额外护理:对痴呆夫妇可行吗?

IF 0.8 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Christopher Poyner, A. Innes, F. Dekker
{"title":"额外护理:对痴呆夫妇可行吗?","authors":"Christopher Poyner, A. Innes, F. Dekker","doi":"10.1108/HCS-12-2016-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThe perspectives of people with dementia and their care partners regarding “extra care” housing are currently unknown. The purpose of this paper is to report findings of a consultation study exploring the perceived barriers and facilitators of a relocation to extra care housing, from the perspective of people living with dementia, and their care partners. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nFieldwork consisted of paired or 1-1 interviews and small focus groups with potential users of an alternative model of extra care support for people living with dementia in the South of England. The consultation took place between June and August 2013. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analysed thematically. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nBenefits of extra care were identified as the opportunity for couples to remain living together for longer, creating a supportive, dementia-friendly community, and a reduction in the strain experienced by the care partners. Barriers centred on a sense of loss, stress and uncertainty. Living and caring at home was perceived as preferable to shared care. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nThe findings presented here have limited generalisability for two reasons. First, the shared care approach consulted on was very specific. Second, the participants form a purposive sample and as such are not representative of a wider population. Despite best intentions, the voice of people with dementia, are underreported in this consultation. Only one person with early on-set dementia was interviewed and the remaining two people with dementia were interviewed alongside their care partner. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n \nThe findings cast doubt on the viability of extra care facilities, designed for couples living with dementia, if extra care continues to be conceptualised and marketed as a preventative lifestyle choice. The findings indicate the value of consulting with people with dementia, and their care partners, when designing new forms of housing with care specifically for people living with dementia. \n \n \n \n \nSocial implications \n \n \n \n \nThe findings of this consultation exemplify the wish of couples living with dementia to remain together, in what they perceive to be “home”, for as long as possible. Couples living with dementia are therefore unlikely to wish to move into an extra care facility as a lifestyle choice option, early into their journey with dementia. This raises questions about the suitability of extra care, as a form of housing with care, for couples living with dementia. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThis paper contributes to the body of literature, exploring the feasibility of new and innovative alternative care and housing options, for people with dementia. This paper is one of the first to explore extra care as a housing and social care option for couples with dementia.","PeriodicalId":43302,"journal":{"name":"Housing Care and Support","volume":"1 1","pages":"8-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extra care : viable for couples living with dementia?\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Poyner, A. Innes, F. Dekker\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HCS-12-2016-0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe perspectives of people with dementia and their care partners regarding “extra care” housing are currently unknown. The purpose of this paper is to report findings of a consultation study exploring the perceived barriers and facilitators of a relocation to extra care housing, from the perspective of people living with dementia, and their care partners. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFieldwork consisted of paired or 1-1 interviews and small focus groups with potential users of an alternative model of extra care support for people living with dementia in the South of England. The consultation took place between June and August 2013. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analysed thematically. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nBenefits of extra care were identified as the opportunity for couples to remain living together for longer, creating a supportive, dementia-friendly community, and a reduction in the strain experienced by the care partners. Barriers centred on a sense of loss, stress and uncertainty. Living and caring at home was perceived as preferable to shared care. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nResearch limitations/implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe findings presented here have limited generalisability for two reasons. First, the shared care approach consulted on was very specific. Second, the participants form a purposive sample and as such are not representative of a wider population. Despite best intentions, the voice of people with dementia, are underreported in this consultation. Only one person with early on-set dementia was interviewed and the remaining two people with dementia were interviewed alongside their care partner. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nPractical implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe findings cast doubt on the viability of extra care facilities, designed for couples living with dementia, if extra care continues to be conceptualised and marketed as a preventative lifestyle choice. The findings indicate the value of consulting with people with dementia, and their care partners, when designing new forms of housing with care specifically for people living with dementia. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nSocial implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe findings of this consultation exemplify the wish of couples living with dementia to remain together, in what they perceive to be “home”, for as long as possible. Couples living with dementia are therefore unlikely to wish to move into an extra care facility as a lifestyle choice option, early into their journey with dementia. This raises questions about the suitability of extra care, as a form of housing with care, for couples living with dementia. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThis paper contributes to the body of literature, exploring the feasibility of new and innovative alternative care and housing options, for people with dementia. This paper is one of the first to explore extra care as a housing and social care option for couples with dementia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"8-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing Care and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-12-2016-0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing Care and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HCS-12-2016-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前尚不清楚痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴对“额外护理”住房的看法。本文的目的是报告一项咨询研究的结果,从痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴的角度探讨搬迁到额外护理住房的感知障碍和促进因素。现场工作包括配对或1-1访谈和小型焦点小组,其中包括英格兰南部痴呆症患者额外护理支持替代模式的潜在用户。咨询于2013年6月至8月进行。访谈和焦点小组都有录音,并逐字抄写。对抄本进行了专题分析。额外护理的好处被确定为夫妇有机会在一起生活更长时间,创造一个支持性的,对痴呆症友好的社区,并减少护理伙伴所经历的压力。障碍集中在失落感、压力和不确定性上。人们认为在家里生活和照顾比分担照顾更可取。由于两个原因,本文提出的研究结果具有有限的普遍性。首先,咨询的共同护理方法非常具体。其次,参与者形成了一个有目的的样本,因此不能代表更广泛的人口。尽管出发点是好的,但在这次咨询中,痴呆症患者的声音被低估了。只有一名早期痴呆患者接受了采访,其余两名痴呆患者与他们的护理伙伴一起接受了采访。如果额外护理继续作为一种预防生活方式的选择被概念化和营销,研究结果对为痴呆症夫妇设计的额外护理设施的可行性提出了质疑。研究结果表明,在设计专门针对痴呆症患者的新型住房时,咨询痴呆症患者及其护理伙伴的价值。这次咨询的结果表明,患有痴呆症的夫妇希望尽可能长时间地呆在一起,在他们认为是“家”的地方。因此,患有痴呆症的夫妇不太可能希望在患痴呆症的早期就把搬进额外的护理机构作为一种生活方式的选择。这就提出了额外照顾是否适合的问题,作为一种照顾住房的形式,对于患有痴呆症的夫妇来说。原创性/价值这篇论文为文献的主体做出了贡献,为痴呆症患者探索了新的和创新的替代护理和住房选择的可行性。这篇论文是第一个探索额外护理作为痴呆症夫妇的住房和社会护理选择的论文之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extra care : viable for couples living with dementia?
Purpose The perspectives of people with dementia and their care partners regarding “extra care” housing are currently unknown. The purpose of this paper is to report findings of a consultation study exploring the perceived barriers and facilitators of a relocation to extra care housing, from the perspective of people living with dementia, and their care partners. Design/methodology/approach Fieldwork consisted of paired or 1-1 interviews and small focus groups with potential users of an alternative model of extra care support for people living with dementia in the South of England. The consultation took place between June and August 2013. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analysed thematically. Findings Benefits of extra care were identified as the opportunity for couples to remain living together for longer, creating a supportive, dementia-friendly community, and a reduction in the strain experienced by the care partners. Barriers centred on a sense of loss, stress and uncertainty. Living and caring at home was perceived as preferable to shared care. Research limitations/implications The findings presented here have limited generalisability for two reasons. First, the shared care approach consulted on was very specific. Second, the participants form a purposive sample and as such are not representative of a wider population. Despite best intentions, the voice of people with dementia, are underreported in this consultation. Only one person with early on-set dementia was interviewed and the remaining two people with dementia were interviewed alongside their care partner. Practical implications The findings cast doubt on the viability of extra care facilities, designed for couples living with dementia, if extra care continues to be conceptualised and marketed as a preventative lifestyle choice. The findings indicate the value of consulting with people with dementia, and their care partners, when designing new forms of housing with care specifically for people living with dementia. Social implications The findings of this consultation exemplify the wish of couples living with dementia to remain together, in what they perceive to be “home”, for as long as possible. Couples living with dementia are therefore unlikely to wish to move into an extra care facility as a lifestyle choice option, early into their journey with dementia. This raises questions about the suitability of extra care, as a form of housing with care, for couples living with dementia. Originality/value This paper contributes to the body of literature, exploring the feasibility of new and innovative alternative care and housing options, for people with dementia. This paper is one of the first to explore extra care as a housing and social care option for couples with dementia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Housing Care and Support
Housing Care and Support URBAN STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信