卡尔迪乌斯否定的物质神学

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
A. L. Moli
{"title":"卡尔迪乌斯否定的物质神学","authors":"A. L. Moli","doi":"10.7408/EPKN.V4I1.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the Fall of the Roman Empire, where it covered prominently many aspects of a cultivated citizen's life, the platonic philosophical Tradition was practically dismissed from the centre of european spiritual life and survived only in restricted corners of the new scenario designed by the barbaric invasions. This lack was deepened after 1000 A. D. when the importance of Plato's thought in Theology was replaced by the new spiritualized access which could be granted via the arabic culture to the texts of Aristotle. In many cases, the parts of the platonic tradition which persisted as a stable component of the late medieval theological Thought were those more strictly connected to the problem of the relation among the various principles which Plato posed at the basis of his cosmo-theological construction in dialectical Dialogues such as Parmenides , Philebus , Sophist and Timaeus . Trinitarian Thought as well as Christian notion of Transcendence were always been dependent on concepts which could scarcely doubted to be of platonic origin. Yet the platonic source remained for many years as well as hidden in the developing of the doctrinal System of Christianity. In particular the notion of “Transcendence” held by the so-called via negativa was never accepted as the official version of the dogma, never ceasing to encounter new opposition. This paper aims at reconstructing the reasons for that kind of incompatibility which has always been sensed by theologians between some radical metaphysical thesis developed in Platonism and the theoretical structure of Christian Thought. The perspective drafted in this paper suggests that some answers could be found in the very sense of “Tradition” ( diadoche ) adopted by Platonists as a movement of approaching to a Truth in which Christianity and Platonism are only provisional moments and in the logical structure of the via negativa as a device to conquer the (theo)logical space by removing every transcendental determination including those which should define Christian God: The One, The Good, The True. This paper's main focus is the analysis of the role of Latin Authors (both writers and thinkers) of Late Antiquity in shaping the general matrix of via negativa by comparing their intuitions and terminological innovations to those introduced during the same period by authors who wrote in Greek.","PeriodicalId":40097,"journal":{"name":"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics","volume":"24 1","pages":"00-00"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The negative Theology of Matter in Calcidius\",\"authors\":\"A. L. Moli\",\"doi\":\"10.7408/EPKN.V4I1.71\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After the Fall of the Roman Empire, where it covered prominently many aspects of a cultivated citizen's life, the platonic philosophical Tradition was practically dismissed from the centre of european spiritual life and survived only in restricted corners of the new scenario designed by the barbaric invasions. This lack was deepened after 1000 A. D. when the importance of Plato's thought in Theology was replaced by the new spiritualized access which could be granted via the arabic culture to the texts of Aristotle. In many cases, the parts of the platonic tradition which persisted as a stable component of the late medieval theological Thought were those more strictly connected to the problem of the relation among the various principles which Plato posed at the basis of his cosmo-theological construction in dialectical Dialogues such as Parmenides , Philebus , Sophist and Timaeus . Trinitarian Thought as well as Christian notion of Transcendence were always been dependent on concepts which could scarcely doubted to be of platonic origin. Yet the platonic source remained for many years as well as hidden in the developing of the doctrinal System of Christianity. In particular the notion of “Transcendence” held by the so-called via negativa was never accepted as the official version of the dogma, never ceasing to encounter new opposition. This paper aims at reconstructing the reasons for that kind of incompatibility which has always been sensed by theologians between some radical metaphysical thesis developed in Platonism and the theoretical structure of Christian Thought. The perspective drafted in this paper suggests that some answers could be found in the very sense of “Tradition” ( diadoche ) adopted by Platonists as a movement of approaching to a Truth in which Christianity and Platonism are only provisional moments and in the logical structure of the via negativa as a device to conquer the (theo)logical space by removing every transcendental determination including those which should define Christian God: The One, The Good, The True. This paper's main focus is the analysis of the role of Latin Authors (both writers and thinkers) of Late Antiquity in shaping the general matrix of via negativa by comparing their intuitions and terminological innovations to those introduced during the same period by authors who wrote in Greek.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"00-00\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7408/EPKN.V4I1.71\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7408/EPKN.V4I1.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在罗马帝国灭亡之后,柏拉图哲学传统在文明公民生活的许多方面占据了突出的地位,它实际上已经从欧洲精神生活的中心消失了,只在野蛮入侵所设计的新场景的有限角落里幸存下来。这种缺乏在公元1000年后进一步加深。D.当柏拉图思想在神学中的重要性被新的精神化的途径所取代时,这种途径可以通过阿拉伯文化获得亚里士多德的文本。在许多情况下,作为中世纪晚期神学思想的稳定组成部分的柏拉图传统,是那些更严格地与柏拉图在辩证对话中提出的各种原则之间的关系问题联系在一起的,这些原则是柏拉图在他的宇宙神学建构的基础上提出的,如巴门尼德、菲利伯斯、诡辩家和蒂迈乌斯。三位一体的思想以及基督教的超验性概念总是依赖于几乎毫无疑问是柏拉图起源的概念。然而,柏拉图的来源仍然存在了许多年,并且隐藏在基督教教义体系的发展中。特别是所谓的“通过否定”所持有的“超越”概念从未被接受为教条的正式版本,从未停止遇到新的反对意见。本文旨在重建神学家们一直感觉到柏拉图主义中某些激进的形而上学命题与基督教思想的理论结构之间不相容的原因。本文草拟的观点表明,在柏拉图主义者所采用的“传统”(diadoche)的意义上,可以找到一些答案,作为一种接近真理的运动,基督教和柏拉图主义只是暂时的时刻,在否定的逻辑结构中,作为一种征服(theo)逻辑空间的手段,通过消除所有先验的决定,包括那些应该定义基督教上帝的决定:“一”,“善”,“真”。本文的主要重点是通过比较古代晚期拉丁作家(作家和思想家)的直觉和术语创新,与同一时期用希腊语写作的作者所引入的,来分析他们在塑造否定句总体矩阵中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The negative Theology of Matter in Calcidius
After the Fall of the Roman Empire, where it covered prominently many aspects of a cultivated citizen's life, the platonic philosophical Tradition was practically dismissed from the centre of european spiritual life and survived only in restricted corners of the new scenario designed by the barbaric invasions. This lack was deepened after 1000 A. D. when the importance of Plato's thought in Theology was replaced by the new spiritualized access which could be granted via the arabic culture to the texts of Aristotle. In many cases, the parts of the platonic tradition which persisted as a stable component of the late medieval theological Thought were those more strictly connected to the problem of the relation among the various principles which Plato posed at the basis of his cosmo-theological construction in dialectical Dialogues such as Parmenides , Philebus , Sophist and Timaeus . Trinitarian Thought as well as Christian notion of Transcendence were always been dependent on concepts which could scarcely doubted to be of platonic origin. Yet the platonic source remained for many years as well as hidden in the developing of the doctrinal System of Christianity. In particular the notion of “Transcendence” held by the so-called via negativa was never accepted as the official version of the dogma, never ceasing to encounter new opposition. This paper aims at reconstructing the reasons for that kind of incompatibility which has always been sensed by theologians between some radical metaphysical thesis developed in Platonism and the theoretical structure of Christian Thought. The perspective drafted in this paper suggests that some answers could be found in the very sense of “Tradition” ( diadoche ) adopted by Platonists as a movement of approaching to a Truth in which Christianity and Platonism are only provisional moments and in the logical structure of the via negativa as a device to conquer the (theo)logical space by removing every transcendental determination including those which should define Christian God: The One, The Good, The True. This paper's main focus is the analysis of the role of Latin Authors (both writers and thinkers) of Late Antiquity in shaping the general matrix of via negativa by comparing their intuitions and terminological innovations to those introduced during the same period by authors who wrote in Greek.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信