{"title":"有多少象形文字和多少文士?数字古文字和伏尼契手稿","authors":"L. Davis","doi":"10.1353/mns.2020.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:It can be safely claimed that there is no medieval script that has been seen, analyzed, and debated more than that of the mysterious and as-yet-unread Voynich Manuscript (Beinecke MS 408). For centuries, bibliophiles, linguists, codicologists, art historians, and amateur cryptologists have pored over the manuscript, examining it from every angle, debating every wormhole, arguing over every stain and crease. Some things we know: the invented script is comprised of carefully-written glyphs without precedent or obvious model; forensic material evidence has determined that the parchment, ink, and pigments date from the early 15th century; the provenance trail is nearly unbroken from the seventeenth century to today. But we still don't know how to read it, in spite of new theories flying across the internet on a near-weekly basis. \"Voynichologists\" disagree as to some of the most important and basic questions about the manuscript. How many letterforms are there? How many scribes can be identified? Are there ligatures, majuscules, abbreviations, and other scribal conventions? These questions have never been satisfactorily answered. Using digital paleographic methodologies including the Archetype (DigiPal) application and other annotation tools, this project will revisit the paleographic analyses of the Voynich glyphs to propose answers to some of these questions and discuss how these answers open avenues for further research.","PeriodicalId":40527,"journal":{"name":"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"164 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Many Glyphs and How Many Scribes? Digital Paleography and the Voynich Manuscript\",\"authors\":\"L. Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mns.2020.0011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:It can be safely claimed that there is no medieval script that has been seen, analyzed, and debated more than that of the mysterious and as-yet-unread Voynich Manuscript (Beinecke MS 408). For centuries, bibliophiles, linguists, codicologists, art historians, and amateur cryptologists have pored over the manuscript, examining it from every angle, debating every wormhole, arguing over every stain and crease. Some things we know: the invented script is comprised of carefully-written glyphs without precedent or obvious model; forensic material evidence has determined that the parchment, ink, and pigments date from the early 15th century; the provenance trail is nearly unbroken from the seventeenth century to today. But we still don't know how to read it, in spite of new theories flying across the internet on a near-weekly basis. \\\"Voynichologists\\\" disagree as to some of the most important and basic questions about the manuscript. How many letterforms are there? How many scribes can be identified? Are there ligatures, majuscules, abbreviations, and other scribal conventions? These questions have never been satisfactorily answered. Using digital paleographic methodologies including the Archetype (DigiPal) application and other annotation tools, this project will revisit the paleographic analyses of the Voynich glyphs to propose answers to some of these questions and discuss how these answers open avenues for further research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"164 - 180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2020.0011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manuscript Studies-A Journal of the Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mns.2020.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
摘要
摘要:可以肯定地说,没有一种中世纪手稿比神秘的、尚未读过的伏尼契手稿(Beinecke MS 408)被看到、分析和争论得更多。几个世纪以来,藏书家、语言学家、法典学家、艺术史学家和业余密码学家都在仔细研究手稿,从各个角度审视它,争论每一个虫洞,争论每一个污点和折痕。有些事情我们知道:发明的文字是由精心书写的符号组成的,没有先例或明显的模型;法医物证已经确定,羊皮纸、墨水和颜料可以追溯到15世纪初;从17世纪到今天,它的来源几乎没有中断过。但我们仍然不知道如何解读它,尽管几乎每周都会有新的理论在互联网上传播。“伏尼古学者”对手稿的一些最重要和最基本的问题意见不一。有多少字母形式?有多少抄写员可以确认?是否有结扎、大肌、缩略语和其他抄写惯例?这些问题从来没有得到令人满意的回答。本项目将使用数字古图学方法,包括原型(DigiPal)应用程序和其他注释工具,重新审视伏尼契字形的古图学分析,提出其中一些问题的答案,并讨论这些答案如何为进一步的研究开辟道路。
How Many Glyphs and How Many Scribes? Digital Paleography and the Voynich Manuscript
Abstract:It can be safely claimed that there is no medieval script that has been seen, analyzed, and debated more than that of the mysterious and as-yet-unread Voynich Manuscript (Beinecke MS 408). For centuries, bibliophiles, linguists, codicologists, art historians, and amateur cryptologists have pored over the manuscript, examining it from every angle, debating every wormhole, arguing over every stain and crease. Some things we know: the invented script is comprised of carefully-written glyphs without precedent or obvious model; forensic material evidence has determined that the parchment, ink, and pigments date from the early 15th century; the provenance trail is nearly unbroken from the seventeenth century to today. But we still don't know how to read it, in spite of new theories flying across the internet on a near-weekly basis. "Voynichologists" disagree as to some of the most important and basic questions about the manuscript. How many letterforms are there? How many scribes can be identified? Are there ligatures, majuscules, abbreviations, and other scribal conventions? These questions have never been satisfactorily answered. Using digital paleographic methodologies including the Archetype (DigiPal) application and other annotation tools, this project will revisit the paleographic analyses of the Voynich glyphs to propose answers to some of these questions and discuss how these answers open avenues for further research.