PG35最大限度地利用短期、无障碍会议进行现场手术室模拟的机会——在大流行期间吸取的经验教训

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
F. Cull, Gunjeet Dua
{"title":"PG35最大限度地利用短期、无障碍会议进行现场手术室模拟的机会——在大流行期间吸取的经验教训","authors":"F. Cull, Gunjeet Dua","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction In situ simulation in the operating theatre has potential in highlighting latent environmental threats, trialling new procedures and human factors training1. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, elective operating was cancelled, and teams formed to manage emergencies. Following the initial peak, emergency intubations reduced before elective operating could resume. Staff were therefore on-site in case of emergencies, but regularly available for training. We piloted a series of short in situ theatre simulation sessions for the multidisciplinary team. Methods The one hour sessions each comprised an introduction, case briefing, 15-minute simulation scenario and 25-minute debrief. Scenarios were medium fidelity, with some higher-fidelity practical elements maintained e.g. IV access, intubation, manual handling. Scenarios included common anaesthetic and surgical emergencies e.g. major haemorrhage, anaphylaxis. The Plus/Delta debrief model2 was used. Pre- and post-course questionnaires were undertaken, using the validated Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument (HuFSHI)3 evaluation system and a question on the perceived usefulness of the session. Data was paired and compared for service evaluation. Results 9 sessions were undertaken in 3 weeks. 93 attendances were captured, of which paired data was obtained for approximately two thirds. All participants who responded to the question ‘did you think that today’s activity was a good use of time?’ answered affirmatively. In ‘monitoring the big picture during a complex situation’, scores increased by 1.42 (t(64)=7.78, p Discussion and Conclusion These sessions aimed to reduce ‘downtime’ at a time when formal training had ceased out of necessity. Uptake of these sessions was high, and recruiting learners subjectively easier than pre-pandemic in situ training, in part due to team presence without planned activities. The abbreviated, one-hour format provided a time-efficient delivery method. The informal approach and storage of simulation equipment within a designated training theatre meant that the session was easily adapted/rearranged in case of emergencies. Elements of these sessions (short duration, informal approach) might be utilised in improving uptake and efficiency of future theatre training. Attention should be paid to addressing, rather than just identifying, gaps in knowledge or latent threats in this short time. Failing this, steps should include follow-up sessions or distribution of further learning materials. References Owei L, Neylan CJ, Rao R, et al. In Situ Operating Room-Based Simulation: A Review. Journal of Surgical Education 2017;74(4):579–588. Fanning R and Gaba D. The Role of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning. Simulation in Healthcare. 2007;2(2):115–125. Reedy G, Lavelle M, Simpson T, et al. Development of the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument: a valid and reliable tool for assessing interprofessional learning across healthcare practice settings BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning 2017;3:135–141.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PG35 Maximising opportunities for in situ operating theatre simulation with short, accessible sessions – lessons learnt during a pandemic\",\"authors\":\"F. Cull, Gunjeet Dua\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction In situ simulation in the operating theatre has potential in highlighting latent environmental threats, trialling new procedures and human factors training1. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, elective operating was cancelled, and teams formed to manage emergencies. Following the initial peak, emergency intubations reduced before elective operating could resume. Staff were therefore on-site in case of emergencies, but regularly available for training. We piloted a series of short in situ theatre simulation sessions for the multidisciplinary team. Methods The one hour sessions each comprised an introduction, case briefing, 15-minute simulation scenario and 25-minute debrief. Scenarios were medium fidelity, with some higher-fidelity practical elements maintained e.g. IV access, intubation, manual handling. Scenarios included common anaesthetic and surgical emergencies e.g. major haemorrhage, anaphylaxis. The Plus/Delta debrief model2 was used. Pre- and post-course questionnaires were undertaken, using the validated Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument (HuFSHI)3 evaluation system and a question on the perceived usefulness of the session. Data was paired and compared for service evaluation. Results 9 sessions were undertaken in 3 weeks. 93 attendances were captured, of which paired data was obtained for approximately two thirds. All participants who responded to the question ‘did you think that today’s activity was a good use of time?’ answered affirmatively. In ‘monitoring the big picture during a complex situation’, scores increased by 1.42 (t(64)=7.78, p Discussion and Conclusion These sessions aimed to reduce ‘downtime’ at a time when formal training had ceased out of necessity. Uptake of these sessions was high, and recruiting learners subjectively easier than pre-pandemic in situ training, in part due to team presence without planned activities. The abbreviated, one-hour format provided a time-efficient delivery method. The informal approach and storage of simulation equipment within a designated training theatre meant that the session was easily adapted/rearranged in case of emergencies. Elements of these sessions (short duration, informal approach) might be utilised in improving uptake and efficiency of future theatre training. Attention should be paid to addressing, rather than just identifying, gaps in knowledge or latent threats in this short time. Failing this, steps should include follow-up sessions or distribution of further learning materials. References Owei L, Neylan CJ, Rao R, et al. In Situ Operating Room-Based Simulation: A Review. Journal of Surgical Education 2017;74(4):579–588. Fanning R and Gaba D. The Role of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning. Simulation in Healthcare. 2007;2(2):115–125. Reedy G, Lavelle M, Simpson T, et al. Development of the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument: a valid and reliable tool for assessing interprofessional learning across healthcare practice settings BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning 2017;3:135–141.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-aspihconf.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术室的现场模拟在突出潜在的环境威胁、试验新程序和人为因素培训方面具有潜力。在COVID-19大流行高峰期,取消了选择性手术,并组建了应急小组。在最初的高峰之后,紧急插管减少,择期手术可以恢复。因此,工作人员在紧急情况下在现场,但定期提供培训。我们为多学科团队试点了一系列短的现场剧院模拟会议。方法每期1小时,包括介绍、病例简报、15分钟模拟情景和25分钟汇报。场景为中等保真度,保留了一些高保真度的实际元素,如静脉注射、插管、人工处理。场景包括常见的麻醉和外科紧急情况,如大出血,过敏反应。采用Plus/Delta汇报模型2。课前和课后进行问卷调查,使用经过验证的医疗器械人因技能(HuFSHI)3评估系统和一个关于课程感知有用性的问题。对数据进行配对和比较以进行服务评估。结果3周内共进行9次治疗。记录了93次出席情况,其中约三分之二获得了配对数据。所有回答“你认为今天的活动很好地利用了时间吗?”肯定地回答。在“在复杂情况下监控全局”中,得分增加了1.42 (t(64)=7.78, p)。讨论和结论这些课程旨在减少在正式培训因必要而停止时的“停机时间”。这些课程的接受度很高,主观上比大流行前的现场培训更容易招募学员,部分原因是团队在现场没有计划好的活动。缩短的一小时格式提供了一种省时的交付方法。非正式的方法和在指定的训练场地内储存模拟设备意味着在紧急情况下很容易调整/重新安排会议。这些课程的内容(短期、非正式的方法)可用于提高今后戏剧培训的吸收和效率。应注意在这短暂的时间内解决而不仅仅是确定知识方面的差距或潜在威胁。如果做不到这一点,步骤应该包括后续会议或分发进一步的学习材料。Owei L, Neylan CJ, Rao R,等。基于现场手术室的模拟:综述。外科教育杂志2017;74(4):579-588。范宁R, Gaba D.汇报在基于模拟的学习中的作用。医疗保健模拟。2007;2(2):115-125。李建军,李建军,李建军,等。发展医疗器械的人为因素技能:评估医疗实践设置跨专业学习的有效可靠工具BMJ模拟与技术增强学习2017;3:135-141。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PG35 Maximising opportunities for in situ operating theatre simulation with short, accessible sessions – lessons learnt during a pandemic
Introduction In situ simulation in the operating theatre has potential in highlighting latent environmental threats, trialling new procedures and human factors training1. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, elective operating was cancelled, and teams formed to manage emergencies. Following the initial peak, emergency intubations reduced before elective operating could resume. Staff were therefore on-site in case of emergencies, but regularly available for training. We piloted a series of short in situ theatre simulation sessions for the multidisciplinary team. Methods The one hour sessions each comprised an introduction, case briefing, 15-minute simulation scenario and 25-minute debrief. Scenarios were medium fidelity, with some higher-fidelity practical elements maintained e.g. IV access, intubation, manual handling. Scenarios included common anaesthetic and surgical emergencies e.g. major haemorrhage, anaphylaxis. The Plus/Delta debrief model2 was used. Pre- and post-course questionnaires were undertaken, using the validated Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument (HuFSHI)3 evaluation system and a question on the perceived usefulness of the session. Data was paired and compared for service evaluation. Results 9 sessions were undertaken in 3 weeks. 93 attendances were captured, of which paired data was obtained for approximately two thirds. All participants who responded to the question ‘did you think that today’s activity was a good use of time?’ answered affirmatively. In ‘monitoring the big picture during a complex situation’, scores increased by 1.42 (t(64)=7.78, p Discussion and Conclusion These sessions aimed to reduce ‘downtime’ at a time when formal training had ceased out of necessity. Uptake of these sessions was high, and recruiting learners subjectively easier than pre-pandemic in situ training, in part due to team presence without planned activities. The abbreviated, one-hour format provided a time-efficient delivery method. The informal approach and storage of simulation equipment within a designated training theatre meant that the session was easily adapted/rearranged in case of emergencies. Elements of these sessions (short duration, informal approach) might be utilised in improving uptake and efficiency of future theatre training. Attention should be paid to addressing, rather than just identifying, gaps in knowledge or latent threats in this short time. Failing this, steps should include follow-up sessions or distribution of further learning materials. References Owei L, Neylan CJ, Rao R, et al. In Situ Operating Room-Based Simulation: A Review. Journal of Surgical Education 2017;74(4):579–588. Fanning R and Gaba D. The Role of Debriefing in Simulation-Based Learning. Simulation in Healthcare. 2007;2(2):115–125. Reedy G, Lavelle M, Simpson T, et al. Development of the Human Factors Skills for Healthcare Instrument: a valid and reliable tool for assessing interprofessional learning across healthcare practice settings BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning 2017;3:135–141.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信