal care and management of Medications for Addiction Treatment (MAT) during pregnancy were compared. Demographic data; maternal, fetal, and neonatal clinical characteristics; and clinical outcomes were collected via chart review. Results: No significant differences were found in maternal clinical characteristics between the two groups. Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW) percentile was the only significantly different fetal outcome with the Horizons’ induction group having a significantly higher mean EFW percentile compared to those who underwent community induction (41.8vs. 35.7, P=0.042). Finally, no significant differences in preterm birth or low birth weight were found between Horizons’ induction group and the North Carolina state averages. Conclusion: The induction protocol utilized by the UNC Horizons prenatal clinic shows similar safety and efficacy in pregnancy out comes compared to community induced transfers. The outcomes for both groups indicate relative safety and effectiveness of buprenor-phine/naloxone during pregnancy. Nurse practitioner prescribing and outpatient protocols could help expand access to MAT by providing more options for patients. outcome variables were meant to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for mother, fetus and neonate before, during and after pregnancy. Findings suggest that rates of normal anatomy ultrasound screenings, percentage of FHR within normal limits, gestational age at birth, birth weight in grams, 1 and 5 minute APGAR scores, new born days in nursery, and rates of NAS requiring medication inter vention during pregnancy do not differ significantly between patients who underwent the Horizons’ induction and those who underwent community induction. Remarkably, the only significant difference in outcomes was positive: patients in the Horizons’ induction group had significantly higher EFW percentile compared to those who under went community induction (41.8 vs. 35.7, P=0.042). EFW is a mea sure of normal fetal growth and can be a predictor for LBW. is an exciting finding due to the high incidence of low birth weight among patients This study shows that buprenorphine/naloxone has relative safety and effectiveness during pregnancy regardless of induction in the clinic or in the community. With the exception of EFW percentile, these data do not evidence are