印度独立75年:医生阅读医学和科学内容的能力是如何进化的?解读未满足需求、机会和未来方向的横断面调查

{"title":"印度独立75年:医生阅读医学和科学内容的能力是如何进化的?解读未满足需求、机会和未来方向的横断面调查","authors":"","doi":"10.35940/ijmh.a1516.099122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information is now a commodity that can be accessed, serviced, or traded with minimal effort and maximum ease. The Healthcare and Medical information news that keeps the provider and the receiver aware and updated about the diseases and its therapy is no different. However, that also comes with an issue of information overload for the humongous volumes of research in this field, coupled with increasing publications. As India celebrates its 75 years of Independence, we targeted to understand the evolution in the information access, consumption & utilization journey of the HCPs. A secondary research and pan India survey with 680 Healthcare professionals was conducted to uncover the trends and the evolution of healthcare information access over these years. MedShots figured as the top medical news aggregating platform, followed by MedScape. Educational/CME platforms are the preferred sources for gathering information and 64% of the respondents spent more than 10 minutes each day reading medical updates. 58.3% of respondents agreed that Digitalization and sharing of information through mobile applications is comfortable and 86.30% of survey respondents preferred content on Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations, with 57.1% also expecting such platforms to support clinical/therapeutic decision making. The results have reinforced the higher level of acceptance & adaptation in the HCPs towards digitalization of the information access. While the medical information/news aggregating platforms remain helpful in updating the knowledge of HCPs in clinical decision-making, the study provides future directions to make the experience of information access & consumption more integral to the knowledge journey of HCPs.","PeriodicalId":14104,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management and Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"75 Years of India’s Independence: How Have Doctors Evolved Reading Medical and Scientific Content? A Cross-Sectional Survey to Decipher Unmet Needs, Opportunities and Future Directions\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.35940/ijmh.a1516.099122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Information is now a commodity that can be accessed, serviced, or traded with minimal effort and maximum ease. The Healthcare and Medical information news that keeps the provider and the receiver aware and updated about the diseases and its therapy is no different. However, that also comes with an issue of information overload for the humongous volumes of research in this field, coupled with increasing publications. As India celebrates its 75 years of Independence, we targeted to understand the evolution in the information access, consumption & utilization journey of the HCPs. A secondary research and pan India survey with 680 Healthcare professionals was conducted to uncover the trends and the evolution of healthcare information access over these years. MedShots figured as the top medical news aggregating platform, followed by MedScape. Educational/CME platforms are the preferred sources for gathering information and 64% of the respondents spent more than 10 minutes each day reading medical updates. 58.3% of respondents agreed that Digitalization and sharing of information through mobile applications is comfortable and 86.30% of survey respondents preferred content on Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations, with 57.1% also expecting such platforms to support clinical/therapeutic decision making. The results have reinforced the higher level of acceptance & adaptation in the HCPs towards digitalization of the information access. While the medical information/news aggregating platforms remain helpful in updating the knowledge of HCPs in clinical decision-making, the study provides future directions to make the experience of information access & consumption more integral to the knowledge journey of HCPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management and Humanities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.a1516.099122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.a1516.099122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

信息现在是一种商品,可以以最小的努力和最大的便利来访问、服务或交易。医疗保健和医疗信息新闻使提供者和接受者了解和更新疾病及其治疗也不例外。然而,这也带来了信息超载的问题,因为这一领域的研究数量庞大,加上出版物越来越多。在印度庆祝其独立75周年之际,我们的目标是了解hcp在信息获取、消费和利用过程中的演变。对680名医疗保健专业人员进行了二次研究和全印度调查,以揭示这些年来医疗保健信息访问的趋势和演变。MedShots是排名第一的医疗新闻聚合平台,MedScape紧随其后。教育/CME平台是收集信息的首选来源,64%的受访者每天花费超过10分钟阅读医疗更新。58.3%的受访者认为通过移动应用程序进行数字化和信息共享是舒适的,86.30%的受访者更喜欢临床实践指南和建议的内容,57.1%的受访者也希望这些平台支持临床/治疗决策。研究结果增强了医护人员对信息获取数字化的接受和适应程度。虽然医疗信息/新闻聚合平台在临床决策中对医护人员的知识更新仍有帮助,但本研究提供了未来的方向,使信息获取和消费体验更加融入医护人员的知识旅程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
75 Years of India’s Independence: How Have Doctors Evolved Reading Medical and Scientific Content? A Cross-Sectional Survey to Decipher Unmet Needs, Opportunities and Future Directions
Information is now a commodity that can be accessed, serviced, or traded with minimal effort and maximum ease. The Healthcare and Medical information news that keeps the provider and the receiver aware and updated about the diseases and its therapy is no different. However, that also comes with an issue of information overload for the humongous volumes of research in this field, coupled with increasing publications. As India celebrates its 75 years of Independence, we targeted to understand the evolution in the information access, consumption & utilization journey of the HCPs. A secondary research and pan India survey with 680 Healthcare professionals was conducted to uncover the trends and the evolution of healthcare information access over these years. MedShots figured as the top medical news aggregating platform, followed by MedScape. Educational/CME platforms are the preferred sources for gathering information and 64% of the respondents spent more than 10 minutes each day reading medical updates. 58.3% of respondents agreed that Digitalization and sharing of information through mobile applications is comfortable and 86.30% of survey respondents preferred content on Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations, with 57.1% also expecting such platforms to support clinical/therapeutic decision making. The results have reinforced the higher level of acceptance & adaptation in the HCPs towards digitalization of the information access. While the medical information/news aggregating platforms remain helpful in updating the knowledge of HCPs in clinical decision-making, the study provides future directions to make the experience of information access & consumption more integral to the knowledge journey of HCPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信