评价意义与衔接:科技写作中评价意义的结构功能

IF 0.5 Q3 LINGUISTICS

Discours-Revue de Linguistique Psycholinguistique et Informatique Pub Date : 2015-09-09 DOI:10.4000/DISCOURS.9053

Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb

{"title":"评价意义与衔接:科技写作中评价意义的结构功能","authors":"Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb","doi":"10.4000/DISCOURS.9053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a diachronic study of evaluative meaning in scientific writing, focusing on evaluative expressions that possibly serve the interpersonal as well as the textual metafunction in terms of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). These are expressions such as importantly or obviously used in sentence-initial position to evaluate what follows but which also establish a cohesive link with the adjacent discourse. For the analysis, the SciTex corpus, comprising nine scientific disciplines, was used. The data were analyzed in macro and micro-analytical steps combining quantitative and qualitative analyses. This allows us to observe generalizable trends as well as fine-grained distinctions.","PeriodicalId":51977,"journal":{"name":"Discours-Revue de Linguistique Psycholinguistique et Informatique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluative Meaning and Cohesion: The Structuring Function of Evaluative Meaning in Scientific Writing\",\"authors\":\"Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb\",\"doi\":\"10.4000/DISCOURS.9053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a diachronic study of evaluative meaning in scientific writing, focusing on evaluative expressions that possibly serve the interpersonal as well as the textual metafunction in terms of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). These are expressions such as importantly or obviously used in sentence-initial position to evaluate what follows but which also establish a cohesive link with the adjacent discourse. For the analysis, the SciTex corpus, comprising nine scientific disciplines, was used. The data were analyzed in macro and micro-analytical steps combining quantitative and qualitative analyses. This allows us to observe generalizable trends as well as fine-grained distinctions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discours-Revue de Linguistique Psycholinguistique et Informatique\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discours-Revue de Linguistique Psycholinguistique et Informatique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4000/DISCOURS.9053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discours-Revue de Linguistique Psycholinguistique et Informatique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/DISCOURS.9053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文从系统功能语言学的角度对科学写作中的评价意义进行了历时性研究，重点研究了可能服务于人际关系和语篇元功能的评价表达。这些短语如important或obvious用于句子开头位置，用来评价后面的内容，但也与相邻的话语建立起衔接联系。为了进行分析，使用了包含9个科学学科的SciTex语料库。采用定量与定性相结合的宏观与微观分析方法对数据进行分析。这使我们能够观察到可概括的趋势以及细粒度的区别。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Evaluative Meaning and Cohesion: The Structuring Function of Evaluative Meaning in Scientific Writing

We present a diachronic study of evaluative meaning in scientific writing, focusing on evaluative expressions that possibly serve the interpersonal as well as the textual metafunction in terms of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL). These are expressions such as importantly or obviously used in sentence-initial position to evaluate what follows but which also establish a cohesive link with the adjacent discourse. For the analysis, the SciTex corpus, comprising nine scientific disciplines, was used. The data were analyzed in macro and micro-analytical steps combining quantitative and qualitative analyses. This allows us to observe generalizable trends as well as fine-grained distinctions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Discours-Revue de Linguistique Psycholinguistique et Informatique LINGUISTICS-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks