容积加热测量心输出量方法的评价

M. Curley, P. Hamilton, J. Walsh, C.M. Rappaport, W. Newman
{"title":"容积加热测量心输出量方法的评价","authors":"M. Curley, P. Hamilton, J. Walsh, C.M. Rappaport, W. Newman","doi":"10.1109/IEMBS.1996.656882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bolus thermodilution is presently the accepted method for measuring cardiac output, but bolus thermodilution suffers from various sources of measurement error and, due to fluid loading, can only supply periodic measurements. Cardiac output measurement using resistive heating overcomes some sources of measurement error and allows continuous monitoring of cardiac output. However, because the maximum safe power input is limited with surface heating, cardiac output measurements made using resistive heating are less accurate than those made using bolus thermodilution. The authors have investigated 3 methods for measuring cardiac output using volumetric heating: RF, microwave, and laser. Given the design constraints of a catheter device, volumetric heating allows a higher maximum safe power input than surface heating. The authors have demonstrated that, under realistic thermal noise conditions, all 3 volumetric heating methods are more accurate and reliable than resistive heating. The laser heating method seems to be the most practical to implement.","PeriodicalId":20427,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of methods for measuring cardiac output with volumetric heating\",\"authors\":\"M. Curley, P. Hamilton, J. Walsh, C.M. Rappaport, W. Newman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMBS.1996.656882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bolus thermodilution is presently the accepted method for measuring cardiac output, but bolus thermodilution suffers from various sources of measurement error and, due to fluid loading, can only supply periodic measurements. Cardiac output measurement using resistive heating overcomes some sources of measurement error and allows continuous monitoring of cardiac output. However, because the maximum safe power input is limited with surface heating, cardiac output measurements made using resistive heating are less accurate than those made using bolus thermodilution. The authors have investigated 3 methods for measuring cardiac output using volumetric heating: RF, microwave, and laser. Given the design constraints of a catheter device, volumetric heating allows a higher maximum safe power input than surface heating. The authors have demonstrated that, under realistic thermal noise conditions, all 3 volumetric heating methods are more accurate and reliable than resistive heating. The laser heating method seems to be the most practical to implement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1996.656882\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.1996.656882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

大剂量热溶是目前公认的测量心输出量的方法,但大剂量热溶受到各种测量误差的影响,而且由于液体负荷的原因,只能提供周期性测量。心输出量测量使用电阻加热克服了测量误差的一些来源,并允许连续监测心输出量。然而,由于最大安全功率输入受到表面加热的限制,使用电阻加热进行的心输出量测量不如使用大剂量热稀释进行的心输出量测量准确。作者研究了使用体积加热测量心输出量的3种方法:射频、微波和激光。考虑到导管装置的设计限制,体积加热比表面加热允许更高的最大安全功率输入。作者已经证明,在实际的热噪声条件下,所有3种体积加热方法都比电阻加热更准确和可靠。激光加热法似乎是最实用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An evaluation of methods for measuring cardiac output with volumetric heating
Bolus thermodilution is presently the accepted method for measuring cardiac output, but bolus thermodilution suffers from various sources of measurement error and, due to fluid loading, can only supply periodic measurements. Cardiac output measurement using resistive heating overcomes some sources of measurement error and allows continuous monitoring of cardiac output. However, because the maximum safe power input is limited with surface heating, cardiac output measurements made using resistive heating are less accurate than those made using bolus thermodilution. The authors have investigated 3 methods for measuring cardiac output using volumetric heating: RF, microwave, and laser. Given the design constraints of a catheter device, volumetric heating allows a higher maximum safe power input than surface heating. The authors have demonstrated that, under realistic thermal noise conditions, all 3 volumetric heating methods are more accurate and reliable than resistive heating. The laser heating method seems to be the most practical to implement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信