A comparison between opening total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy and traditional anterior approach on tension-free repair of inguinal hernia

Objective To evaluate the effects of the two different operations, such as open total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy or traditional anterior approachs on tension-free repair of inguinal hernia. Methods In a prospective randomized controlled study, 165 cases with inguinal hernia were allocated randomly to either the anterior approach group (82 cases)or open total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy group( 83 cases ).The index including the operation time, hospital stay, mean expense, time for returning to normal activity,and the recent or long-term operative complications and recurrence rate, were observed to evaluate the curative effect of open total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy approach. Results The follow-up rate were 98.79% ,after (20.52 ± 1.54) months in average follow-up in the anterior approach group and (21.63 ± 1.76) months in the TEP group, and no significant differences were recorded between the two groups in the operation time, hospital stay, time for returning to normal activity, recurrence rate(3.66% vs 1.22% ) and urinary retention ( P > 0. 05 ), but operative complications in TEP group were significantly less than that in anterior approach group (P< 0.05). Conclusions The operative complications or postoperative unwell decrease significantly through the open total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy approach in repairing inguinal hernias. Its curative effect was confirmed and deserves to be clinically popularized. Key words: Inguinal hernia;  Tension-free repair;  Total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy