在开发操作员辅助、自动功能和自动机器时,利用最佳控制和物理测量

B. Frank
{"title":"在开发操作员辅助、自动功能和自动机器时,利用最佳控制和物理测量","authors":"B. Frank","doi":"10.1109/ICCSCE.2016.7893555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A method using optimal control results as input to operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous construction machine control is presented. This method complements the vast research within autonomy to achieve the most fuel efficient solution from results that are already available from concept evaluation and system optimization in early development. The optimal control results are validated and compared to an extensive empirical study to ensure realization in real applications. The optimal control method is based on dynamic programming and finds the global optimum in regards to fuel efficiency [ton/l] at a given productivity [ton/h]. The wheel loader is used as an example due to the complex nature of the system, where the driveline and working hydraulics must work together throughout the work cycle. The main focus in this paper is how to transfer results from the optimal control calculations done offline, with high computational power, to algorithms that can be used online in operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous machine control. The primary result is that the method and algorithms presented in this paper works. The secondary results is that the optimal control solution shows around 15% higher fuel efficiency compared to the highest fuel efficiency measured among real operators in the extensive empirical measurement. The operator with the highest measured fuel efficiency has 20–30% higher average fuel efficiency than the fleet implying that the optimal control results, if used in operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous machine control, can increase the average fleet fuel efficiency by up to 35–45%, depending on operator and application.","PeriodicalId":6540,"journal":{"name":"2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)","volume":"82 1","pages":"113-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing optimal control and physical measurements when developing operator assist, automatic functions and autonomous machines\",\"authors\":\"B. Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCSCE.2016.7893555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A method using optimal control results as input to operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous construction machine control is presented. This method complements the vast research within autonomy to achieve the most fuel efficient solution from results that are already available from concept evaluation and system optimization in early development. The optimal control results are validated and compared to an extensive empirical study to ensure realization in real applications. The optimal control method is based on dynamic programming and finds the global optimum in regards to fuel efficiency [ton/l] at a given productivity [ton/h]. The wheel loader is used as an example due to the complex nature of the system, where the driveline and working hydraulics must work together throughout the work cycle. The main focus in this paper is how to transfer results from the optimal control calculations done offline, with high computational power, to algorithms that can be used online in operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous machine control. The primary result is that the method and algorithms presented in this paper works. The secondary results is that the optimal control solution shows around 15% higher fuel efficiency compared to the highest fuel efficiency measured among real operators in the extensive empirical measurement. The operator with the highest measured fuel efficiency has 20–30% higher average fuel efficiency than the fleet implying that the optimal control results, if used in operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous machine control, can increase the average fleet fuel efficiency by up to 35–45%, depending on operator and application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"113-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSCE.2016.7893555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSCE.2016.7893555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

提出了一种将最优控制结果作为操作员辅助系统、自动功能和施工机械自主控制输入的方法。这种方法是对自主领域大量研究的补充,可以从早期开发阶段的概念评估和系统优化中获得最省油的解决方案。为确保在实际应用中实现,对最优控制结果进行了验证和比较。最优控制方法基于动态规划,在给定的生产率[吨/小时]下,以燃油效率[吨/升]为全局最优。由于轮式装载机系统的复杂性,在整个工作周期中,传动系统和工作液压系统必须协同工作,因此以轮式装载机为例。本文的主要重点是如何将具有高计算能力的离线最优控制计算结果转化为可在线用于操作员辅助系统,自动功能和自主机器控制的算法。初步结果表明,本文提出的方法和算法是有效的。第二个结果是,与实际操作人员在广泛的经验测量中测量到的最高燃油效率相比,最优控制方案的燃油效率提高了约15%。燃油效率最高的操作人员的平均燃油效率比车队高20-30%,这意味着,如果将最优控制结果用于操作人员辅助系统、自动功能和自动机器控制,根据操作人员和应用情况,平均燃油效率可提高35-45%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing optimal control and physical measurements when developing operator assist, automatic functions and autonomous machines
A method using optimal control results as input to operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous construction machine control is presented. This method complements the vast research within autonomy to achieve the most fuel efficient solution from results that are already available from concept evaluation and system optimization in early development. The optimal control results are validated and compared to an extensive empirical study to ensure realization in real applications. The optimal control method is based on dynamic programming and finds the global optimum in regards to fuel efficiency [ton/l] at a given productivity [ton/h]. The wheel loader is used as an example due to the complex nature of the system, where the driveline and working hydraulics must work together throughout the work cycle. The main focus in this paper is how to transfer results from the optimal control calculations done offline, with high computational power, to algorithms that can be used online in operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous machine control. The primary result is that the method and algorithms presented in this paper works. The secondary results is that the optimal control solution shows around 15% higher fuel efficiency compared to the highest fuel efficiency measured among real operators in the extensive empirical measurement. The operator with the highest measured fuel efficiency has 20–30% higher average fuel efficiency than the fleet implying that the optimal control results, if used in operator assist systems, automatic functions and autonomous machine control, can increase the average fleet fuel efficiency by up to 35–45%, depending on operator and application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信