SMED方法在两种不同切削线上应用的比较

IF 1.8 Q3 MANAGEMENT
A. Silva, J. C. Sá, G. Santos, Francisco J. G. Silva, L. P. Ferreira, M. T. Pereira
{"title":"SMED方法在两种不同切削线上应用的比较","authors":"A. Silva, J. C. Sá, G. Santos, Francisco J. G. Silva, L. P. Ferreira, M. T. Pereira","doi":"10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study was carried out in a cork company. Its purpose was to observe and analyse the practices and methods used during the tools/series change moments and to propose improvements to these same procedures so that the time needed to carry out the setup is reduced by 15% in both lines. Methodology/Approach: The methodology included the following phases: 1st – historical data collection, 2nd – footage analysis and conduction of informal interviews with employees, 3rd – flow, Gantt, and spaghetti charts creation and making of an action plan based on the waste and improvement opportunities, 4th – validation with the line workers of the new operating mode created with the SMED tool, 5th – placement of plasticized cards on the cutting lines to ensure that new operating mode is followed in the action plan. Findings: Throughout this project using observations, video recording and its subsequent analysis, as well as, interviews to the workers operating in the line, it was found the existence of several actions carried out by them during the setups which did not add value to the product and lack of work tools in general. Research Limitation/Implication: The study was limited by the lines and products under study and by the duration of the curricular internship, which was about five months. Originality/Value of paper: The article demonstrates the added value in terms of product quality and production output rate that SMED methodology can bring to companies that adopt the lean philosophy and in particular this continuous improvement tool. Category: Research paper","PeriodicalId":44057,"journal":{"name":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","volume":"30 1","pages":"124-149"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of the Application of the SMED Methodology in Two Different Cutting Lines\",\"authors\":\"A. Silva, J. C. Sá, G. Santos, Francisco J. G. Silva, L. P. Ferreira, M. T. Pereira\",\"doi\":\"10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study was carried out in a cork company. Its purpose was to observe and analyse the practices and methods used during the tools/series change moments and to propose improvements to these same procedures so that the time needed to carry out the setup is reduced by 15% in both lines. Methodology/Approach: The methodology included the following phases: 1st – historical data collection, 2nd – footage analysis and conduction of informal interviews with employees, 3rd – flow, Gantt, and spaghetti charts creation and making of an action plan based on the waste and improvement opportunities, 4th – validation with the line workers of the new operating mode created with the SMED tool, 5th – placement of plasticized cards on the cutting lines to ensure that new operating mode is followed in the action plan. Findings: Throughout this project using observations, video recording and its subsequent analysis, as well as, interviews to the workers operating in the line, it was found the existence of several actions carried out by them during the setups which did not add value to the product and lack of work tools in general. Research Limitation/Implication: The study was limited by the lines and products under study and by the duration of the curricular internship, which was about five months. Originality/Value of paper: The article demonstrates the added value in terms of product quality and production output rate that SMED methodology can bring to companies that adopt the lean philosophy and in particular this continuous improvement tool. Category: Research paper\",\"PeriodicalId\":44057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"124-149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Innovation Prosperity-Kvalita Inovacia Prosperita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12776/QIP.V25I1.1446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究在一家软木公司进行。其目的是观察和分析在工具/系列变化时刻使用的实践和方法,并对这些相同的程序提出改进建议,以便在两条线中执行设置所需的时间减少15%。方法/方法:方法包括以下阶段:第一-收集历史数据,第二-对员工进行录像分析和非正式访谈,第三-根据浪费和改进机会创建流程图,甘特图和意大利面图,并制定行动计划,第四-与生产线工人验证使用SMED工具创建的新操作模式,第五-在切割线上放置塑化卡,以确保在行动计划中遵循新的操作模式。研究结果:在整个项目中,通过观察、录像和随后的分析,以及对在生产线上工作的工人的采访,发现他们在设置过程中进行的几个行动没有增加产品的价值,而且通常缺乏工作工具。研究局限/启示:本研究受限于所研究的系列和产品,以及课程实习的时间,大约五个月。论文的原创性/价值:本文展示了SMED方法在产品质量和生产产出率方面的附加价值,可以为采用精益理念的公司带来,特别是这种持续改进工具。类别:研究论文
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of the Application of the SMED Methodology in Two Different Cutting Lines
Purpose: This study was carried out in a cork company. Its purpose was to observe and analyse the practices and methods used during the tools/series change moments and to propose improvements to these same procedures so that the time needed to carry out the setup is reduced by 15% in both lines. Methodology/Approach: The methodology included the following phases: 1st – historical data collection, 2nd – footage analysis and conduction of informal interviews with employees, 3rd – flow, Gantt, and spaghetti charts creation and making of an action plan based on the waste and improvement opportunities, 4th – validation with the line workers of the new operating mode created with the SMED tool, 5th – placement of plasticized cards on the cutting lines to ensure that new operating mode is followed in the action plan. Findings: Throughout this project using observations, video recording and its subsequent analysis, as well as, interviews to the workers operating in the line, it was found the existence of several actions carried out by them during the setups which did not add value to the product and lack of work tools in general. Research Limitation/Implication: The study was limited by the lines and products under study and by the duration of the curricular internship, which was about five months. Originality/Value of paper: The article demonstrates the added value in terms of product quality and production output rate that SMED methodology can bring to companies that adopt the lean philosophy and in particular this continuous improvement tool. Category: Research paper
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信