{"title":"特里斯坦·里维尔迪:语料库的神话树","authors":"Grigoriu Brîndușa","doi":"10.35218/armca.2020.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In most of its European versions of the central Middle Ages, Tristan\nnurtures an arborescent dynamics in which human agents reveal a spectacular\npotential for vegetalization, from the living couple to its tombal avatars, from\nthe French poems to the Norse and German adaptations of a greening\nnarrative matter (Pastré 1999, Victorin 2009).\nWhile exploring the affinities between the romance’s modeling of human ethos\nand its stylization of sylvan, vegetal figures under the sign of the philter, the\npresent article focuses on the metamorphosis of the love tree in Béroul’s, Marie\nde France’s, Eilhart von Oberg’s and Robert’s realms of Tristania.\nIn Béroul’s version, the couple fuses into an Edenic matrix where sleeping\nbecomes an ensavaging, liberating process excluding the possibility of\ncorporeal fecundity. (Marchello-Nizia 1981). Marie de France takes the idea of\na refuted genealogy one step further, via the symbiosis of the honeysuckle and\nthe hazel tree; this vegetal self-sufficiency excludes God’s commandments by\nsuppressing the mere possibility of achieving a living descendance. In Eilhart’s\nromance, death is the catalyzer of a revegetation of the consubstantial souls of\nthe lovers, as they are transcendentally reunited by the philter. Robert’s Saga\ncrowns the textual regeneration of the Tristanian matter by resignifying its\ndistinctive sign of mythical arborescence.","PeriodicalId":37287,"journal":{"name":"Anastasis","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tristan en reverdie: l’arborescence mythique d’un corpus\",\"authors\":\"Grigoriu Brîndușa\",\"doi\":\"10.35218/armca.2020.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In most of its European versions of the central Middle Ages, Tristan\\nnurtures an arborescent dynamics in which human agents reveal a spectacular\\npotential for vegetalization, from the living couple to its tombal avatars, from\\nthe French poems to the Norse and German adaptations of a greening\\nnarrative matter (Pastré 1999, Victorin 2009).\\nWhile exploring the affinities between the romance’s modeling of human ethos\\nand its stylization of sylvan, vegetal figures under the sign of the philter, the\\npresent article focuses on the metamorphosis of the love tree in Béroul’s, Marie\\nde France’s, Eilhart von Oberg’s and Robert’s realms of Tristania.\\nIn Béroul’s version, the couple fuses into an Edenic matrix where sleeping\\nbecomes an ensavaging, liberating process excluding the possibility of\\ncorporeal fecundity. (Marchello-Nizia 1981). Marie de France takes the idea of\\na refuted genealogy one step further, via the symbiosis of the honeysuckle and\\nthe hazel tree; this vegetal self-sufficiency excludes God’s commandments by\\nsuppressing the mere possibility of achieving a living descendance. In Eilhart’s\\nromance, death is the catalyzer of a revegetation of the consubstantial souls of\\nthe lovers, as they are transcendentally reunited by the philter. Robert’s Saga\\ncrowns the textual regeneration of the Tristanian matter by resignifying its\\ndistinctive sign of mythical arborescence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anastasis\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anastasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35218/armca.2020.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anastasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35218/armca.2020.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在大多数欧洲版本的中世纪中期,tristan描绘了一种树木的动态,在这种动态中,人类主体揭示了一种惊人的植被化潜力,从活着的夫妇到坟墓的化身,从法国诗歌到挪威和德国对绿色叙事事件的改编(pastr 1999, victoria In 2009)。在探索浪漫主义对人类行为的塑造与对森林、植物形象的风格化之间的联系的同时,本文重点研究了b roul、Mariede France、Eilhart von Oberg和Robert Tristania王国中爱情树的变形。在bassimroul的版本中,这对夫妇融合成一个伊甸园的矩阵,在那里,睡觉变成了一种野蛮、解放的过程,排除了生育的可能性。(Marchello-Nizia 1981)。玛丽·德·弗朗斯通过金银花和榛子树的共生关系,进一步论证了被驳倒的谱系理论;这种植物人的自给自足通过压制获得活的后代的可能性而排除了上帝的诫命。在埃尔哈特的浪漫小说中,死亡是情侣们同体灵魂重新生长的催化剂,因为他们通过死亡超然地团聚了。罗伯特的《圣歌》通过重新定义其独特的神话树的标志,为特里斯坦问题的文本再生提供了冠冕。
Tristan en reverdie: l’arborescence mythique d’un corpus
In most of its European versions of the central Middle Ages, Tristan
nurtures an arborescent dynamics in which human agents reveal a spectacular
potential for vegetalization, from the living couple to its tombal avatars, from
the French poems to the Norse and German adaptations of a greening
narrative matter (Pastré 1999, Victorin 2009).
While exploring the affinities between the romance’s modeling of human ethos
and its stylization of sylvan, vegetal figures under the sign of the philter, the
present article focuses on the metamorphosis of the love tree in Béroul’s, Marie
de France’s, Eilhart von Oberg’s and Robert’s realms of Tristania.
In Béroul’s version, the couple fuses into an Edenic matrix where sleeping
becomes an ensavaging, liberating process excluding the possibility of
corporeal fecundity. (Marchello-Nizia 1981). Marie de France takes the idea of
a refuted genealogy one step further, via the symbiosis of the honeysuckle and
the hazel tree; this vegetal self-sufficiency excludes God’s commandments by
suppressing the mere possibility of achieving a living descendance. In Eilhart’s
romance, death is the catalyzer of a revegetation of the consubstantial souls of
the lovers, as they are transcendentally reunited by the philter. Robert’s Saga
crowns the textual regeneration of the Tristanian matter by resignifying its
distinctive sign of mythical arborescence.