蓝色激光成像和放大内窥镜作为检测幽门螺杆菌感染粘膜的工具

Leal-Quiroga Ulises, Kane Abigail Sara, Mendoza-Fuerte Eduardo, Borjas-Almaguer Omar David, Leal Eugenia, Castañeda-Sepúlveda Rafael
{"title":"蓝色激光成像和放大内窥镜作为检测幽门螺杆菌感染粘膜的工具","authors":"Leal-Quiroga Ulises, Kane Abigail Sara, Mendoza-Fuerte Eduardo, Borjas-Almaguer Omar David, Leal Eugenia, Castañeda-Sepúlveda Rafael","doi":"10.23937/2378-3656/1410384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are multiple diagnostic methods for the detection of H. pylori; however, because most are not cost-effective and have low sensibility and specificity, gastric biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. H. pylori’s patchy distribution in the gastric mucosa requires multiple biopsy samples to accurately diagnose infection. This study’s objective is to identify the diagnostic value of using BLI-Bright with magnification endoscopy as a tool for guided biopsy sampling in patients with suspected H. pylori infection. Methods: This study was conducted by retrospective analysis of 200 case files of patients who underwent upper endoscopy at Christus Muguerza Hospital Sur in Monterrey, Mexico between August 2016 and June 2018. One hundred ninety-three patient files met the selection criteria. To establish the diagnostic significance of occupied/ unoccupied gastric pits, sensibility, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated based on histological findings. Results: Predicting H. pylori infection in occupied/ unoccupied pits has a sensitivity of 66.00%, specificity of 95.10%, a positive predictive value of 85.50%, and a negative predictive value of 88.89%. Analysis of gastric pits using BLI-Bright with magnification endoscopy is more sensitive and specific than rapid urease testing for the diagnosis of H. pylori. Conclusions: Given its relatively high negative predictive value, finding empty gastric pits suggests a low probability of finding H. pylori. Blue Laser Imaging (BLI)-Bright with magnification endoscopy is not a replacement for histologic examination, but rather a tool to help select potentially infected areas of the stomach based on the appearance of gastric pits.","PeriodicalId":10450,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blue Laser Imaging and Magnification Endoscopy as a Tool for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infected Mucosa\",\"authors\":\"Leal-Quiroga Ulises, Kane Abigail Sara, Mendoza-Fuerte Eduardo, Borjas-Almaguer Omar David, Leal Eugenia, Castañeda-Sepúlveda Rafael\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-3656/1410384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There are multiple diagnostic methods for the detection of H. pylori; however, because most are not cost-effective and have low sensibility and specificity, gastric biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. H. pylori’s patchy distribution in the gastric mucosa requires multiple biopsy samples to accurately diagnose infection. This study’s objective is to identify the diagnostic value of using BLI-Bright with magnification endoscopy as a tool for guided biopsy sampling in patients with suspected H. pylori infection. Methods: This study was conducted by retrospective analysis of 200 case files of patients who underwent upper endoscopy at Christus Muguerza Hospital Sur in Monterrey, Mexico between August 2016 and June 2018. One hundred ninety-three patient files met the selection criteria. To establish the diagnostic significance of occupied/ unoccupied gastric pits, sensibility, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated based on histological findings. Results: Predicting H. pylori infection in occupied/ unoccupied pits has a sensitivity of 66.00%, specificity of 95.10%, a positive predictive value of 85.50%, and a negative predictive value of 88.89%. Analysis of gastric pits using BLI-Bright with magnification endoscopy is more sensitive and specific than rapid urease testing for the diagnosis of H. pylori. Conclusions: Given its relatively high negative predictive value, finding empty gastric pits suggests a low probability of finding H. pylori. Blue Laser Imaging (BLI)-Bright with magnification endoscopy is not a replacement for histologic examination, but rather a tool to help select potentially infected areas of the stomach based on the appearance of gastric pits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3656/1410384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medical Reviews and Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3656/1410384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:幽门螺杆菌的诊断方法多种多样;然而,由于大多数方法成本不高,敏感性和特异性低,因此胃活检仍然是诊断的金标准。幽门螺杆菌在胃粘膜的斑片状分布需要多次活检才能准确诊断感染。本研究的目的是确定在疑似幽门螺杆菌感染的患者中,使用BLI-Bright和放大内窥镜作为引导活检取样的工具的诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2016年8月至2018年6月在墨西哥蒙特雷Christus Muguerza医院接受上内镜检查的200例患者的病例档案。193份患者档案符合入选标准。为了确定胃窝占位/未占位的诊断意义,根据组织学结果计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果:预测占用坑/未占用坑幽门螺杆菌感染的敏感性为66.00%,特异性为95.10%,阳性预测值为85.50%,阴性预测值为88.89%。BLI-Bright联合放大内镜检查胃凹比快速脲酶检测诊断幽门螺杆菌更敏感、更特异。结论:胃空窝阴性预测值较高,提示发现幽门螺杆菌的概率较低。蓝色激光成像(BLI)-明亮的放大内窥镜检查不是组织学检查的替代品,而是一种根据胃凹的外观帮助选择胃潜在感染区域的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blue Laser Imaging and Magnification Endoscopy as a Tool for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infected Mucosa
Background: There are multiple diagnostic methods for the detection of H. pylori; however, because most are not cost-effective and have low sensibility and specificity, gastric biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis. H. pylori’s patchy distribution in the gastric mucosa requires multiple biopsy samples to accurately diagnose infection. This study’s objective is to identify the diagnostic value of using BLI-Bright with magnification endoscopy as a tool for guided biopsy sampling in patients with suspected H. pylori infection. Methods: This study was conducted by retrospective analysis of 200 case files of patients who underwent upper endoscopy at Christus Muguerza Hospital Sur in Monterrey, Mexico between August 2016 and June 2018. One hundred ninety-three patient files met the selection criteria. To establish the diagnostic significance of occupied/ unoccupied gastric pits, sensibility, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated based on histological findings. Results: Predicting H. pylori infection in occupied/ unoccupied pits has a sensitivity of 66.00%, specificity of 95.10%, a positive predictive value of 85.50%, and a negative predictive value of 88.89%. Analysis of gastric pits using BLI-Bright with magnification endoscopy is more sensitive and specific than rapid urease testing for the diagnosis of H. pylori. Conclusions: Given its relatively high negative predictive value, finding empty gastric pits suggests a low probability of finding H. pylori. Blue Laser Imaging (BLI)-Bright with magnification endoscopy is not a replacement for histologic examination, but rather a tool to help select potentially infected areas of the stomach based on the appearance of gastric pits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信