挪威早期扫盲教育的对话空间

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Atle Skaftun, Arne Olav Nygard, Å. K. H. Wagner
{"title":"挪威早期扫盲教育的对话空间","authors":"Atle Skaftun, Arne Olav Nygard, Å. K. H. Wagner","doi":"10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores and analyses conditions for student participation in Norwegian Year Two classrooms. It is inspired by the concept of dialogic space (Wegerif, 2013) and by Segal and Lefstein’s (2016) model for the realization of student voice. Six classrooms were observed for one week. This yielded field notes and summaries from 105 lessons across all subjects and video data from all 47 Norwegian (L1) lessons. Our analyses show that there is practically no pair or group work and that station work is predominantly silent, leaving whole-class teaching as the most prominent space for dialogue. Our analyses aim to identify events in whole-class teaching with dialogic potential, i.e., where the interaction displays features that might indicate a shift from recitation to conversation (Nystrand & Gamoran, 1991). In these conversa- tional events, we find increased teacher dominance when dealing with disciplinary content. When students are given the floor, the focus tends to be on non- disciplinary content. Students’ talk about texts and disciplinary ideas is suggested as a productive ground for creating dialogic space in early-years literacy education.","PeriodicalId":43406,"journal":{"name":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dialogic space in Norwegian early-years literacy education\",\"authors\":\"Atle Skaftun, Arne Olav Nygard, Å. K. H. Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores and analyses conditions for student participation in Norwegian Year Two classrooms. It is inspired by the concept of dialogic space (Wegerif, 2013) and by Segal and Lefstein’s (2016) model for the realization of student voice. Six classrooms were observed for one week. This yielded field notes and summaries from 105 lessons across all subjects and video data from all 47 Norwegian (L1) lessons. Our analyses show that there is practically no pair or group work and that station work is predominantly silent, leaving whole-class teaching as the most prominent space for dialogue. Our analyses aim to identify events in whole-class teaching with dialogic potential, i.e., where the interaction displays features that might indicate a shift from recitation to conversation (Nystrand & Gamoran, 1991). In these conversa- tional events, we find increased teacher dominance when dealing with disciplinary content. When students are given the floor, the focus tends to be on non- disciplinary content. Students’ talk about texts and disciplinary ideas is suggested as a productive ground for creating dialogic space in early-years literacy education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究探讨并分析挪威二年级课堂学生参与的条件。它的灵感来自对话空间的概念(Wegerif, 2013)和Segal和Lefstein(2016)的学生声音实现模型。对六个教室进行了为期一周的观察。这产生了所有科目的105节课的现场笔记和总结,以及所有47节挪威语(L1)课的视频数据。我们的分析表明,几乎没有结对或小组作业,工作站作业主要是沉默的,使全班教学成为最突出的对话空间。我们的分析旨在识别课堂教学中具有对话潜力的事件,即互动表现出可能表明从背诵到对话转变的特征(Nystrand & Gamoran, 1991)。在这些会话事件中,我们发现教师在处理学科内容时的主导地位增加了。当学生有机会发言时,重点往往放在非学科的内容上。在早期扫盲教育中,学生对文本和学科思想的讨论是创造对话空间的有效基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dialogic space in Norwegian early-years literacy education
This study explores and analyses conditions for student participation in Norwegian Year Two classrooms. It is inspired by the concept of dialogic space (Wegerif, 2013) and by Segal and Lefstein’s (2016) model for the realization of student voice. Six classrooms were observed for one week. This yielded field notes and summaries from 105 lessons across all subjects and video data from all 47 Norwegian (L1) lessons. Our analyses show that there is practically no pair or group work and that station work is predominantly silent, leaving whole-class teaching as the most prominent space for dialogue. Our analyses aim to identify events in whole-class teaching with dialogic potential, i.e., where the interaction displays features that might indicate a shift from recitation to conversation (Nystrand & Gamoran, 1991). In these conversa- tional events, we find increased teacher dominance when dealing with disciplinary content. When students are given the floor, the focus tends to be on non- disciplinary content. Students’ talk about texts and disciplinary ideas is suggested as a productive ground for creating dialogic space in early-years literacy education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature
L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信