{"title":"带走蓝调:《新黑人》第二版","authors":"P. Hulme","doi":"10.1093/melus/mlac036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The early publication history of Alain Locke’s The New Negro: An Interpretation (1925)—universally regarded as the key text for what later became known as the Harlem Renaissance—is well-known in its general outlines. After a dinner at the Civic Club in Greenwich Village on 21 March 1924, organized by Charles S. Johnson (editor of Opportunity magazine) with Locke as master of ceremonies, Paul Kellogg (editor of Survey Graphic magazine) suggested a special issue to showcase the new work he had just heard about. Locke was enlisted as guest editor. Harlem: Mecca of the New Negro appeared on 1 March 1925. A considerably expanded version followed in book form in December that year as The New Negro, with a second printing in March 1927 completing the textual trilogy. Here, I suggest that the seemingly innocuous phrase “second printing” in fact conceals some significant fault lines in Black cultural politics that shed light on the equivocal position of jazz and the blues in the 1920s. In particular, I attend to the underacknowledged importance of the Mexican artist Miguel Covarrubias. Walter White, assistant national secretary of the NAACP, first glimpsed the potential for expanding the Survey Graphic special issue into a book. In January 1925—well before the actual appearance of Harlem—White telephoned Lewis Baer, chief editor at Albert and Charles Boni Publishers, and Albert Boni then called Kellogg to inquire whether it would be possible to publish the contents of that special issue in book form. Boni soon decided that he wanted what Kellogg characterized to Locke in a 20 March 1925 letter as “a much more formidable volume,” twice the size of the Survey Graphic issue, its scope the cultural ......................................................................................................","PeriodicalId":44959,"journal":{"name":"MELUS","volume":"5 1","pages":"1 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking the Blues Away: The Second Edition of The New Negro\",\"authors\":\"P. Hulme\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/melus/mlac036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The early publication history of Alain Locke’s The New Negro: An Interpretation (1925)—universally regarded as the key text for what later became known as the Harlem Renaissance—is well-known in its general outlines. After a dinner at the Civic Club in Greenwich Village on 21 March 1924, organized by Charles S. Johnson (editor of Opportunity magazine) with Locke as master of ceremonies, Paul Kellogg (editor of Survey Graphic magazine) suggested a special issue to showcase the new work he had just heard about. Locke was enlisted as guest editor. Harlem: Mecca of the New Negro appeared on 1 March 1925. A considerably expanded version followed in book form in December that year as The New Negro, with a second printing in March 1927 completing the textual trilogy. Here, I suggest that the seemingly innocuous phrase “second printing” in fact conceals some significant fault lines in Black cultural politics that shed light on the equivocal position of jazz and the blues in the 1920s. In particular, I attend to the underacknowledged importance of the Mexican artist Miguel Covarrubias. Walter White, assistant national secretary of the NAACP, first glimpsed the potential for expanding the Survey Graphic special issue into a book. In January 1925—well before the actual appearance of Harlem—White telephoned Lewis Baer, chief editor at Albert and Charles Boni Publishers, and Albert Boni then called Kellogg to inquire whether it would be possible to publish the contents of that special issue in book form. Boni soon decided that he wanted what Kellogg characterized to Locke in a 20 March 1925 letter as “a much more formidable volume,” twice the size of the Survey Graphic issue, its scope the cultural ......................................................................................................\",\"PeriodicalId\":44959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MELUS\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MELUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlac036\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MELUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/melus/mlac036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
阿兰·洛克的《新黑人:一种解释》(1925)的早期出版历史——被普遍认为是后来被称为哈莱姆文艺复兴的关键文本——以其大致轮廓而闻名。1924年3月21日,在格林威治村的公民俱乐部,由Charles S. Johnson(《机遇》杂志的编辑)组织的晚宴上,骆家辉担任仪式主持人,Paul Kellogg(《调查图形》杂志的编辑)建议出一期特刊来展示他刚刚听说的新作品。骆家辉被任命为客座编辑。哈莱姆:新黑人的麦加出现于1925年3月1日。同年12月,一个相当扩大的版本以书的形式出版,名为《新黑人》,1927年3月第二次印刷,完成了文本三部曲。在这里,我认为“第二次印刷”这个看似无害的短语实际上隐藏了黑人文化政治中一些重要的断层线,这些断层线揭示了20世纪20年代爵士乐和蓝调的模棱两可地位。我特别关注墨西哥艺术家米格尔·科瓦鲁比亚斯(Miguel Covarrubias)被低估的重要性。Walter White,全国有色人种协进会的助理秘书,第一个看到了将《调查图表》特刊扩展成一本书的潜力。1925年1月——早在哈莱姆真正出现之前——怀特打电话给阿尔伯特和查尔斯·博尼出版社的主编刘易斯·贝尔,艾伯特·博尼随后打电话给凯洛格,询问是否有可能将那期特刊的内容以书的形式出版。Boni很快就决定,他希望什么特征凯洛格洛克在1925年3月20日的信”更强大的音量,“两次调查的图形的大小问题,其范围的文化 ......................................................................................................
Taking the Blues Away: The Second Edition of The New Negro
The early publication history of Alain Locke’s The New Negro: An Interpretation (1925)—universally regarded as the key text for what later became known as the Harlem Renaissance—is well-known in its general outlines. After a dinner at the Civic Club in Greenwich Village on 21 March 1924, organized by Charles S. Johnson (editor of Opportunity magazine) with Locke as master of ceremonies, Paul Kellogg (editor of Survey Graphic magazine) suggested a special issue to showcase the new work he had just heard about. Locke was enlisted as guest editor. Harlem: Mecca of the New Negro appeared on 1 March 1925. A considerably expanded version followed in book form in December that year as The New Negro, with a second printing in March 1927 completing the textual trilogy. Here, I suggest that the seemingly innocuous phrase “second printing” in fact conceals some significant fault lines in Black cultural politics that shed light on the equivocal position of jazz and the blues in the 1920s. In particular, I attend to the underacknowledged importance of the Mexican artist Miguel Covarrubias. Walter White, assistant national secretary of the NAACP, first glimpsed the potential for expanding the Survey Graphic special issue into a book. In January 1925—well before the actual appearance of Harlem—White telephoned Lewis Baer, chief editor at Albert and Charles Boni Publishers, and Albert Boni then called Kellogg to inquire whether it would be possible to publish the contents of that special issue in book form. Boni soon decided that he wanted what Kellogg characterized to Locke in a 20 March 1925 letter as “a much more formidable volume,” twice the size of the Survey Graphic issue, its scope the cultural ......................................................................................................