人类胚胎中神经褶皱的两个融合部位和两个神经孔。

Teratology Pub Date : 2002-04-01 DOI:10.1002/TERA.10007
R. O'rahilly, F. Müller
{"title":"人类胚胎中神经褶皱的两个融合部位和两个神经孔。","authors":"R. O'rahilly, F. Müller","doi":"10.1002/TERA.10007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nSince reports on a pattern of multiple sites of fusion of the neural folds in the mouse appeared, it has been widely assumed that a similar pattern must be valid for the human. In the absence of embryological evidence, claims have been made that such a pattern can be discerned by classifying neural tube defects.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe neural folds and tube, as well as the neuropores, were reassessed in 98 human embryos of Stages 8-13; 61 were controlled by precise graphic reconstructions.\n\n\nRESULTS\nCareful study of an extensive series of staged human embryos shows that two de novo sites of fusion of the neural folds appear in succession: alpha in the rhombencephalic region and beta in the prosencephalic region, adjacent to the chiasmatic plate. Fusion from Site alpha proceeds bidirectionally (rostrad and caudad), whereas that from beta is unidirectional (caudad only). The fusions terminate in neuropores, of which there are two: rostral and caudal. Highly variable accessory loci of fusion, without positional stability and of unknown frequency, may be encountered in Stage 10 but seemingly not later, and their existence has been known for more than half a century.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nTwo sites of fusion (a term preferred to closure) of the neural folds and two neuropores are found in the human embryo. No convincing embryological evidence of a pattern of multiple sites of fusion, such as has been described in the mouse, is available for the human. The construction of embryological details from information derived from other species or from the examination of later anomalies is liable to error. Neural tube defects are reviewed and although they have been considered on the basis of five, four, or three sites of fusion, interpretations based on two sites can as readily be envisaged.","PeriodicalId":22211,"journal":{"name":"Teratology","volume":"83 1","pages":"162-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"138","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The two sites of fusion of the neural folds and the two neuropores in the human embryo.\",\"authors\":\"R. O'rahilly, F. Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/TERA.10007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nSince reports on a pattern of multiple sites of fusion of the neural folds in the mouse appeared, it has been widely assumed that a similar pattern must be valid for the human. In the absence of embryological evidence, claims have been made that such a pattern can be discerned by classifying neural tube defects.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nThe neural folds and tube, as well as the neuropores, were reassessed in 98 human embryos of Stages 8-13; 61 were controlled by precise graphic reconstructions.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nCareful study of an extensive series of staged human embryos shows that two de novo sites of fusion of the neural folds appear in succession: alpha in the rhombencephalic region and beta in the prosencephalic region, adjacent to the chiasmatic plate. Fusion from Site alpha proceeds bidirectionally (rostrad and caudad), whereas that from beta is unidirectional (caudad only). The fusions terminate in neuropores, of which there are two: rostral and caudal. Highly variable accessory loci of fusion, without positional stability and of unknown frequency, may be encountered in Stage 10 but seemingly not later, and their existence has been known for more than half a century.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nTwo sites of fusion (a term preferred to closure) of the neural folds and two neuropores are found in the human embryo. No convincing embryological evidence of a pattern of multiple sites of fusion, such as has been described in the mouse, is available for the human. The construction of embryological details from information derived from other species or from the examination of later anomalies is liable to error. Neural tube defects are reviewed and although they have been considered on the basis of five, four, or three sites of fusion, interpretations based on two sites can as readily be envisaged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teratology\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"162-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"138\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teratology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/TERA.10007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/TERA.10007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 138

摘要

背景:自从关于小鼠神经折叠多位点融合模式的报道出现以来,人们普遍认为类似的模式也适用于人类。在缺乏胚胎学证据的情况下,有人声称这种模式可以通过分类神经管缺陷来识别。方法对98例8 ~ 13期人胚胎的神经褶皱、神经管及神经孔进行重新评价;61只通过精确的图形重建控制。结果对人类胚胎的广泛研究表明,两个新生的神经折叠融合位点相继出现:α在菱形脑区,β在前脑区,毗邻交叉板。来自alpha站点的融合是双向的(rostrad和caudad),而来自beta站点的融合是单向的(caudad)。融合终止于神经孔,其中有两个:吻侧和尾侧。高度可变的附属融合位点,没有位置稳定性和未知的频率,可能会在第10阶段遇到,但似乎不会在以后遇到,它们的存在已经知道了半个多世纪。结论人胚胎中存在两个神经褶皱融合位点(一种更倾向于闭合的术语)和两个神经孔。没有令人信服的胚胎学证据表明,在小鼠中描述的多位点融合模式可用于人类。从来自其他物种的信息或从后来的异常检查中构建胚胎学细节容易出错。神经管缺陷的回顾,虽然他们被认为是基于五个,四个,或三个位点的融合,基于两个位点的解释可以很容易地设想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The two sites of fusion of the neural folds and the two neuropores in the human embryo.
BACKGROUND Since reports on a pattern of multiple sites of fusion of the neural folds in the mouse appeared, it has been widely assumed that a similar pattern must be valid for the human. In the absence of embryological evidence, claims have been made that such a pattern can be discerned by classifying neural tube defects. METHODS The neural folds and tube, as well as the neuropores, were reassessed in 98 human embryos of Stages 8-13; 61 were controlled by precise graphic reconstructions. RESULTS Careful study of an extensive series of staged human embryos shows that two de novo sites of fusion of the neural folds appear in succession: alpha in the rhombencephalic region and beta in the prosencephalic region, adjacent to the chiasmatic plate. Fusion from Site alpha proceeds bidirectionally (rostrad and caudad), whereas that from beta is unidirectional (caudad only). The fusions terminate in neuropores, of which there are two: rostral and caudal. Highly variable accessory loci of fusion, without positional stability and of unknown frequency, may be encountered in Stage 10 but seemingly not later, and their existence has been known for more than half a century. CONCLUSIONS Two sites of fusion (a term preferred to closure) of the neural folds and two neuropores are found in the human embryo. No convincing embryological evidence of a pattern of multiple sites of fusion, such as has been described in the mouse, is available for the human. The construction of embryological details from information derived from other species or from the examination of later anomalies is liable to error. Neural tube defects are reviewed and although they have been considered on the basis of five, four, or three sites of fusion, interpretations based on two sites can as readily be envisaged.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信