基于CMEMS再分析的巴西海上能源资源评估风浪评估

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
I. Freitas, H. Gomes, M. Peña, Panagiotis Mitsopoulos, Thayna Silva Vila Nova, Kécia Maria Roberto da Silva, A. Calheiros
{"title":"基于CMEMS再分析的巴西海上能源资源评估风浪评估","authors":"I. Freitas, H. Gomes, M. Peña, Panagiotis Mitsopoulos, Thayna Silva Vila Nova, Kécia Maria Roberto da Silva, A. Calheiros","doi":"10.3390/wind2030031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to evaluate wind speed and significant wave height data from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) reanalysis using buoy measurements for offshore energy application off the east coast of Brazil. Such analysis has become important, since reanalysis datasets can be fundamental tools in identifying regions with wind energy potential that are suitable for the installation of offshore farms. Two sets of reanalysis were used: wind speed (with spatial resolution of 0.25° and temporal resolution of 6 h) and significant wave height (with spatial resolution of 0.2° and temporal resolution of 3 h). For validation, seven MetOcean buoys were selected. In the statistical validation, Pearson’s correlation, coefficient of determination (R2), slope of the straight line, root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), probability density function (PDF), mean and standard deviation were calculated. In the evaluation of offshore wind energy resources, the calculation of energy density was performed. The results showed correlations above 0.70 for wind speed and above 0.91 for significant wave height, and additionally, the RMSE values showed maximums of 2.31 m/s for wind speed and 0.28 cm for significant wave height. In the PDF comparison of buoy data and reanalysis, similarities were observed, mainly in the PDF parameters. The energy density presented values consistent with other studies (352–461 W/m²). The results show that the reanalysis data can be applicable in studies focusing on offshore wind potential.","PeriodicalId":51210,"journal":{"name":"Wind and Structures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Wind and Wave Estimates from CMEMS Reanalysis for Brazil’s Offshore Energy Resource Assessment\",\"authors\":\"I. Freitas, H. Gomes, M. Peña, Panagiotis Mitsopoulos, Thayna Silva Vila Nova, Kécia Maria Roberto da Silva, A. Calheiros\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/wind2030031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to evaluate wind speed and significant wave height data from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) reanalysis using buoy measurements for offshore energy application off the east coast of Brazil. Such analysis has become important, since reanalysis datasets can be fundamental tools in identifying regions with wind energy potential that are suitable for the installation of offshore farms. Two sets of reanalysis were used: wind speed (with spatial resolution of 0.25° and temporal resolution of 6 h) and significant wave height (with spatial resolution of 0.2° and temporal resolution of 3 h). For validation, seven MetOcean buoys were selected. In the statistical validation, Pearson’s correlation, coefficient of determination (R2), slope of the straight line, root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), probability density function (PDF), mean and standard deviation were calculated. In the evaluation of offshore wind energy resources, the calculation of energy density was performed. The results showed correlations above 0.70 for wind speed and above 0.91 for significant wave height, and additionally, the RMSE values showed maximums of 2.31 m/s for wind speed and 0.28 cm for significant wave height. In the PDF comparison of buoy data and reanalysis, similarities were observed, mainly in the PDF parameters. The energy density presented values consistent with other studies (352–461 W/m²). The results show that the reanalysis data can be applicable in studies focusing on offshore wind potential.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wind and Structures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wind and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/wind2030031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wind and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/wind2030031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在评估哥白尼海洋环境监测服务(CMEMS)利用浮标测量再分析的风速和重要波高数据,用于巴西东海岸的海上能源应用。这种分析变得非常重要,因为重新分析数据集可以成为确定适合安装海上发电场的风能潜力地区的基本工具。采用风速(空间分辨率为0.25°,时间分辨率为6 h)和显著波高(空间分辨率为0.2°,时间分辨率为3 h)两组再分析数据,选取7个metoocean浮标进行验证。在统计验证中,计算Pearson相关、决定系数(R2)、直线斜率、均方根误差(RMSE)、均方误差(MSE)、概率密度函数(PDF)、均值和标准差。在海上风能资源评价中,进行了能量密度的计算。结果表明,风速和显著波高的相关系数均在0.70以上,显著波高的相关系数均在0.91以上,风速和显著波高的RMSE最大值分别为2.31 m/s和0.28 cm。在浮标数据的PDF对比和再分析中,发现了相似之处,主要体现在PDF参数上。能量密度与其他研究结果一致(352-461 W/m²)。结果表明,再分析数据可用于海上风电潜力研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Wind and Wave Estimates from CMEMS Reanalysis for Brazil’s Offshore Energy Resource Assessment
This study aims to evaluate wind speed and significant wave height data from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS) reanalysis using buoy measurements for offshore energy application off the east coast of Brazil. Such analysis has become important, since reanalysis datasets can be fundamental tools in identifying regions with wind energy potential that are suitable for the installation of offshore farms. Two sets of reanalysis were used: wind speed (with spatial resolution of 0.25° and temporal resolution of 6 h) and significant wave height (with spatial resolution of 0.2° and temporal resolution of 3 h). For validation, seven MetOcean buoys were selected. In the statistical validation, Pearson’s correlation, coefficient of determination (R2), slope of the straight line, root mean square error (RMSE), mean square error (MSE), probability density function (PDF), mean and standard deviation were calculated. In the evaluation of offshore wind energy resources, the calculation of energy density was performed. The results showed correlations above 0.70 for wind speed and above 0.91 for significant wave height, and additionally, the RMSE values showed maximums of 2.31 m/s for wind speed and 0.28 cm for significant wave height. In the PDF comparison of buoy data and reanalysis, similarities were observed, mainly in the PDF parameters. The energy density presented values consistent with other studies (352–461 W/m²). The results show that the reanalysis data can be applicable in studies focusing on offshore wind potential.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wind and Structures
Wind and Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The WIND AND STRUCTURES, An International Journal, aims at: - Major publication channel for research in the general area of wind and structural engineering, - Wider distribution at more affordable subscription rates; - Faster reviewing and publication for manuscripts submitted. The main theme of the Journal is the wind effects on structures. Areas covered by the journal include: Wind loads and structural response, Bluff-body aerodynamics, Computational method, Wind tunnel modeling, Local wind environment, Codes and regulations, Wind effects on large scale structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信