成人严重脓毒症及感染性休克的辅助治疗

T.H. Andersen , T.H. Jensen , L.W. Andersen
{"title":"成人严重脓毒症及感染性休克的辅助治疗","authors":"T.H. Andersen ,&nbsp;T.H. Jensen ,&nbsp;L.W. Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.cacc.2009.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sepsis continues to be a major unresolved medical challenge of the present. Despite earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation, source control, improvements in the standard of care and attempts at standardization of treatment and resuscitation protocols intensive care unit mortality rates for severe sepsis is 32.2% and 54.1% for septic shock. Further reduction in mortality may be achievable through knowledge and use of the expanding field of adjunctive therapy: a supplement to optimal, supportive, intensive therapy and antibiotic treatment.</p><p>Numerous and unsuccessful trials targeted at inhibiting various essential inflammatory mediators and receptors involved in the sepsis syndrome have failed to show a reduction in mortality, raising the question whether mortality in sepsis actually derives from an uncontrolled pro-inflammatory response. Thus, more broad based attempts at modulating the inflammatory response to infection like corticosteroids and drotrecogin alfa (activated) are to date the only drugs to have demonstrated mortality benefits in large randomized controlled trials. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of sepsis as a heterogeneous, dynamic syndrome caused by imbalances in the inflammatory network have provided newer hemofiltration techniques with a strong treatment rationale. Furthermore, endotoxin adsorption, if effective, has the potential to prevent further progression of the biological cascade of gram-negative sepsis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":81055,"journal":{"name":"Current anaesthesia and critical care","volume":"20 5","pages":"Pages 254-258"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cacc.2009.07.006","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjunctive therapy of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults\",\"authors\":\"T.H. Andersen ,&nbsp;T.H. Jensen ,&nbsp;L.W. Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cacc.2009.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sepsis continues to be a major unresolved medical challenge of the present. Despite earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation, source control, improvements in the standard of care and attempts at standardization of treatment and resuscitation protocols intensive care unit mortality rates for severe sepsis is 32.2% and 54.1% for septic shock. Further reduction in mortality may be achievable through knowledge and use of the expanding field of adjunctive therapy: a supplement to optimal, supportive, intensive therapy and antibiotic treatment.</p><p>Numerous and unsuccessful trials targeted at inhibiting various essential inflammatory mediators and receptors involved in the sepsis syndrome have failed to show a reduction in mortality, raising the question whether mortality in sepsis actually derives from an uncontrolled pro-inflammatory response. Thus, more broad based attempts at modulating the inflammatory response to infection like corticosteroids and drotrecogin alfa (activated) are to date the only drugs to have demonstrated mortality benefits in large randomized controlled trials. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of sepsis as a heterogeneous, dynamic syndrome caused by imbalances in the inflammatory network have provided newer hemofiltration techniques with a strong treatment rationale. Furthermore, endotoxin adsorption, if effective, has the potential to prevent further progression of the biological cascade of gram-negative sepsis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current anaesthesia and critical care\",\"volume\":\"20 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 254-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cacc.2009.07.006\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current anaesthesia and critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953711209000775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current anaesthesia and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953711209000775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

脓毒症仍然是目前尚未解决的主要医学挑战。尽管早期诊断和治疗开始、源头控制、护理标准的改进以及治疗和复苏方案标准化的尝试,重症监护室严重败血症的死亡率为32.2%,感染性休克的死亡率为54.1%。进一步降低死亡率可以通过知识和使用辅助治疗来实现,辅助治疗是对最佳、支持性、强化治疗和抗生素治疗的补充。许多不成功的试验旨在抑制脓毒症综合征中涉及的各种必需炎症介质和受体,但未能显示死亡率的降低,这引发了一个问题,即脓毒症的死亡率是否实际上源于不受控制的促炎反应。因此,迄今为止,在大型随机对照试验中,调节感染炎症反应的更广泛的尝试,如皮质类固醇和羟曲糖素(活化)是唯一被证明降低死亡率的药物。脓毒症是一种由炎症网络失衡引起的异质性动态综合征,对其病理生理学的理解取得了进展,这为更新的血液滤过技术提供了强有力的治疗依据。此外,内毒素吸附,如果有效,有可能防止进一步发展的革兰氏阴性败血症的生物级联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjunctive therapy of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults

Sepsis continues to be a major unresolved medical challenge of the present. Despite earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation, source control, improvements in the standard of care and attempts at standardization of treatment and resuscitation protocols intensive care unit mortality rates for severe sepsis is 32.2% and 54.1% for septic shock. Further reduction in mortality may be achievable through knowledge and use of the expanding field of adjunctive therapy: a supplement to optimal, supportive, intensive therapy and antibiotic treatment.

Numerous and unsuccessful trials targeted at inhibiting various essential inflammatory mediators and receptors involved in the sepsis syndrome have failed to show a reduction in mortality, raising the question whether mortality in sepsis actually derives from an uncontrolled pro-inflammatory response. Thus, more broad based attempts at modulating the inflammatory response to infection like corticosteroids and drotrecogin alfa (activated) are to date the only drugs to have demonstrated mortality benefits in large randomized controlled trials. Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of sepsis as a heterogeneous, dynamic syndrome caused by imbalances in the inflammatory network have provided newer hemofiltration techniques with a strong treatment rationale. Furthermore, endotoxin adsorption, if effective, has the potential to prevent further progression of the biological cascade of gram-negative sepsis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信