消费者在家禽市场上选择的不同鸡肉的理化参数和感官属性

Meat Research Pub Date : 2022-04-29 DOI:10.55002/mr.2.2.16
A. Bostami, Mri Khan, A. Selim, M. Hossain, M. Khairunnesa
{"title":"消费者在家禽市场上选择的不同鸡肉的理化参数和感官属性","authors":"A. Bostami, Mri Khan, A. Selim, M. Hossain, M. Khairunnesa","doi":"10.55002/mr.2.2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Generally, consumers prefer the indigenous chicken meat compare to commercial chicken like sonali or broiler chicken because of their concept of having more nutritious and palatability and ready to pay more. Whether the concept is true or not, and on which aspects, indigenous chicken meat is superior compare to that of commercially reared chicken, validation is required. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to compare the carcass characteristics, meat proximate composition, physico-chemical parameters and sensory attributes of indigenous/deshi, sonali and broiler chicken that are available in the poultry market of Bangladesh. Three types of finisher chicken: indigenous/deshi, sonali and broiler chicken were bought from local market of Bangladesh. Birds were slaughtered following halal method; carcass traits and meat quality parameters were analyzed after collection and processing of meat samples. Result indicated that, there is a variation in the carcass characteristics, proximate composition, physico-chemical attributes and sensory evaluation. Broiler chicken live weight, slaughter weight and abdominal fat was higher as compared to sonali and indigenous/deshi chicken (P<0.05). The dry matter, crude protein and ether extract was higher in deshi chicken followed by sonali and broiler chicken (P<0.05). Drip loss and cooking loss was higher in broiler chicken followed by sonali and deshi chicken, while pH24 was lower in deshi chicken followed by sonali and broiler chicken (P<0.05). Broiler chicken meat was more tender in relation to sonali and deshi chicken (P<0.05), where flavor of deshi chicken meat was higher as compared to the broiler chicken (P<0.05). Result suggested that, based on level of status of people, consumers can choose indigenous or deshi chicken due to better proximate composition and meat flavour; however, sonali and broiler chicken are also acceptable by the consumers with higher carcass weight and meat tenderness with short interval to become marketable weight and cheap price which can be afford by all class of people to meet their protein demand, eventually can secure national human health.","PeriodicalId":18312,"journal":{"name":"Meat Research","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physico-chemical parameters and sensory attributes of different chicken meat of consumer’s choice from poultry market\",\"authors\":\"A. Bostami, Mri Khan, A. Selim, M. Hossain, M. Khairunnesa\",\"doi\":\"10.55002/mr.2.2.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Generally, consumers prefer the indigenous chicken meat compare to commercial chicken like sonali or broiler chicken because of their concept of having more nutritious and palatability and ready to pay more. Whether the concept is true or not, and on which aspects, indigenous chicken meat is superior compare to that of commercially reared chicken, validation is required. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to compare the carcass characteristics, meat proximate composition, physico-chemical parameters and sensory attributes of indigenous/deshi, sonali and broiler chicken that are available in the poultry market of Bangladesh. Three types of finisher chicken: indigenous/deshi, sonali and broiler chicken were bought from local market of Bangladesh. Birds were slaughtered following halal method; carcass traits and meat quality parameters were analyzed after collection and processing of meat samples. Result indicated that, there is a variation in the carcass characteristics, proximate composition, physico-chemical attributes and sensory evaluation. Broiler chicken live weight, slaughter weight and abdominal fat was higher as compared to sonali and indigenous/deshi chicken (P<0.05). The dry matter, crude protein and ether extract was higher in deshi chicken followed by sonali and broiler chicken (P<0.05). Drip loss and cooking loss was higher in broiler chicken followed by sonali and deshi chicken, while pH24 was lower in deshi chicken followed by sonali and broiler chicken (P<0.05). Broiler chicken meat was more tender in relation to sonali and deshi chicken (P<0.05), where flavor of deshi chicken meat was higher as compared to the broiler chicken (P<0.05). Result suggested that, based on level of status of people, consumers can choose indigenous or deshi chicken due to better proximate composition and meat flavour; however, sonali and broiler chicken are also acceptable by the consumers with higher carcass weight and meat tenderness with short interval to become marketable weight and cheap price which can be afford by all class of people to meet their protein demand, eventually can secure national human health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meat Research\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meat Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55002/mr.2.2.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55002/mr.2.2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

一般来说,与索纳利鸡或肉鸡等商业鸡肉相比,消费者更喜欢本土鸡肉,因为他们的概念更有营养、更美味,而且愿意花更多的钱。无论这个概念是否正确,以及在哪些方面,本土鸡肉比商业饲养的鸡肉更优越,都需要验证。因此,进行了一项试验,比较了孟加拉国家禽市场上可买到的土生/德士鸡、索纳利鸡和肉鸡的胴体特性、肉类近似成分、理化参数和感官属性。从孟加拉国当地市场购买了三种育肥鸡:土产/德士鸡、索纳利鸡和肉鸡。禽鸟按清真法屠宰;对肉样采集处理后的胴体性状和肉质参数进行分析。结果表明,在胴体特征、近似组成、理化性质和感官评价方面存在差异。肉鸡活重、屠宰重和腹部脂肪均高于索纳利鸡和土鸡(P<0.05)。德市鸡的干物质、粗蛋白质和粗脂肪含量最高,索纳利鸡次之,肉鸡次之(P<0.05)。滴水损失和蒸煮损失以肉鸡最高,其次是索纳利鸡和德士鸡,而pH24以德士鸡最低,其次是索纳利鸡和肉鸡(P<0.05)。肉鸡的肉质较索纳利鸡和德市鸡更嫩(P<0.05),德市鸡的风味度高于肉鸡(P<0.05)。结果表明,根据人们的地位水平,消费者可以选择土鸡或德市鸡,因为它们的近似成分和肉香味更好;而索纳利肉鸡和肉鸡也以较高的胴体重和肉嫩度为消费者所接受,间隔时间短,成为市场重量,价格低廉,各阶层人群都能负担得起,满足其蛋白质需求,最终保障国民健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physico-chemical parameters and sensory attributes of different chicken meat of consumer’s choice from poultry market
Generally, consumers prefer the indigenous chicken meat compare to commercial chicken like sonali or broiler chicken because of their concept of having more nutritious and palatability and ready to pay more. Whether the concept is true or not, and on which aspects, indigenous chicken meat is superior compare to that of commercially reared chicken, validation is required. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to compare the carcass characteristics, meat proximate composition, physico-chemical parameters and sensory attributes of indigenous/deshi, sonali and broiler chicken that are available in the poultry market of Bangladesh. Three types of finisher chicken: indigenous/deshi, sonali and broiler chicken were bought from local market of Bangladesh. Birds were slaughtered following halal method; carcass traits and meat quality parameters were analyzed after collection and processing of meat samples. Result indicated that, there is a variation in the carcass characteristics, proximate composition, physico-chemical attributes and sensory evaluation. Broiler chicken live weight, slaughter weight and abdominal fat was higher as compared to sonali and indigenous/deshi chicken (P<0.05). The dry matter, crude protein and ether extract was higher in deshi chicken followed by sonali and broiler chicken (P<0.05). Drip loss and cooking loss was higher in broiler chicken followed by sonali and deshi chicken, while pH24 was lower in deshi chicken followed by sonali and broiler chicken (P<0.05). Broiler chicken meat was more tender in relation to sonali and deshi chicken (P<0.05), where flavor of deshi chicken meat was higher as compared to the broiler chicken (P<0.05). Result suggested that, based on level of status of people, consumers can choose indigenous or deshi chicken due to better proximate composition and meat flavour; however, sonali and broiler chicken are also acceptable by the consumers with higher carcass weight and meat tenderness with short interval to become marketable weight and cheap price which can be afford by all class of people to meet their protein demand, eventually can secure national human health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信