{"title":"草地恢复增加了土壤生物群为植物提供的互惠利益","authors":"Hamrazsadat Soozandehfar, K. MacColl, H. Maherali","doi":"10.1086/724224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Premise of research. Many plant species engage in mutualistic symbioses with soil biota such as arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rhizobium bacteria. Agricultural practices such as chemical fertilizer application and tilling can decrease the mutualistic functions of soil biota, but whether restoration of agricultural lands causes soil biota to increase mutualistic functions is not frequently studied. Methodology. To evaluate whether ecological restoration of agricultural lands increases mutualistic benefits that soil biota provide to plants, we grew a mycorrhizal- and rhizobium-responsive host plant (Trifolium pratense) in a common background soil that had been inoculated with soil biota from grasslands that had been restored in the past 9–12 yr and adjacent cultivated fields. Because both AM fungi and rhizobium are nutritional symbionts, we grew plants in each soil biota treatment under both low- and high-fertilizer amendments to assess whether mutualistic services would be reduced when nutrient availability was high. Pivotal results. Inoculation with soil biota from restored grasslands increased aboveground plant biomass by ~19% compared with cultivated fields, and this positive effect was observed at both low and high fertilizer levels. In the low-fertilizer treatment, percentage colonization of roots by AM fungi was 1.8 times higher in treatments receiving restored grassland versus cultivated field inoculum, but there was no difference in AM fungal colonization under high-fertilizer treatments. Rhizobium nodulation of roots did not differ between restored grassland and cultivated field inoculum sources in either fertilizer treatment. Conclusions. These results show that the mutualistic benefits of soil biota can increase following the restoration of previously cultivated fields to grasslands. The positive effect of soil biota on plant biomass was most likely caused by AM fungi rather than rhizobium bacteria. Increases in mutualistic benefits provided by soil biota can occur within a decade following grassland restoration of formerly cultivated agricultural fields.","PeriodicalId":14306,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES","volume":"29 1","pages":"252 - 259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grassland Restoration Increases Mutualistic Benefits That Soil Biota Provide to Plants\",\"authors\":\"Hamrazsadat Soozandehfar, K. MacColl, H. Maherali\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/724224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Premise of research. Many plant species engage in mutualistic symbioses with soil biota such as arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rhizobium bacteria. Agricultural practices such as chemical fertilizer application and tilling can decrease the mutualistic functions of soil biota, but whether restoration of agricultural lands causes soil biota to increase mutualistic functions is not frequently studied. Methodology. To evaluate whether ecological restoration of agricultural lands increases mutualistic benefits that soil biota provide to plants, we grew a mycorrhizal- and rhizobium-responsive host plant (Trifolium pratense) in a common background soil that had been inoculated with soil biota from grasslands that had been restored in the past 9–12 yr and adjacent cultivated fields. Because both AM fungi and rhizobium are nutritional symbionts, we grew plants in each soil biota treatment under both low- and high-fertilizer amendments to assess whether mutualistic services would be reduced when nutrient availability was high. Pivotal results. Inoculation with soil biota from restored grasslands increased aboveground plant biomass by ~19% compared with cultivated fields, and this positive effect was observed at both low and high fertilizer levels. In the low-fertilizer treatment, percentage colonization of roots by AM fungi was 1.8 times higher in treatments receiving restored grassland versus cultivated field inoculum, but there was no difference in AM fungal colonization under high-fertilizer treatments. Rhizobium nodulation of roots did not differ between restored grassland and cultivated field inoculum sources in either fertilizer treatment. Conclusions. These results show that the mutualistic benefits of soil biota can increase following the restoration of previously cultivated fields to grasslands. The positive effect of soil biota on plant biomass was most likely caused by AM fungi rather than rhizobium bacteria. Increases in mutualistic benefits provided by soil biota can occur within a decade following grassland restoration of formerly cultivated agricultural fields.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"252 - 259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/724224\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Grassland Restoration Increases Mutualistic Benefits That Soil Biota Provide to Plants
Premise of research. Many plant species engage in mutualistic symbioses with soil biota such as arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and rhizobium bacteria. Agricultural practices such as chemical fertilizer application and tilling can decrease the mutualistic functions of soil biota, but whether restoration of agricultural lands causes soil biota to increase mutualistic functions is not frequently studied. Methodology. To evaluate whether ecological restoration of agricultural lands increases mutualistic benefits that soil biota provide to plants, we grew a mycorrhizal- and rhizobium-responsive host plant (Trifolium pratense) in a common background soil that had been inoculated with soil biota from grasslands that had been restored in the past 9–12 yr and adjacent cultivated fields. Because both AM fungi and rhizobium are nutritional symbionts, we grew plants in each soil biota treatment under both low- and high-fertilizer amendments to assess whether mutualistic services would be reduced when nutrient availability was high. Pivotal results. Inoculation with soil biota from restored grasslands increased aboveground plant biomass by ~19% compared with cultivated fields, and this positive effect was observed at both low and high fertilizer levels. In the low-fertilizer treatment, percentage colonization of roots by AM fungi was 1.8 times higher in treatments receiving restored grassland versus cultivated field inoculum, but there was no difference in AM fungal colonization under high-fertilizer treatments. Rhizobium nodulation of roots did not differ between restored grassland and cultivated field inoculum sources in either fertilizer treatment. Conclusions. These results show that the mutualistic benefits of soil biota can increase following the restoration of previously cultivated fields to grasslands. The positive effect of soil biota on plant biomass was most likely caused by AM fungi rather than rhizobium bacteria. Increases in mutualistic benefits provided by soil biota can occur within a decade following grassland restoration of formerly cultivated agricultural fields.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Plant Sciences has a distinguished history of publishing research in the plant sciences since 1875. IJPS presents high quality, original, peer-reviewed research from laboratories around the world in all areas of the plant sciences. Topics covered range from genetics and genomics, developmental and cell biology, biochemistry and physiology, to morphology and anatomy, systematics, evolution, paleobotany, plant-microbe interactions, and ecology. IJPS does NOT publish papers on agriculture or crop improvement. In addition to full-length research papers, IJPS publishes review articles, including the open access Coulter Reviews, rapid communications, and perspectives. IJPS welcomes contributions that present evaluations and new perspectives on areas of current interest in plant biology. IJPS publishes nine issues per year and regularly features special issues on topics of particular interest, including new and exciting research originally presented at major botanical conferences.