{"title":"多元宇宙之争","authors":"Alejandro Gangui","doi":"10.31527/analesafa.2019.30.4.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a synthesis of the positions in the literature regarding controversies about the multiverse. After re-viewing some simple elements of modern cosmology and its observational limitations, we will present the history ofthe ideas that led, first, to the proposal of the anthropic principle and, years later, to the possible existence of causallydisconnected domains, eventually endowed with their own laws and fundamental constants, not all compatible with theexistence of observers, which were globally baptized with the confusing name of parallel universes or multiverse.","PeriodicalId":41478,"journal":{"name":"Anales AFA","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE MULTIVERSE CONTROVERSY\",\"authors\":\"Alejandro Gangui\",\"doi\":\"10.31527/analesafa.2019.30.4.72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper offers a synthesis of the positions in the literature regarding controversies about the multiverse. After re-viewing some simple elements of modern cosmology and its observational limitations, we will present the history ofthe ideas that led, first, to the proposal of the anthropic principle and, years later, to the possible existence of causallydisconnected domains, eventually endowed with their own laws and fundamental constants, not all compatible with theexistence of observers, which were globally baptized with the confusing name of parallel universes or multiverse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales AFA\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales AFA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31527/analesafa.2019.30.4.72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales AFA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31527/analesafa.2019.30.4.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper offers a synthesis of the positions in the literature regarding controversies about the multiverse. After re-viewing some simple elements of modern cosmology and its observational limitations, we will present the history ofthe ideas that led, first, to the proposal of the anthropic principle and, years later, to the possible existence of causallydisconnected domains, eventually endowed with their own laws and fundamental constants, not all compatible with theexistence of observers, which were globally baptized with the confusing name of parallel universes or multiverse.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
