125I粒子近距离放疗联合西妥昔单抗治疗直肠癌术后复发的近期疗效观察

Jian Wang, Zhang Xikun, Bin Wang, Shan-shan Li, Lin Sun, Wen Sun, Hao Liang, Niu Hongxin
{"title":"125I粒子近距离放疗联合西妥昔单抗治疗直肠癌术后复发的近期疗效观察","authors":"Jian Wang, Zhang Xikun, Bin Wang, Shan-shan Li, Lin Sun, Wen Sun, Hao Liang, Niu Hongxin","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo evaluate the short-term efficacy of combination of 125I seed brachytherapy and cetuximab in postoperation recurrent rectum cancer. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom July 2014 to June 2018, at Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 57 patients with postoperation recurrent rectal cancer were recruited. According to therapy the patients were divided into two groups: the radiotherapy group (30 cases) treated with radioactive 125I seeds alone and the combination treatment group (27 cases) treated with combination of radioactive 125I seeds and cetuximab. The tumor size, pain relief and adverse reactions were observed in both groups. Chi-square test were performed for statistical analysis. \n \n \nResults \nAfter treatment for six months, the total efficacy rate and local control rate of combination treatment group were 54.2% (13/24) and 87.5% (21/24), respectively; and which were higher than those of radiotherapy group (17.9%, 5/28 and 39.3%, 11/28), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=15.01 and 2.55, both P 0.05). After treatment for six months, the rates of adverse reactions of radiotherapy group and combination treatment group were 46.7% (14/30) and 63.0% (17/27), respectively, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The symptoms of patients with radiation injury significantly improved after symptomatic treatment. \n \n \nConclusion \nThe short-term efficacy of combination of 125I seed brachytherapy and cetuximab is better than that of 125I seed brachytherapy alone in patients with postoperation recurrent rectum cancer. \n \n \nKey words: \nRecurrent rectum cancer; 125I seeds; Cetuximab monoclonal antibody","PeriodicalId":10009,"journal":{"name":"中华消化杂志","volume":"9 1","pages":"337-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term efficacy of combination of 125I seed brachytherapy and cetuximab in postoperation recurrent rectum cancer\",\"authors\":\"Jian Wang, Zhang Xikun, Bin Wang, Shan-shan Li, Lin Sun, Wen Sun, Hao Liang, Niu Hongxin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.05.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo evaluate the short-term efficacy of combination of 125I seed brachytherapy and cetuximab in postoperation recurrent rectum cancer. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nFrom July 2014 to June 2018, at Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 57 patients with postoperation recurrent rectal cancer were recruited. According to therapy the patients were divided into two groups: the radiotherapy group (30 cases) treated with radioactive 125I seeds alone and the combination treatment group (27 cases) treated with combination of radioactive 125I seeds and cetuximab. The tumor size, pain relief and adverse reactions were observed in both groups. Chi-square test were performed for statistical analysis. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAfter treatment for six months, the total efficacy rate and local control rate of combination treatment group were 54.2% (13/24) and 87.5% (21/24), respectively; and which were higher than those of radiotherapy group (17.9%, 5/28 and 39.3%, 11/28), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=15.01 and 2.55, both P 0.05). After treatment for six months, the rates of adverse reactions of radiotherapy group and combination treatment group were 46.7% (14/30) and 63.0% (17/27), respectively, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The symptoms of patients with radiation injury significantly improved after symptomatic treatment. \\n \\n \\nConclusion \\nThe short-term efficacy of combination of 125I seed brachytherapy and cetuximab is better than that of 125I seed brachytherapy alone in patients with postoperation recurrent rectum cancer. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nRecurrent rectum cancer; 125I seeds; Cetuximab monoclonal antibody\",\"PeriodicalId\":10009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华消化杂志\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"337-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华消化杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.05.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华消化杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-1432.2019.05.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价125I粒子近距离放疗联合西妥昔单抗治疗直肠癌术后复发的近期疗效。方法选取2014年7月至2018年6月山东省医学科学院附属医院57例直肠癌术后复发患者。根据治疗方法将患者分为放疗组(30例)和联合治疗组(27例),分别采用放射性125I粒子单独治疗和放射性125I粒子联合西妥昔单抗治疗。观察两组患者肿瘤大小、疼痛缓解情况及不良反应。采用卡方检验进行统计学分析。结果治疗6个月后,联合治疗组总有效率为54.2%(13/24),局部控制率为87.5% (21/24);,高于放疗组(17.9%,5/28;39.3%,11/28),差异均有统计学意义(χ2=15.01、2.55,P均为0.05)。治疗6个月后,放疗组不良反应发生率为46.7%(14/30),联合治疗组不良反应发生率为63.0%(17/27),两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。放射损伤患者经对症治疗后症状明显改善。结论125I粒子联合西妥昔单抗治疗直肠癌术后复发的近期疗效优于125I粒子联合近距离放疗。关键词:复发性直肠癌;125我的种子;西妥昔单抗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-term efficacy of combination of 125I seed brachytherapy and cetuximab in postoperation recurrent rectum cancer
Objective To evaluate the short-term efficacy of combination of 125I seed brachytherapy and cetuximab in postoperation recurrent rectum cancer. Methods From July 2014 to June 2018, at Affiliated Hospital of Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 57 patients with postoperation recurrent rectal cancer were recruited. According to therapy the patients were divided into two groups: the radiotherapy group (30 cases) treated with radioactive 125I seeds alone and the combination treatment group (27 cases) treated with combination of radioactive 125I seeds and cetuximab. The tumor size, pain relief and adverse reactions were observed in both groups. Chi-square test were performed for statistical analysis. Results After treatment for six months, the total efficacy rate and local control rate of combination treatment group were 54.2% (13/24) and 87.5% (21/24), respectively; and which were higher than those of radiotherapy group (17.9%, 5/28 and 39.3%, 11/28), and the differences were statistically significant (χ2=15.01 and 2.55, both P 0.05). After treatment for six months, the rates of adverse reactions of radiotherapy group and combination treatment group were 46.7% (14/30) and 63.0% (17/27), respectively, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The symptoms of patients with radiation injury significantly improved after symptomatic treatment. Conclusion The short-term efficacy of combination of 125I seed brachytherapy and cetuximab is better than that of 125I seed brachytherapy alone in patients with postoperation recurrent rectum cancer. Key words: Recurrent rectum cancer; 125I seeds; Cetuximab monoclonal antibody
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8016
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信