{"title":"ADA/EASD共识算法对初级保健医生治疗2型糖尿病的影响:四个关键点","authors":"Charles F. Shaefer Jr. MD, FACP, FCCP","doi":"10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80028-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is appearing in adults at an epidemic rate. Primary care clinicians will, out of necessity, provide diabetes care for most patients with type 2 DM. A systematic care plan will contribute to effective and cost-efficient management of the increasing number of diabetic patients presenting in the primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> The aims of this article were to review the consensus algorithm developed by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD) for the treatment of type 2 DM and to increase awareness of this document within the community that is most likely to manage patients with type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Research was focused on the value of the consensus algorithm to primary care practitioners for the management of patients with type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Research revealed 4 aspects of the algorithm involving use of medications (including insulin) and measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin levels that would help health care providers construct a systematic and workable plan for aggressive treatment of type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The 4 issues raised within the ADA/EASD consensus algorithm have a significant impact on primary care practitioners and challenge usual practices in the care of patients with type 2 DM.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100678,"journal":{"name":"Insulin","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 126-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80028-0","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implications of the ADA/EASD consensus algorithm for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus for primary care practitioners: Four pivotal points\",\"authors\":\"Charles F. Shaefer Jr. MD, FACP, FCCP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80028-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Background:</strong> Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is appearing in adults at an epidemic rate. Primary care clinicians will, out of necessity, provide diabetes care for most patients with type 2 DM. A systematic care plan will contribute to effective and cost-efficient management of the increasing number of diabetic patients presenting in the primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives:</strong> The aims of this article were to review the consensus algorithm developed by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD) for the treatment of type 2 DM and to increase awareness of this document within the community that is most likely to manage patients with type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Research was focused on the value of the consensus algorithm to primary care practitioners for the management of patients with type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> Research revealed 4 aspects of the algorithm involving use of medications (including insulin) and measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin levels that would help health care providers construct a systematic and workable plan for aggressive treatment of type 2 DM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The 4 issues raised within the ADA/EASD consensus algorithm have a significant impact on primary care practitioners and challenge usual practices in the care of patients with type 2 DM.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insulin\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 126-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1557-0843(08)80028-0\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insulin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557084308800280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insulin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557084308800280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implications of the ADA/EASD consensus algorithm for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus for primary care practitioners: Four pivotal points
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is appearing in adults at an epidemic rate. Primary care clinicians will, out of necessity, provide diabetes care for most patients with type 2 DM. A systematic care plan will contribute to effective and cost-efficient management of the increasing number of diabetic patients presenting in the primary care setting.
Objectives: The aims of this article were to review the consensus algorithm developed by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD) for the treatment of type 2 DM and to increase awareness of this document within the community that is most likely to manage patients with type 2 DM.
Methods: Research was focused on the value of the consensus algorithm to primary care practitioners for the management of patients with type 2 DM.
Results: Research revealed 4 aspects of the algorithm involving use of medications (including insulin) and measurement of glycosylated hemoglobin levels that would help health care providers construct a systematic and workable plan for aggressive treatment of type 2 DM.
Conclusions: The 4 issues raised within the ADA/EASD consensus algorithm have a significant impact on primary care practitioners and challenge usual practices in the care of patients with type 2 DM.