克里斯蒂娜·卡梅伦,《认识世界遗产的关联价值》

Q2 Arts and Humanities
{"title":"克里斯蒂娜·卡梅伦,《认识世界遗产的关联价值》","authors":"","doi":"10.37710/plural.v8i1_3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increased interest in the commemoration of sites of memory, including battlefields and sites of genocide, UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre commissioned an expert study in 2018 to clarify the way criterion (vi) is applied to recognize the associative values at nominated properties. The study was intended to facilitate knowledge-based decision-making for properties with strong associative values. This paper outlines the lack of clarity and the World Heritage Committee’s concerns about the definition and application of criterion (vi). After documenting the evolution in the wording of criterion (vi), the article explains the important contribution of the 2018 report, in particular its analysis of 240 statements of Outstanding Universal Value that have used criterion (vi). It concludes that further studies should focus on the analysis of\nthe 240 World Heritage sites using precedents from previous inscriptions and case studies to theorize the six associations of criterion (vi), namely events, living traditions, ideas, beliefs, artistic works and literary works. Such research should also address methodologies for protecting and managing the attributes of associative values. These additional studies would support more consistent and knowledgeable use of criterion (vi) and thereby enhance the recognition and protection of associative values at World Heritage sites.","PeriodicalId":36611,"journal":{"name":"Plural. History. Culture. Society","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Christina Cameron, Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.37710/plural.v8i1_3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the increased interest in the commemoration of sites of memory, including battlefields and sites of genocide, UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre commissioned an expert study in 2018 to clarify the way criterion (vi) is applied to recognize the associative values at nominated properties. The study was intended to facilitate knowledge-based decision-making for properties with strong associative values. This paper outlines the lack of clarity and the World Heritage Committee’s concerns about the definition and application of criterion (vi). After documenting the evolution in the wording of criterion (vi), the article explains the important contribution of the 2018 report, in particular its analysis of 240 statements of Outstanding Universal Value that have used criterion (vi). It concludes that further studies should focus on the analysis of\\nthe 240 World Heritage sites using precedents from previous inscriptions and case studies to theorize the six associations of criterion (vi), namely events, living traditions, ideas, beliefs, artistic works and literary works. Such research should also address methodologies for protecting and managing the attributes of associative values. These additional studies would support more consistent and knowledgeable use of criterion (vi) and thereby enhance the recognition and protection of associative values at World Heritage sites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plural. History. Culture. Society\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plural. History. Culture. Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37710/plural.v8i1_3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plural. History. Culture. Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37710/plural.v8i1_3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人们对纪念包括战场和种族灭绝遗址在内的历史遗迹的兴趣日益浓厚,教科文组织世界遗产中心于2018年委托进行了一项专家研究,以澄清如何应用标准(vi)来识别提名遗产的关联价值。该研究旨在促进对具有强关联价值的属性进行基于知识的决策。本文概述了标准(vi)的定义和应用缺乏明确性以及世界遗产委员会的担忧。在记录了标准(vi)措辞的演变之后,文章解释了2018年报告的重要贡献。特别是对240项使用标准(vi)的突出普遍价值声明的分析。结论是,进一步的研究应侧重于分析240处世界遗产地,利用以往铭文的先例和案例研究,将标准(vi)的六种关联(即事件、生活传统、思想、信仰、艺术作品和文学作品)理论化。这种研究还应涉及保护和管理关联值属性的方法。这些额外的研究将支持更一致和更有知识地使用标准(vi),从而加强对世界遗产地相关价值的认识和保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Christina Cameron, Recognizing Associative Values in World Heritage
With the increased interest in the commemoration of sites of memory, including battlefields and sites of genocide, UNESCO’s World Heritage Centre commissioned an expert study in 2018 to clarify the way criterion (vi) is applied to recognize the associative values at nominated properties. The study was intended to facilitate knowledge-based decision-making for properties with strong associative values. This paper outlines the lack of clarity and the World Heritage Committee’s concerns about the definition and application of criterion (vi). After documenting the evolution in the wording of criterion (vi), the article explains the important contribution of the 2018 report, in particular its analysis of 240 statements of Outstanding Universal Value that have used criterion (vi). It concludes that further studies should focus on the analysis of the 240 World Heritage sites using precedents from previous inscriptions and case studies to theorize the six associations of criterion (vi), namely events, living traditions, ideas, beliefs, artistic works and literary works. Such research should also address methodologies for protecting and managing the attributes of associative values. These additional studies would support more consistent and knowledgeable use of criterion (vi) and thereby enhance the recognition and protection of associative values at World Heritage sites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plural. History. Culture. Society
Plural. History. Culture. Society Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信