利用监督最近邻算法从电缆测井资料间接估计碎屑储层岩石粒度:初步结果

F. Anifowose, M. Mezghani, Saeed Saad Shahrani
{"title":"利用监督最近邻算法从电缆测井资料间接估计碎屑储层岩石粒度:初步结果","authors":"F. Anifowose, M. Mezghani, Saeed Saad Shahrani","doi":"10.2118/205156-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir rock textural properties such as grain size are typically estimated by direct visual observation of the physical texture of core samples. Grain size is one of the important inputs to petrophysical characterization, sedimentological facies classification, identification of depositional environments, and saturation models. A continuous log of grain size distribution over targeted reservoir sections is usually required for these applications. Core descriptions are typically not available over an entire targeted reservoir section. Physical core data may also be damaged during retrieval or due to plugging.\n Alternative methods proposed in literature are not sustainable due to their limitations in terms of input data requirements and inflexibility to apply them in environments with different geological settings. This paper presents the preliminary results of our investigation of a new methodology based on machine learning technology to complement and enhance the traditional core description and the alternative methods. We developed and optimized supervised machine learning models comprising K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), and decision tree (DT) to indirectly estimate reservoir rock grain size for a new well or targeted reservoir sections from historical wireline logs and archival core descriptions.\n We used anonymized datasets consisting of nine wells from a clastic reservoir. Seven of the wells were used to train and optimize the models while the remaining two were reserved for validation. The grain size types range from clay to pebbles. The performance of the models confirmed the feasibility of this approach. The KNN, SVM, and DT models demonstrated the capability to estimate the grain size for the test wells by matching actual data with a minimum of 60% and close to 80% accuracy. This is an accomplishment taking into account the uncertainties inherent in the core analysis data. Further analysis of the results showed that the KNN model is the most accurate in performance compared to the other models.\n For future studies, we will explore more advanced classification algorithms and implement new class labeling strategies to improve the accuracy of this methodology. The attainment of this objective will further help to handle the complexity in the grain size estimation challenge and reduce the current turnaround time for core description.","PeriodicalId":10904,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","volume":"346 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indirect Estimation of Clastic Reservoir Rock Grain Size from Wireline Logs Using a Supervised Nearest Neighbor Algorithm: Preliminary Results\",\"authors\":\"F. Anifowose, M. Mezghani, Saeed Saad Shahrani\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/205156-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Reservoir rock textural properties such as grain size are typically estimated by direct visual observation of the physical texture of core samples. Grain size is one of the important inputs to petrophysical characterization, sedimentological facies classification, identification of depositional environments, and saturation models. A continuous log of grain size distribution over targeted reservoir sections is usually required for these applications. Core descriptions are typically not available over an entire targeted reservoir section. Physical core data may also be damaged during retrieval or due to plugging.\\n Alternative methods proposed in literature are not sustainable due to their limitations in terms of input data requirements and inflexibility to apply them in environments with different geological settings. This paper presents the preliminary results of our investigation of a new methodology based on machine learning technology to complement and enhance the traditional core description and the alternative methods. We developed and optimized supervised machine learning models comprising K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), and decision tree (DT) to indirectly estimate reservoir rock grain size for a new well or targeted reservoir sections from historical wireline logs and archival core descriptions.\\n We used anonymized datasets consisting of nine wells from a clastic reservoir. Seven of the wells were used to train and optimize the models while the remaining two were reserved for validation. The grain size types range from clay to pebbles. The performance of the models confirmed the feasibility of this approach. The KNN, SVM, and DT models demonstrated the capability to estimate the grain size for the test wells by matching actual data with a minimum of 60% and close to 80% accuracy. This is an accomplishment taking into account the uncertainties inherent in the core analysis data. Further analysis of the results showed that the KNN model is the most accurate in performance compared to the other models.\\n For future studies, we will explore more advanced classification algorithms and implement new class labeling strategies to improve the accuracy of this methodology. The attainment of this objective will further help to handle the complexity in the grain size estimation challenge and reduce the current turnaround time for core description.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021\",\"volume\":\"346 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/205156-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/205156-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

储层岩石的结构性质,如粒度,通常是通过直接观察岩心样品的物理结构来估计的。粒度是岩石物性表征、沉积相分类、沉积环境识别和饱和度模型的重要输入之一。在这些应用中,通常需要对目标储层段的粒度分布进行连续测井。通常无法获得整个目标油藏段的岩心描述。物理岩心数据也可能在检索过程中或由于堵塞而损坏。文献中提出的替代方法是不可持续的,因为它们在输入数据要求方面的局限性和在不同地质环境中应用它们的不灵活性。本文介绍了我们对一种基于机器学习技术的新方法的初步研究结果,以补充和增强传统的核心描述和替代方法。我们开发并优化了监督机器学习模型,该模型包括k -最近邻(KNN)、支持向量机(SVM)和决策树(DT),通过历史电缆测井和存档岩心描述间接估计新井或目标油藏段的储层岩石粒度。我们使用了由碎屑储层的9口井组成的匿名数据集。其中7口井用于训练和优化模型,其余2口井用于验证。粒度类型从粘土到鹅卵石不等。模型的性能验证了该方法的可行性。KNN、SVM和DT模型证明了通过匹配实际数据来估计测试井粒度的能力,其精度至少为60%,接近80%。这是一项考虑到核心分析数据中固有不确定性的成就。进一步分析结果表明,与其他模型相比,KNN模型在性能上是最准确的。在未来的研究中,我们将探索更先进的分类算法,并实施新的类别标注策略,以提高该方法的准确性。这一目标的实现将进一步有助于处理粒度估计挑战中的复杂性,并减少当前核心描述的周转时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indirect Estimation of Clastic Reservoir Rock Grain Size from Wireline Logs Using a Supervised Nearest Neighbor Algorithm: Preliminary Results
Reservoir rock textural properties such as grain size are typically estimated by direct visual observation of the physical texture of core samples. Grain size is one of the important inputs to petrophysical characterization, sedimentological facies classification, identification of depositional environments, and saturation models. A continuous log of grain size distribution over targeted reservoir sections is usually required for these applications. Core descriptions are typically not available over an entire targeted reservoir section. Physical core data may also be damaged during retrieval or due to plugging. Alternative methods proposed in literature are not sustainable due to their limitations in terms of input data requirements and inflexibility to apply them in environments with different geological settings. This paper presents the preliminary results of our investigation of a new methodology based on machine learning technology to complement and enhance the traditional core description and the alternative methods. We developed and optimized supervised machine learning models comprising K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machines (SVM), and decision tree (DT) to indirectly estimate reservoir rock grain size for a new well or targeted reservoir sections from historical wireline logs and archival core descriptions. We used anonymized datasets consisting of nine wells from a clastic reservoir. Seven of the wells were used to train and optimize the models while the remaining two were reserved for validation. The grain size types range from clay to pebbles. The performance of the models confirmed the feasibility of this approach. The KNN, SVM, and DT models demonstrated the capability to estimate the grain size for the test wells by matching actual data with a minimum of 60% and close to 80% accuracy. This is an accomplishment taking into account the uncertainties inherent in the core analysis data. Further analysis of the results showed that the KNN model is the most accurate in performance compared to the other models. For future studies, we will explore more advanced classification algorithms and implement new class labeling strategies to improve the accuracy of this methodology. The attainment of this objective will further help to handle the complexity in the grain size estimation challenge and reduce the current turnaround time for core description.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信