比较单独或联合氟西汀对非季节性抑郁症患者抑郁严重程度、昼夜节律、情绪障碍和睡眠质量的影响

M. Ağargün, G. Sayar, Hüseyin Bulut, O. Tan
{"title":"比较单独或联合氟西汀对非季节性抑郁症患者抑郁严重程度、昼夜节律、情绪障碍和睡眠质量的影响","authors":"M. Ağargün, G. Sayar, Hüseyin Bulut, O. Tan","doi":"10.2147/CPT.S46140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Correspondence: Gokben Hizli Sayar Department of Psychiatry, Uskudar University, Neuropsychiatry Istanbul Hospital, Alemdag Caddesi Site Yolu No 29 Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkey Tel +90 216 633 0649 Fax +90 216 634 1250 Email gokben.hizlisayar@uskudar.edu.tr Purpose: To compare effects of bright light therapy (BLT) alone or combined with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine, on severity of depression, circadian rhythms, mood disturbance, and sleep quality, in patients with non-seasonal depression. Patients and methods: Drug-free patients who were administered 10,000 lux of BLT for 30 minutes for 7 days comprised the BLT group (n = 7), while patients who started fluoxetine as an add-on treatment day comprised the SSRI + BLT group (n = 8). The primary outcomes were severity of depression, measured using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); chronotype, measured using the Morningness Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ); mood disturbance, measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) survey; and sleep quality, measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), before and after treatment in both groups. Results: All patients completed the study, and none reported obvious side effects. The mean onset age of depression was 26.1 years ± 5.3 years in the BLT group and 27 years ± 9.5 years in the SSRI + BLT group (P = 0.425). The number of past depressive episodes was 1.29 ± 0.76 in the BLT group, and 1.5 ± 0.8 in the SSRI + BLT group (P = 0.427). The difference between preand posttreatment scores revealed no significant difference between groups for the HAM-D scale, BDI, MEQ, POMS survey, and the PSQI. Conclusion: This study suggests that BLT is effective with respect to the severity of depression, circadian rhythms, mood disturbance, and sleep quality, in non-seasonal depression. However, there was no evidence in favor of adjunctive fluoxetine with BLT in the treatment of non-seasonal depression, for any of the rating scales used in our study.","PeriodicalId":10315,"journal":{"name":"ChronoPhysiology and Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of effects of bright light therapy alone or combined with fluoxetine on severity of depression, circadian rhythms, mood disturbance, and sleep quality, in patients with non-seasonal depression\",\"authors\":\"M. Ağargün, G. Sayar, Hüseyin Bulut, O. Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CPT.S46140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Correspondence: Gokben Hizli Sayar Department of Psychiatry, Uskudar University, Neuropsychiatry Istanbul Hospital, Alemdag Caddesi Site Yolu No 29 Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkey Tel +90 216 633 0649 Fax +90 216 634 1250 Email gokben.hizlisayar@uskudar.edu.tr Purpose: To compare effects of bright light therapy (BLT) alone or combined with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine, on severity of depression, circadian rhythms, mood disturbance, and sleep quality, in patients with non-seasonal depression. Patients and methods: Drug-free patients who were administered 10,000 lux of BLT for 30 minutes for 7 days comprised the BLT group (n = 7), while patients who started fluoxetine as an add-on treatment day comprised the SSRI + BLT group (n = 8). The primary outcomes were severity of depression, measured using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); chronotype, measured using the Morningness Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ); mood disturbance, measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) survey; and sleep quality, measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), before and after treatment in both groups. Results: All patients completed the study, and none reported obvious side effects. The mean onset age of depression was 26.1 years ± 5.3 years in the BLT group and 27 years ± 9.5 years in the SSRI + BLT group (P = 0.425). The number of past depressive episodes was 1.29 ± 0.76 in the BLT group, and 1.5 ± 0.8 in the SSRI + BLT group (P = 0.427). The difference between preand posttreatment scores revealed no significant difference between groups for the HAM-D scale, BDI, MEQ, POMS survey, and the PSQI. Conclusion: This study suggests that BLT is effective with respect to the severity of depression, circadian rhythms, mood disturbance, and sleep quality, in non-seasonal depression. However, there was no evidence in favor of adjunctive fluoxetine with BLT in the treatment of non-seasonal depression, for any of the rating scales used in our study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ChronoPhysiology and Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ChronoPhysiology and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPT.S46140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChronoPhysiology and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CPT.S46140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

通讯:Gokben Hizli Sayar精神科,乌斯库达尔大学,伊斯坦布尔神经精神病院,Alemdag Caddesi Site Yolu No 29 Umraniye,伊斯坦布尔,土耳其电话+90 216 633 0649传真+90 216 634 1250电子邮件gokben.hizlisayar@uskudar.edu.tr目的:比较光疗法(BLT)单独或联合选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)氟西汀对非季节性抑郁症患者抑郁严重程度、昼夜节律、情绪障碍和睡眠质量的影响。患者和方法:7天内给予10,000 lux BLT 30分钟的无药物患者组成BLT组(n = 7),而开始氟西汀作为附加治疗日的患者组成SSRI + BLT组(n = 8)。主要结局是抑郁严重程度,使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(hamd)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)测量;时间类型,使用晨醒性问卷(MEQ)测量;心境障碍,用心境状态量表(POMS)测量;以及使用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)测量两组患者治疗前后的睡眠质量。结果:所有患者均完成研究,无明显副作用。BLT组的平均发病年龄为26.1±5.3岁,SSRI + BLT组的平均发病年龄为27±9.5岁(P = 0.425)。BLT组抑郁发作次数为1.29±0.76次,SSRI + BLT组为1.5±0.8次(P = 0.427)。治疗前和治疗后评分的差异显示各组之间HAM-D量表、BDI、MEQ、POMS调查和PSQI无显著差异。结论:本研究表明,在非季节性抑郁症患者中,BLT在抑郁严重程度、昼夜节律、情绪障碍和睡眠质量方面是有效的。然而,在我们的研究中使用的任何评分量表中,没有证据支持氟西汀与BLT辅助治疗非季节性抑郁症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of effects of bright light therapy alone or combined with fluoxetine on severity of depression, circadian rhythms, mood disturbance, and sleep quality, in patients with non-seasonal depression
Correspondence: Gokben Hizli Sayar Department of Psychiatry, Uskudar University, Neuropsychiatry Istanbul Hospital, Alemdag Caddesi Site Yolu No 29 Umraniye, Istanbul, Turkey Tel +90 216 633 0649 Fax +90 216 634 1250 Email gokben.hizlisayar@uskudar.edu.tr Purpose: To compare effects of bright light therapy (BLT) alone or combined with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) fluoxetine, on severity of depression, circadian rhythms, mood disturbance, and sleep quality, in patients with non-seasonal depression. Patients and methods: Drug-free patients who were administered 10,000 lux of BLT for 30 minutes for 7 days comprised the BLT group (n = 7), while patients who started fluoxetine as an add-on treatment day comprised the SSRI + BLT group (n = 8). The primary outcomes were severity of depression, measured using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); chronotype, measured using the Morningness Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ); mood disturbance, measured using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) survey; and sleep quality, measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), before and after treatment in both groups. Results: All patients completed the study, and none reported obvious side effects. The mean onset age of depression was 26.1 years ± 5.3 years in the BLT group and 27 years ± 9.5 years in the SSRI + BLT group (P = 0.425). The number of past depressive episodes was 1.29 ± 0.76 in the BLT group, and 1.5 ± 0.8 in the SSRI + BLT group (P = 0.427). The difference between preand posttreatment scores revealed no significant difference between groups for the HAM-D scale, BDI, MEQ, POMS survey, and the PSQI. Conclusion: This study suggests that BLT is effective with respect to the severity of depression, circadian rhythms, mood disturbance, and sleep quality, in non-seasonal depression. However, there was no evidence in favor of adjunctive fluoxetine with BLT in the treatment of non-seasonal depression, for any of the rating scales used in our study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信