非侵入性的页面表

Xavier Vendrell , María-José Escribà
{"title":"非侵入性的页面表","authors":"Xavier Vendrell ,&nbsp;María-José Escribà","doi":"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preimplantation genetic testing is implemented worldwide as an effective tool to avoid transmission of single gene disorders and/or chromosome abnormalities. This approach requires the obtention of representative samples from embryos in order to infer its genetic status. Nowadays, the embryo biopsy is the first-choice method for embryo sampling. Biopsy procedures are safe and widely performed in the clinical routine. However, this intervention is invasive and requires trained personnel and investment in specific equipment. Recently, new sampling methods have been suggested under the term of “non-invasive”. These approaches are based on the existence of cell-free DNA into the embryo or its environment. An increasing number of studies suggest the collection of fluid from embryos or spent culture medium to obtain cell-free DNA to assess the genetic condition of preimplantation embryos avoiding embryo biopsy. The reliability of this attractive idea needs to be confirmed and validated. In this sense, this work offers a deep review of data published to date. Several methods of DNA detection, quantification and amplification have been tested and different protocols and culture systems, with or without additional embryo manipulations, are being investigated. In general terms, an enormous variability among published results is noteworthy. Central aspects as DNA detection rates, contamination with extraembryonic DNA and concordance between results (cell-free DNA versus embryo samples) are centring proofs-of-concept and validation experiments. However, basic questions as the biological origin and representativeness of cell-free DNA are pending to be answered. Solved, unsolved and serious limitations of the new approaches are discussed. A final reflection respecting the state of the technique is offered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100911,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","volume":"8 2","pages":"Article 100101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive PGT\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Vendrell ,&nbsp;María-José Escribà\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medre.2021.100101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Preimplantation genetic testing is implemented worldwide as an effective tool to avoid transmission of single gene disorders and/or chromosome abnormalities. This approach requires the obtention of representative samples from embryos in order to infer its genetic status. Nowadays, the embryo biopsy is the first-choice method for embryo sampling. Biopsy procedures are safe and widely performed in the clinical routine. However, this intervention is invasive and requires trained personnel and investment in specific equipment. Recently, new sampling methods have been suggested under the term of “non-invasive”. These approaches are based on the existence of cell-free DNA into the embryo or its environment. An increasing number of studies suggest the collection of fluid from embryos or spent culture medium to obtain cell-free DNA to assess the genetic condition of preimplantation embryos avoiding embryo biopsy. The reliability of this attractive idea needs to be confirmed and validated. In this sense, this work offers a deep review of data published to date. Several methods of DNA detection, quantification and amplification have been tested and different protocols and culture systems, with or without additional embryo manipulations, are being investigated. In general terms, an enormous variability among published results is noteworthy. Central aspects as DNA detection rates, contamination with extraembryonic DNA and concordance between results (cell-free DNA versus embryo samples) are centring proofs-of-concept and validation experiments. However, basic questions as the biological origin and representativeness of cell-free DNA are pending to be answered. Solved, unsolved and serious limitations of the new approaches are discussed. A final reflection respecting the state of the technique is offered.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932021000116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Reproductiva y Embriología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2340932021000116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

胚胎植入前基因检测作为避免单基因疾病和/或染色体异常传播的有效工具在世界范围内实施。这种方法需要注意胚胎的代表性样本,以便推断其遗传状态。目前,胚胎活检是胚胎取样的首选方法。活检程序是安全的,在临床常规中广泛执行。然而,这种干预是侵入性的,需要训练有素的人员和对特定设备的投资。近年来,在“非侵入性”的术语下提出了新的采样方法。这些方法是基于胚胎或其环境中存在无细胞DNA。越来越多的研究建议从胚胎或废培养基中收集液体以获得无细胞DNA,以评估着床前胚胎的遗传状况,避免胚胎活检。这个有吸引力的想法的可靠性需要得到确认和验证。从这个意义上说,这项工作提供了对迄今为止发表的数据的深入审查。已经测试了几种DNA检测、定量和扩增方法,并正在研究不同的方案和培养系统,是否有额外的胚胎操作。总的来说,发表的结果之间的巨大差异值得注意。DNA检出率、胚胎外DNA污染和结果(无细胞DNA与胚胎样本)之间的一致性等核心方面是概念验证和验证实验的中心。然而,游离DNA的生物学起源和代表性等基本问题仍有待解决。讨论了新方法已解决的、未解决的和严重的局限性。最后对该技术的现状进行了反思。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-invasive PGT

Preimplantation genetic testing is implemented worldwide as an effective tool to avoid transmission of single gene disorders and/or chromosome abnormalities. This approach requires the obtention of representative samples from embryos in order to infer its genetic status. Nowadays, the embryo biopsy is the first-choice method for embryo sampling. Biopsy procedures are safe and widely performed in the clinical routine. However, this intervention is invasive and requires trained personnel and investment in specific equipment. Recently, new sampling methods have been suggested under the term of “non-invasive”. These approaches are based on the existence of cell-free DNA into the embryo or its environment. An increasing number of studies suggest the collection of fluid from embryos or spent culture medium to obtain cell-free DNA to assess the genetic condition of preimplantation embryos avoiding embryo biopsy. The reliability of this attractive idea needs to be confirmed and validated. In this sense, this work offers a deep review of data published to date. Several methods of DNA detection, quantification and amplification have been tested and different protocols and culture systems, with or without additional embryo manipulations, are being investigated. In general terms, an enormous variability among published results is noteworthy. Central aspects as DNA detection rates, contamination with extraembryonic DNA and concordance between results (cell-free DNA versus embryo samples) are centring proofs-of-concept and validation experiments. However, basic questions as the biological origin and representativeness of cell-free DNA are pending to be answered. Solved, unsolved and serious limitations of the new approaches are discussed. A final reflection respecting the state of the technique is offered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信