Mohammed Saif Ismail Hameed, José Núñez Ares, P. Goos
{"title":"正交最小混叠响应面设计数据分析","authors":"Mohammed Saif Ismail Hameed, José Núñez Ares, P. Goos","doi":"10.1080/00224065.2022.2151530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Experimental data are often highly structured due to the use of experimental designs. This does not only simplify the analysis, but it allows for tailored methods of analysis that extract more information from the data than generic methods. One group of three-level experimental designs that are suitable for such tailored methods are orthogonal minimally aliased response surface (OMARS) designs (Núñez Ares and Goos 2020), where all main effects are orthogonal to each other and to all second-order effects. The design based analysis method of Jones and Nachtsheim (2017) has shown significant improvement over existing methods in terms of powers to detect active effects. However, the application of their method is limited to only a small subgroup of OMARS designs known as definitive screening designs (DSDs). In our work, we not only improve upon the Jones and Nachtsheim method for DSDs, but we also generalize their analysis framework to the entire family of OMARS designs. Using extensive simulations, we show that our customized method for analyzing data from OMARS designs is highly effective in identifying active effects when compared to other modern (non-design based) analysis methods, especially in cases where the true model is complex and involves many second-order effects.","PeriodicalId":54769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Quality Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of data from orthogonal minimally aliased response surface designs\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Saif Ismail Hameed, José Núñez Ares, P. Goos\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00224065.2022.2151530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Experimental data are often highly structured due to the use of experimental designs. This does not only simplify the analysis, but it allows for tailored methods of analysis that extract more information from the data than generic methods. One group of three-level experimental designs that are suitable for such tailored methods are orthogonal minimally aliased response surface (OMARS) designs (Núñez Ares and Goos 2020), where all main effects are orthogonal to each other and to all second-order effects. The design based analysis method of Jones and Nachtsheim (2017) has shown significant improvement over existing methods in terms of powers to detect active effects. However, the application of their method is limited to only a small subgroup of OMARS designs known as definitive screening designs (DSDs). In our work, we not only improve upon the Jones and Nachtsheim method for DSDs, but we also generalize their analysis framework to the entire family of OMARS designs. Using extensive simulations, we show that our customized method for analyzing data from OMARS designs is highly effective in identifying active effects when compared to other modern (non-design based) analysis methods, especially in cases where the true model is complex and involves many second-order effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Quality Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Quality Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2022.2151530\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Quality Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2022.2151530","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of data from orthogonal minimally aliased response surface designs
Abstract Experimental data are often highly structured due to the use of experimental designs. This does not only simplify the analysis, but it allows for tailored methods of analysis that extract more information from the data than generic methods. One group of three-level experimental designs that are suitable for such tailored methods are orthogonal minimally aliased response surface (OMARS) designs (Núñez Ares and Goos 2020), where all main effects are orthogonal to each other and to all second-order effects. The design based analysis method of Jones and Nachtsheim (2017) has shown significant improvement over existing methods in terms of powers to detect active effects. However, the application of their method is limited to only a small subgroup of OMARS designs known as definitive screening designs (DSDs). In our work, we not only improve upon the Jones and Nachtsheim method for DSDs, but we also generalize their analysis framework to the entire family of OMARS designs. Using extensive simulations, we show that our customized method for analyzing data from OMARS designs is highly effective in identifying active effects when compared to other modern (non-design based) analysis methods, especially in cases where the true model is complex and involves many second-order effects.
期刊介绍:
The objective of Journal of Quality Technology is to contribute to the technical advancement of the field of quality technology by publishing papers that emphasize the practical applicability of new techniques, instructive examples of the operation of existing techniques and results of historical researches. Expository, review, and tutorial papers are also acceptable if they are written in a style suitable for practicing engineers.
Sample our Mathematics & Statistics journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days