雷氏症候群。49例推定病例诊断的重新评估。

M. Gauthier, J. Guay, J. Lacroix, A. Lortie
{"title":"雷氏症候群。49例推定病例诊断的重新评估。","authors":"M. Gauthier, J. Guay, J. Lacroix, A. Lortie","doi":"10.1001/ARCHPEDI.1989.02150220079023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We retrospectively studied 49 patients who were discharged from Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Canada, or who died between 1970 and 1987 with a presumptive diagnosis of Reye's syndrome. Reye's syndrome was defined as certain, probable, unlikely, or excluded according to clinical, biological, and histologic criteria agreed on a priori by a panel of experts. Patient charts were reviewed blindly by three clinicians. Assessments were similar in 42 cases (86%) (weighted K = 0.78 to 0.85, which suggested substantial agreement); for the remainder, agreement was reached after discussion. Reye's syndrome was considered certain in 1 case (2%), probable in 11 (22%), unlikely in 21 (43%), and excluded in 15 (31%). Four children in the study group did not undergo biopsy or autopsy; in three of these, Reye's syndrome was unlikely according to clinical and biological criteria, and in one, the diagnosis was unclassifiable. The incidence of certain or probable Reye's syndrome was low in our institution during the study period. Our results suggest that the apparent disappearance of Reye's syndrome should be reassessed.","PeriodicalId":7654,"journal":{"name":"American journal of diseases of children","volume":"1 1","pages":"1181-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reye's syndrome. A reappraisal of diagnosis in 49 presumptive cases.\",\"authors\":\"M. Gauthier, J. Guay, J. Lacroix, A. Lortie\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/ARCHPEDI.1989.02150220079023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We retrospectively studied 49 patients who were discharged from Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Canada, or who died between 1970 and 1987 with a presumptive diagnosis of Reye's syndrome. Reye's syndrome was defined as certain, probable, unlikely, or excluded according to clinical, biological, and histologic criteria agreed on a priori by a panel of experts. Patient charts were reviewed blindly by three clinicians. Assessments were similar in 42 cases (86%) (weighted K = 0.78 to 0.85, which suggested substantial agreement); for the remainder, agreement was reached after discussion. Reye's syndrome was considered certain in 1 case (2%), probable in 11 (22%), unlikely in 21 (43%), and excluded in 15 (31%). Four children in the study group did not undergo biopsy or autopsy; in three of these, Reye's syndrome was unlikely according to clinical and biological criteria, and in one, the diagnosis was unclassifiable. The incidence of certain or probable Reye's syndrome was low in our institution during the study period. Our results suggest that the apparent disappearance of Reye's syndrome should be reassessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of diseases of children\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1181-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of diseases of children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHPEDI.1989.02150220079023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of diseases of children","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHPEDI.1989.02150220079023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

我们回顾性研究了49例从加拿大蒙特利尔的Sainte-Justine医院出院或在1970年至1987年间死亡的推定诊断为Reye综合征的患者。雷氏综合征被定义为确定的,可能的,不太可能的,或排除根据临床,生物学和组织学标准,由专家小组商定的先验。三名临床医生盲目地审查了病人的病历。42例(86%)的评估结果相似(加权K = 0.78至0.85,这表明基本一致);剩下的部分,经过讨论达成了一致。Reye综合征1例(2%)确定,11例(22%)可能,21例(43%)不可能,15例(31%)排除。研究组中有4名儿童没有接受活检或尸检;根据临床和生物学标准,其中三个病例的雷氏综合征不太可能出现,其中一个病例的诊断结果无法分类。在研究期间,本院某些或可能的雷氏综合征发生率较低。我们的结果表明,Reye综合征的明显消失应该重新评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reye's syndrome. A reappraisal of diagnosis in 49 presumptive cases.
We retrospectively studied 49 patients who were discharged from Sainte-Justine Hospital, Montreal, Canada, or who died between 1970 and 1987 with a presumptive diagnosis of Reye's syndrome. Reye's syndrome was defined as certain, probable, unlikely, or excluded according to clinical, biological, and histologic criteria agreed on a priori by a panel of experts. Patient charts were reviewed blindly by three clinicians. Assessments were similar in 42 cases (86%) (weighted K = 0.78 to 0.85, which suggested substantial agreement); for the remainder, agreement was reached after discussion. Reye's syndrome was considered certain in 1 case (2%), probable in 11 (22%), unlikely in 21 (43%), and excluded in 15 (31%). Four children in the study group did not undergo biopsy or autopsy; in three of these, Reye's syndrome was unlikely according to clinical and biological criteria, and in one, the diagnosis was unclassifiable. The incidence of certain or probable Reye's syndrome was low in our institution during the study period. Our results suggest that the apparent disappearance of Reye's syndrome should be reassessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信