Colloquium, A. Mickiewicz, Szymon Chlebowski, Andrzej Gajda, Marta Gawek, Patrycja Kupś, Paweł Łupkowski, Dawid Ratajczyk, Agata Tomczyk, A. Wasielewska, Joanna Golinska-Pilarek, L. Kolodziejczyk, M. Nasieniewski, J. Pogonowski, Tomasz F. Skura, K. Swirydowicz, M. Soskova, B. Monin, L. Ros
{"title":"符号逻辑协会2021年欧洲夏季会议逻辑研讨会' 21亚当·密茨维茨大学,波兰波兹纳斯,2021年7月19-24日","authors":"Colloquium, A. Mickiewicz, Szymon Chlebowski, Andrzej Gajda, Marta Gawek, Patrycja Kupś, Paweł Łupkowski, Dawid Ratajczyk, Agata Tomczyk, A. Wasielewska, Joanna Golinska-Pilarek, L. Kolodziejczyk, M. Nasieniewski, J. Pogonowski, Tomasz F. Skura, K. Swirydowicz, M. Soskova, B. Monin, L. Ros","doi":"10.1017/bsl.2022.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"of the invited 31st Annual Gödel Lecture ELISABETH BOUSCAREN, The ubiquity of configurations in model theory. CNRS—Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. E-mail: elisabeth.bouscaren@universite-paris-saclay.fr. Originally in Classification Theory, then in Geometric Stability, and now, beyond Stability, in Tame Model Theory, one common essential feature is the identification and study of some geometric configurations, of combinatorial and dimensional theoretic nature. They can witness the combinatorial and the model theoretic complexity of a theory or indicate the existence of specific definable algebraic structures. This enables model theory to tackle questions from very diverse subjects. We will attempt to illustrate the importance of these configurations through some examples. Abstract of invited tutorialsof invited tutorials KRZYSZTOF KRUPIŃSKI, Topological dynamics in model theory. University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland. E-mail: kkrup@math.uni.wroc.pl. Some fundamental notions and methods of topological dynamics were introduced to model theory by Newelski in the mid-2000s. In the first part of my tutorial, I will recall some basic notions of topological dynamics, discuss the flows which appear naturally in model theory (as various spaces of types), and give applications of basic topological dynamics to some group covering results of Newelski such as: if an א0-saturated group is covered by countably many 0-type-definable sets Xn , n ∈ , then for some finite A ⊆ G and n ∈ , G = AXnX –1 n . In the second part, I will define the Ellis semigroup and Ellis group of a flow, and focus on connections between the Ellis groups of natural flows in model theory and certain invariants of definable groups (quotients by model-theoretic connected components) or first order theories (Galois groups of first order theories as well as spaces of strong types). In particular, I will discuss the results of Pillay, Rzepecki, and myself which present certain invariants of this kind as quotients of compact (Hausdorff) groups (which are canonical Hausdorff quotients of Ellis groups). This has various consequences obtained by Pillay, Rzepecki, and myself, e.g., it leads to a general result that model-theoretic type-definability of a bounded invariant equivalence relation defined on a single complete type over ∅ is equivalent to descriptive set theoretic smoothness of this relation. 270 LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 In the last part, I will discuss a definable variant of Kechris–Pestov–Todorčević (KPT) theory, developed by Lee, Moconja, and myself. KPT theory studies relationships between dynamical properties of the groups of automorphisms of Fraïssé structures and Ramseytheoretic (so combinatorial) properties of the underlying Fraïssé classes. In our research, the idea is to find interactions between dynamical properties of first order theories (i.e., properties related to the actions of the automorphism group of a sufficiently saturated model on various types spaces over this model) and definable versions of Ramsey-theoretic properties of the theory. This leads to analogs of various results of KPT theory (i.e., a combinatorial characterization of the definable extreme amenability of a theory), but also to some rather novel theorems, e.g., yielding criteria for profiniteness of the Ellis group of a first order theory. The author is supported by National Science Center, Poland, grants 2015/19/B/ST1/ 01151, 2016/22/E/ST1/00450, and 2018/31/B/ST1/00357. ANDREW MARKS, Characterizing Borel complexity and an application to decomposability. University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. E-mail: marks@math.ucla.edu. We give a new characterization of when sets in the Borel hierarchy are Σn hard. This characterization is proved using Antonio Montalban’s true stages method for conducting priority arguments in computability theory. We use this to prove the decomposability conjecture, assuming projective determinacy. The decomposability conjecture describes what Borel functions are decomposable into a countable union of partial continuous functions with Πn domains. This is joint work with Adam Day. Abstracts of invited keynote lecturess of invited keynote lectures ARTEM CHERNIKOV, Measures in model theory. Department of Mathematics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 900951555, USA. E-mail: chernikov@math.ucla.edu. URL Address: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~chernikov/. In model theory, a type is an ultrafilter on the Boolean algebra of definable sets in a structure, which is the same thing as a finitely additive {0, 1}-valued measure. This is a special kind of a Keisler measure, which is just a finitely additive real-valued probability measure on the Boolean algebra of definable sets. Introduced by Keisler in the late 80s, Keisler measures became a central object of study in the last decade. This is motivated by several intertwined lines of research. One of them (and perhaps the oldest one) is the development of probabilistic and continuous logics. Another is the study of definable groups in o-minimal, and more generally in NIP theories, leading to interesting connections with topological dynamics. Further motivation comes from applications in additive and in extremal combinatorics, uniting the aforementioned directions. I will survey some of the recent developments in the subject. [1] A. Chernikov, Model theory, Keisler measures and groups, this Journal, vol. 24 (2018), no. 3, pp. 336–339. [2] A. Chernikov and K. Gannon, Definable convolution and idempotent Keisler measures. Israel Journal of Mathematics, to appear, 2021, arXiv:2004.10378. [3] A. Chernikov, E. Hrushovski, A. Kruckman, K. Krupinski, S. Moconja, A. Pillay, and N. Ramsey, Invariant measures in simple and in small theories, preprint, 2021, arXiv:2105.07281. [4] A. Chernikov and P. Simon, Definably amenable NIP groups. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 31 (2018), no. 3, pp. 609–641. [5] A. Chernikov and S. Starchenko, Regularity lemma for distal structures. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, vol. 20 (2018), no. 10, pp. 2437–2466. [6] A. Chernikov and H. Towsner, Hypergraph regularity and higher arity VC-dimension, preprint, 2020, arXiv:2010.00726. LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 271 VERA FISCHER, Combinatorial sets of reals. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. E-mail: vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. Infinitary combinatorial sets of reals, such as almost disjoint families, cofinitary groups, independent families, and towers, occupy a central place in the study of the set-theoretic properties of the real line. Of particular interest are such extremal sets of reals, i.e., combinatorial sets which are maximal under inclusion with respect to a desired property, their possible cardinalities, definability properties, as well as the existence or non-existence of ZFC dependences. The study of such combinatorial sets of reals is closely connected with the development of a broad spectrum of forcing techniques. In this talk we will see some recent advances in the subject and point towards interesting remaining open questions. NOAM GREENBERG, The information common to relatively random sequences. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. E-mail: noam.greenberg@vuw.ac.nz. If X and Y are relatively random, what common information can X and Y have? We use algorithmic randomness and computability theory to make sense of this question. The answer involves some unexpected ingredients, such as the Lebesgue density theorem, and linear programming, and reveals a rich hierarchy of Turing degrees within the K -trivial degrees. BENOÎT MONIN, The computational content of Miliken’s tree theorem. Créteil University, Créteil, France. E-mail: benoit.monin@computability.fr. The Milliken’s tree theorem is an extension of Ramsey’s theorem to trees. It implies for instance that if we assign to all the sets of two strings of the same length, one among k colors, there is an infinite binary tree within which every pair of strings of the same height has the same color. We are going to present some results on Milliken’s tree theorem from the viewpoint of computability theory and reverse mathematics. LUCA MOTTO ROS, Generalized descriptive set theory for all cofinalities, and some applications. University of Turin, Turin, Italy. E-mail: luca.mottoros@unito.it. Generalized descriptive set theory is nowadays a very active field of research. The idea is to develop a higher analogue of classical descriptive set theory in which is systematically replaced with an uncountable cardinal κ. With a few exceptions, papers in this area tend to concentrate on the case of regular cardinals. This is because under such an assumption one can easily generalize a number of basic facts and techniques from the classical setup, but from the theoretical viewpoint the choice is indeed not fully justified. In this talk I will survey some recent work in which the theory is instead developed in a uniform and cofinality-independent way, thus naturally including the case of singular cardinals. I will also consider some interesting applications connecting generalized descriptive set theory to Shelah’s stability theory (in the case of regular cardinals), and to the study of nonseparable complete metric spaces under Woodin’s axiom IO (in the case of singular cardinals of countable cofinality). FRANK PFENNING, Adjoint logic. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. E-mail: fp@cs.cmu.edu. We introduce adjoint logic as a general framework for integrating logics with different structural properties, that is, admitting or denying exchange, weakening, or contraction among the hypotheses. We investigate its proof-theoretic properties from two angles: proof construction and proof reduction. The former is the basis for applications in logical 272 LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 frameworks and logic programming, while the latter provides computational interpretations in functional and concurrent programming.","PeriodicalId":22265,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"2021 EUROPEAN SUMMER MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR SYMBOLIC LOGIC LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań, Poland July 19–24, 2021\",\"authors\":\"Colloquium, A. Mickiewicz, Szymon Chlebowski, Andrzej Gajda, Marta Gawek, Patrycja Kupś, Paweł Łupkowski, Dawid Ratajczyk, Agata Tomczyk, A. Wasielewska, Joanna Golinska-Pilarek, L. Kolodziejczyk, M. Nasieniewski, J. Pogonowski, Tomasz F. Skura, K. Swirydowicz, M. Soskova, B. Monin, L. Ros\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/bsl.2022.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"of the invited 31st Annual Gödel Lecture ELISABETH BOUSCAREN, The ubiquity of configurations in model theory. CNRS—Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. E-mail: elisabeth.bouscaren@universite-paris-saclay.fr. Originally in Classification Theory, then in Geometric Stability, and now, beyond Stability, in Tame Model Theory, one common essential feature is the identification and study of some geometric configurations, of combinatorial and dimensional theoretic nature. They can witness the combinatorial and the model theoretic complexity of a theory or indicate the existence of specific definable algebraic structures. This enables model theory to tackle questions from very diverse subjects. We will attempt to illustrate the importance of these configurations through some examples. Abstract of invited tutorialsof invited tutorials KRZYSZTOF KRUPIŃSKI, Topological dynamics in model theory. University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland. E-mail: kkrup@math.uni.wroc.pl. Some fundamental notions and methods of topological dynamics were introduced to model theory by Newelski in the mid-2000s. In the first part of my tutorial, I will recall some basic notions of topological dynamics, discuss the flows which appear naturally in model theory (as various spaces of types), and give applications of basic topological dynamics to some group covering results of Newelski such as: if an א0-saturated group is covered by countably many 0-type-definable sets Xn , n ∈ , then for some finite A ⊆ G and n ∈ , G = AXnX –1 n . In the second part, I will define the Ellis semigroup and Ellis group of a flow, and focus on connections between the Ellis groups of natural flows in model theory and certain invariants of definable groups (quotients by model-theoretic connected components) or first order theories (Galois groups of first order theories as well as spaces of strong types). In particular, I will discuss the results of Pillay, Rzepecki, and myself which present certain invariants of this kind as quotients of compact (Hausdorff) groups (which are canonical Hausdorff quotients of Ellis groups). This has various consequences obtained by Pillay, Rzepecki, and myself, e.g., it leads to a general result that model-theoretic type-definability of a bounded invariant equivalence relation defined on a single complete type over ∅ is equivalent to descriptive set theoretic smoothness of this relation. 270 LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 In the last part, I will discuss a definable variant of Kechris–Pestov–Todorčević (KPT) theory, developed by Lee, Moconja, and myself. KPT theory studies relationships between dynamical properties of the groups of automorphisms of Fraïssé structures and Ramseytheoretic (so combinatorial) properties of the underlying Fraïssé classes. In our research, the idea is to find interactions between dynamical properties of first order theories (i.e., properties related to the actions of the automorphism group of a sufficiently saturated model on various types spaces over this model) and definable versions of Ramsey-theoretic properties of the theory. This leads to analogs of various results of KPT theory (i.e., a combinatorial characterization of the definable extreme amenability of a theory), but also to some rather novel theorems, e.g., yielding criteria for profiniteness of the Ellis group of a first order theory. The author is supported by National Science Center, Poland, grants 2015/19/B/ST1/ 01151, 2016/22/E/ST1/00450, and 2018/31/B/ST1/00357. ANDREW MARKS, Characterizing Borel complexity and an application to decomposability. University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. E-mail: marks@math.ucla.edu. We give a new characterization of when sets in the Borel hierarchy are Σn hard. This characterization is proved using Antonio Montalban’s true stages method for conducting priority arguments in computability theory. We use this to prove the decomposability conjecture, assuming projective determinacy. The decomposability conjecture describes what Borel functions are decomposable into a countable union of partial continuous functions with Πn domains. This is joint work with Adam Day. Abstracts of invited keynote lecturess of invited keynote lectures ARTEM CHERNIKOV, Measures in model theory. Department of Mathematics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 900951555, USA. E-mail: chernikov@math.ucla.edu. URL Address: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~chernikov/. In model theory, a type is an ultrafilter on the Boolean algebra of definable sets in a structure, which is the same thing as a finitely additive {0, 1}-valued measure. This is a special kind of a Keisler measure, which is just a finitely additive real-valued probability measure on the Boolean algebra of definable sets. Introduced by Keisler in the late 80s, Keisler measures became a central object of study in the last decade. This is motivated by several intertwined lines of research. One of them (and perhaps the oldest one) is the development of probabilistic and continuous logics. Another is the study of definable groups in o-minimal, and more generally in NIP theories, leading to interesting connections with topological dynamics. Further motivation comes from applications in additive and in extremal combinatorics, uniting the aforementioned directions. I will survey some of the recent developments in the subject. [1] A. Chernikov, Model theory, Keisler measures and groups, this Journal, vol. 24 (2018), no. 3, pp. 336–339. [2] A. Chernikov and K. Gannon, Definable convolution and idempotent Keisler measures. Israel Journal of Mathematics, to appear, 2021, arXiv:2004.10378. [3] A. Chernikov, E. Hrushovski, A. Kruckman, K. Krupinski, S. Moconja, A. Pillay, and N. Ramsey, Invariant measures in simple and in small theories, preprint, 2021, arXiv:2105.07281. [4] A. Chernikov and P. Simon, Definably amenable NIP groups. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 31 (2018), no. 3, pp. 609–641. [5] A. Chernikov and S. Starchenko, Regularity lemma for distal structures. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, vol. 20 (2018), no. 10, pp. 2437–2466. [6] A. Chernikov and H. Towsner, Hypergraph regularity and higher arity VC-dimension, preprint, 2020, arXiv:2010.00726. LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 271 VERA FISCHER, Combinatorial sets of reals. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. E-mail: vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. Infinitary combinatorial sets of reals, such as almost disjoint families, cofinitary groups, independent families, and towers, occupy a central place in the study of the set-theoretic properties of the real line. Of particular interest are such extremal sets of reals, i.e., combinatorial sets which are maximal under inclusion with respect to a desired property, their possible cardinalities, definability properties, as well as the existence or non-existence of ZFC dependences. The study of such combinatorial sets of reals is closely connected with the development of a broad spectrum of forcing techniques. In this talk we will see some recent advances in the subject and point towards interesting remaining open questions. NOAM GREENBERG, The information common to relatively random sequences. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. E-mail: noam.greenberg@vuw.ac.nz. If X and Y are relatively random, what common information can X and Y have? We use algorithmic randomness and computability theory to make sense of this question. The answer involves some unexpected ingredients, such as the Lebesgue density theorem, and linear programming, and reveals a rich hierarchy of Turing degrees within the K -trivial degrees. BENOÎT MONIN, The computational content of Miliken’s tree theorem. Créteil University, Créteil, France. E-mail: benoit.monin@computability.fr. The Milliken’s tree theorem is an extension of Ramsey’s theorem to trees. It implies for instance that if we assign to all the sets of two strings of the same length, one among k colors, there is an infinite binary tree within which every pair of strings of the same height has the same color. We are going to present some results on Milliken’s tree theorem from the viewpoint of computability theory and reverse mathematics. LUCA MOTTO ROS, Generalized descriptive set theory for all cofinalities, and some applications. University of Turin, Turin, Italy. E-mail: luca.mottoros@unito.it. Generalized descriptive set theory is nowadays a very active field of research. The idea is to develop a higher analogue of classical descriptive set theory in which is systematically replaced with an uncountable cardinal κ. With a few exceptions, papers in this area tend to concentrate on the case of regular cardinals. This is because under such an assumption one can easily generalize a number of basic facts and techniques from the classical setup, but from the theoretical viewpoint the choice is indeed not fully justified. In this talk I will survey some recent work in which the theory is instead developed in a uniform and cofinality-independent way, thus naturally including the case of singular cardinals. I will also consider some interesting applications connecting generalized descriptive set theory to Shelah’s stability theory (in the case of regular cardinals), and to the study of nonseparable complete metric spaces under Woodin’s axiom IO (in the case of singular cardinals of countable cofinality). FRANK PFENNING, Adjoint logic. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. E-mail: fp@cs.cmu.edu. We introduce adjoint logic as a general framework for integrating logics with different structural properties, that is, admitting or denying exchange, weakening, or contraction among the hypotheses. We investigate its proof-theoretic properties from two angles: proof construction and proof reduction. The former is the basis for applications in logical 272 LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 frameworks and logic programming, while the latter provides computational interpretations in functional and concurrent programming.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bsl.2022.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
受邀参加第31届Gödel年度讲座ELISABETH BOUSCAREN,构型在模型理论中的普遍性。法国巴黎萨克莱cnrs大学。电子邮件:elisabeth.bouscaren@universite-paris-saclay.fr。最初在分类理论,然后在几何稳定性,现在,超越稳定性,在Tame模型理论,一个共同的基本特征是识别和研究一些几何构型,组合和量纲理论的性质。它们可以证明一个理论的组合复杂性和模型论复杂性,或表明特定可定义代数结构的存在。这使得模型理论能够解决各种各样的问题。我们将尝试通过一些示例来说明这些配置的重要性。特邀教程摘要KRZYSZTOF KRUPIŃSKI,拓扑动力学中的模型理论。波兰Wrocław, Wrocław大学。电子邮件:kkrup@math.uni.wroc.pl。Newelski在2000年代中期将拓扑动力学的一些基本概念和方法引入到模型理论中。在我的教程的第一部分,我将记得拓扑动力学的一些基本概念,讨论出现自然的流动模型理论(如各种空间的类型),和给应用程序的基本拓扑动态等集团覆盖Newelski的结果:如果一个א0-saturated Xn集团是由许多0-type-definable可数集,n∈,然后对一些有限⊆G和n∈,G = AXnX 1 n。在第二部分中,我将定义流的Ellis半群和Ellis群,并重点讨论模型论中自然流的Ellis群与可定义群(模型论连通分量商)或一阶理论(一阶理论的伽罗瓦群以及强类型空间)的某些不变量之间的联系。特别地,我将讨论Pillay, Rzepecki和我自己的结果,这些结果将这种不变量作为紧(Hausdorff)群的商(它们是Ellis群的正则Hausdorff商)。这就有了Pillay, Rzepecki和我自己得到的各种结果,例如,它得出了一个一般的结果,即定义在单个完备类型上的有界不变等价关系的模型论类型可定义性等价于该关系的描述集论平滑性。在最后一部分中,我将讨论由Lee、Moconja和我本人提出的kechris - pestov - todor<e:1> eviki (KPT)理论的一个可定义变体。KPT理论研究Fraïssé结构的自同构群的动力学性质与底层Fraïssé类的ramseytheory(即组合)性质之间的关系。在我们的研究中,我们的想法是找到一阶理论的动力学性质(即与该模型上各种类型空间上充分饱和模型的自同构群的作用有关的性质)与该理论的ramsey理论性质的可定义版本之间的相互作用。这导致了类似于KPT理论的各种结果(即,理论的可定义的极端适应性的组合表征),但也导致了一些相当新颖的定理,例如,产生一阶理论的Ellis群的收益性准则。本文由波兰国家科学中心资助,项目编号2015/19/B/ST1/ 01151、2016/22/E/ST1/00450、2018/31/B/ST1/00357。ANDREW MARKS,描述Borel复杂性和可分解性的应用。加州大学洛杉矶分校,美国加州洛杉矶。电子邮件:marks@math.ucla.edu。我们给出了Borel层次结构中集合Σn难的一个新的表征。利用Antonio Montalban在可计算性理论中进行优先级论证的真阶段方法证明了这一特征。我们用它来证明可分解性猜想,假设射影确定性。可分解性猜想描述了哪些Borel函数可分解为具有Πn域的部分连续函数的可数并。这是和亚当·戴的合作。ARTEM CHERNIKOV,模型理论中的措施。美国加州大学洛杉矶分校数学系,加州洛杉矶900951555电子邮件:chernikov@math.ucla.edu。URL地址:http://www.math.ucla.edu/~chernikov/。在模型理论中,类型是结构中可定义集合的布尔代数上的一个超过滤器,它与有限加性{0,1}值测度是一样的。这是一种特殊的Keisler测度,它是可定义集合的布尔代数上的有限加性实值概率测度。Keisler在80年代末提出,Keisler测量在过去十年中成为研究的中心对象。这是由几条相互交织的研究路线推动的。 其中之一(也许是最古老的一个)是概率和连续逻辑的发展。另一种是研究o-minimal中的可定义群,更普遍的是在NIP理论中,导致与拓扑动力学的有趣联系。进一步的动机来自于加法和极值组合的应用,将上述方向结合起来。我将概述这一学科的一些最新发展。[10] A. Chernikov,模型理论,Keisler测度和类群,《中国科学》,vol. 24 (2018), no. 1。3,第336-339页。[10] A. Chernikov和K. Gannon,可定义卷积和幂等Keisler测度。以色列数学学报,2021,arXiv:2004.10378。[10]刘建军,刘建军,刘建军,张建军,张建军,张建军,张建军,张建军,张建军,张建军,张建军,张建军。[b] A. Chernikov和P. Simon,明确可服从的NIP组。《美国数学学会学报》,2018年第31卷,第2期。3,第609-641页。[10] A. Chernikov和S. Starchenko,远端结构的正则引理。《欧洲数学学会学报》,2018年第20卷,第2期。10,第2437-2466页。[10]张建军,张建军。超图正则性与vc维的关系,中国科学:自然科学版,2016,37(4):726 - 726。维拉费希尔,实数的组合集。维也纳大学,奥地利维也纳。电子邮件:vera.fischer@univie.ac.at。实数的无限组合集,如几乎不相交族、共有限群、独立族和塔,在实数线的集合论性质的研究中占有中心地位。特别感兴趣的是这样的实数的极值集,即,在包含下最大的组合集,关于期望的性质,它们的可能的基数,可定义性,以及ZFC依赖的存在或不存在。对这种实数组合集的研究与各种强迫技术的发展密切相关。在这次演讲中,我们将看到这个主题的一些最新进展,并指出一些有趣的悬而未决的问题。相对随机序列共有的信息。惠灵顿维多利亚大学,新西兰惠灵顿。电子邮件:noam.greenberg@vuw.ac.nz。如果X和Y是相对随机的,那么X和Y有什么共同的信息?我们使用算法随机性和可计算性理论来解释这个问题。答案涉及一些意想不到的成分,如勒贝格密度定理和线性规划,并揭示了K平凡度中丰富的图灵度层次。BENOÎT莫宁,米利肯树定理的计算内容。克兰斯泰伊大学,克兰斯泰伊,法国。电子邮件:benoit.monin@computability.fr。密立肯树定理是拉姆齐定理在树上的推广。例如,它意味着如果我们对两个长度相同的字符串的所有集合赋值,其中一个在k种颜色中,存在一个无限二叉树其中每一对高度相同的字符串都具有相同的颜色。我们将从可计算性理论和逆向数学的角度给出关于密立肯树定理的一些结果。全共性的广义描述集理论及其应用。都灵大学,意大利都灵。电子邮件:luca.mottoros@unito.it。广义描述集合论是当今一个非常活跃的研究领域。这个想法是发展一个经典描述性集合理论的高级模拟,其中系统地用不可数基数κ代替。除了少数例外,这一领域的论文往往集中在常规枢机的情况下。这是因为在这样的假设下,人们可以很容易地从经典设置中概括出一些基本事实和技术,但从理论的角度来看,这种选择确实是不完全合理的。在这次演讲中,我将调查一些最近的工作,在这些工作中,理论以统一的和非共性的方式发展,因此自然包括奇异基数的情况。我还将考虑一些有趣的应用,将广义描述性集合理论与Shelah的稳定性理论(在正则基数的情况下)以及在Woodin公理IO下的不可分完全度量空间的研究(在可数共通性的奇异基数的情况下)联系起来。伴随逻辑。卡耐基梅隆大学,美国宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡。电子邮件:fp@cs.cmu.edu。我们引入伴随逻辑作为整合具有不同结构性质的逻辑的一般框架,即承认或否认假设之间的交换、弱化或收缩。我们从证明构造和证明约简两个角度研究了它的证明理论性质。 前者是逻辑框架和逻辑编程应用的基础,而后者在函数式和并发编程中提供计算解释。
2021 EUROPEAN SUMMER MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR SYMBOLIC LOGIC LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań, Poland July 19–24, 2021
of the invited 31st Annual Gödel Lecture ELISABETH BOUSCAREN, The ubiquity of configurations in model theory. CNRS—Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. E-mail: elisabeth.bouscaren@universite-paris-saclay.fr. Originally in Classification Theory, then in Geometric Stability, and now, beyond Stability, in Tame Model Theory, one common essential feature is the identification and study of some geometric configurations, of combinatorial and dimensional theoretic nature. They can witness the combinatorial and the model theoretic complexity of a theory or indicate the existence of specific definable algebraic structures. This enables model theory to tackle questions from very diverse subjects. We will attempt to illustrate the importance of these configurations through some examples. Abstract of invited tutorialsof invited tutorials KRZYSZTOF KRUPIŃSKI, Topological dynamics in model theory. University of Wrocław, Wrocław, Poland. E-mail: kkrup@math.uni.wroc.pl. Some fundamental notions and methods of topological dynamics were introduced to model theory by Newelski in the mid-2000s. In the first part of my tutorial, I will recall some basic notions of topological dynamics, discuss the flows which appear naturally in model theory (as various spaces of types), and give applications of basic topological dynamics to some group covering results of Newelski such as: if an א0-saturated group is covered by countably many 0-type-definable sets Xn , n ∈ , then for some finite A ⊆ G and n ∈ , G = AXnX –1 n . In the second part, I will define the Ellis semigroup and Ellis group of a flow, and focus on connections between the Ellis groups of natural flows in model theory and certain invariants of definable groups (quotients by model-theoretic connected components) or first order theories (Galois groups of first order theories as well as spaces of strong types). In particular, I will discuss the results of Pillay, Rzepecki, and myself which present certain invariants of this kind as quotients of compact (Hausdorff) groups (which are canonical Hausdorff quotients of Ellis groups). This has various consequences obtained by Pillay, Rzepecki, and myself, e.g., it leads to a general result that model-theoretic type-definability of a bounded invariant equivalence relation defined on a single complete type over ∅ is equivalent to descriptive set theoretic smoothness of this relation. 270 LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 In the last part, I will discuss a definable variant of Kechris–Pestov–Todorčević (KPT) theory, developed by Lee, Moconja, and myself. KPT theory studies relationships between dynamical properties of the groups of automorphisms of Fraïssé structures and Ramseytheoretic (so combinatorial) properties of the underlying Fraïssé classes. In our research, the idea is to find interactions between dynamical properties of first order theories (i.e., properties related to the actions of the automorphism group of a sufficiently saturated model on various types spaces over this model) and definable versions of Ramsey-theoretic properties of the theory. This leads to analogs of various results of KPT theory (i.e., a combinatorial characterization of the definable extreme amenability of a theory), but also to some rather novel theorems, e.g., yielding criteria for profiniteness of the Ellis group of a first order theory. The author is supported by National Science Center, Poland, grants 2015/19/B/ST1/ 01151, 2016/22/E/ST1/00450, and 2018/31/B/ST1/00357. ANDREW MARKS, Characterizing Borel complexity and an application to decomposability. University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. E-mail: marks@math.ucla.edu. We give a new characterization of when sets in the Borel hierarchy are Σn hard. This characterization is proved using Antonio Montalban’s true stages method for conducting priority arguments in computability theory. We use this to prove the decomposability conjecture, assuming projective determinacy. The decomposability conjecture describes what Borel functions are decomposable into a countable union of partial continuous functions with Πn domains. This is joint work with Adam Day. Abstracts of invited keynote lecturess of invited keynote lectures ARTEM CHERNIKOV, Measures in model theory. Department of Mathematics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 900951555, USA. E-mail: chernikov@math.ucla.edu. URL Address: http://www.math.ucla.edu/~chernikov/. In model theory, a type is an ultrafilter on the Boolean algebra of definable sets in a structure, which is the same thing as a finitely additive {0, 1}-valued measure. This is a special kind of a Keisler measure, which is just a finitely additive real-valued probability measure on the Boolean algebra of definable sets. Introduced by Keisler in the late 80s, Keisler measures became a central object of study in the last decade. This is motivated by several intertwined lines of research. One of them (and perhaps the oldest one) is the development of probabilistic and continuous logics. Another is the study of definable groups in o-minimal, and more generally in NIP theories, leading to interesting connections with topological dynamics. Further motivation comes from applications in additive and in extremal combinatorics, uniting the aforementioned directions. I will survey some of the recent developments in the subject. [1] A. Chernikov, Model theory, Keisler measures and groups, this Journal, vol. 24 (2018), no. 3, pp. 336–339. [2] A. Chernikov and K. Gannon, Definable convolution and idempotent Keisler measures. Israel Journal of Mathematics, to appear, 2021, arXiv:2004.10378. [3] A. Chernikov, E. Hrushovski, A. Kruckman, K. Krupinski, S. Moconja, A. Pillay, and N. Ramsey, Invariant measures in simple and in small theories, preprint, 2021, arXiv:2105.07281. [4] A. Chernikov and P. Simon, Definably amenable NIP groups. Journal of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 31 (2018), no. 3, pp. 609–641. [5] A. Chernikov and S. Starchenko, Regularity lemma for distal structures. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, vol. 20 (2018), no. 10, pp. 2437–2466. [6] A. Chernikov and H. Towsner, Hypergraph regularity and higher arity VC-dimension, preprint, 2020, arXiv:2010.00726. LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 271 VERA FISCHER, Combinatorial sets of reals. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. E-mail: vera.fischer@univie.ac.at. Infinitary combinatorial sets of reals, such as almost disjoint families, cofinitary groups, independent families, and towers, occupy a central place in the study of the set-theoretic properties of the real line. Of particular interest are such extremal sets of reals, i.e., combinatorial sets which are maximal under inclusion with respect to a desired property, their possible cardinalities, definability properties, as well as the existence or non-existence of ZFC dependences. The study of such combinatorial sets of reals is closely connected with the development of a broad spectrum of forcing techniques. In this talk we will see some recent advances in the subject and point towards interesting remaining open questions. NOAM GREENBERG, The information common to relatively random sequences. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. E-mail: noam.greenberg@vuw.ac.nz. If X and Y are relatively random, what common information can X and Y have? We use algorithmic randomness and computability theory to make sense of this question. The answer involves some unexpected ingredients, such as the Lebesgue density theorem, and linear programming, and reveals a rich hierarchy of Turing degrees within the K -trivial degrees. BENOÎT MONIN, The computational content of Miliken’s tree theorem. Créteil University, Créteil, France. E-mail: benoit.monin@computability.fr. The Milliken’s tree theorem is an extension of Ramsey’s theorem to trees. It implies for instance that if we assign to all the sets of two strings of the same length, one among k colors, there is an infinite binary tree within which every pair of strings of the same height has the same color. We are going to present some results on Milliken’s tree theorem from the viewpoint of computability theory and reverse mathematics. LUCA MOTTO ROS, Generalized descriptive set theory for all cofinalities, and some applications. University of Turin, Turin, Italy. E-mail: luca.mottoros@unito.it. Generalized descriptive set theory is nowadays a very active field of research. The idea is to develop a higher analogue of classical descriptive set theory in which is systematically replaced with an uncountable cardinal κ. With a few exceptions, papers in this area tend to concentrate on the case of regular cardinals. This is because under such an assumption one can easily generalize a number of basic facts and techniques from the classical setup, but from the theoretical viewpoint the choice is indeed not fully justified. In this talk I will survey some recent work in which the theory is instead developed in a uniform and cofinality-independent way, thus naturally including the case of singular cardinals. I will also consider some interesting applications connecting generalized descriptive set theory to Shelah’s stability theory (in the case of regular cardinals), and to the study of nonseparable complete metric spaces under Woodin’s axiom IO (in the case of singular cardinals of countable cofinality). FRANK PFENNING, Adjoint logic. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. E-mail: fp@cs.cmu.edu. We introduce adjoint logic as a general framework for integrating logics with different structural properties, that is, admitting or denying exchange, weakening, or contraction among the hypotheses. We investigate its proof-theoretic properties from two angles: proof construction and proof reduction. The former is the basis for applications in logical 272 LOGIC COLLOQUIUM ’21 frameworks and logic programming, while the latter provides computational interpretations in functional and concurrent programming.