Shaymaa M. Nagi , Lamiaa M. Moharam , Ahmed Z. El Hoshy
{"title":"增强树脂改性玻璃离聚体在不同时间间隔下的氟化物释放与回灌","authors":"Shaymaa M. Nagi , Lamiaa M. Moharam , Ahmed Z. El Hoshy","doi":"10.1016/j.fdj.2018.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To investigate the fluoride release and recharge from two fluoride releasing materials at different time intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Sixty specimens were prepared then equally divided into 12 groups (n = 5/group), representing materials used; one resin modified glass ionomer restoration (RMGI); Fuji II LC and one enhanced RMGI; ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative. Each material was evaluated for its fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge using a topical fluoride recharging gel at 1, 2, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistical significant difference between different tested time intervals regarding fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge for both tested materials, where (p ≤ 0.001). The highest mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-1), and the least mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-28). There was no statistical significant difference between both materials at each time interval regarding fluoride release before recharge. While after fluoride recharge; RMGI (Fuji II LC) showed higher fluoride release mean values compared to the enhanced RMGI (ACTIVA) at each time interval (1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28 days).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RMGI and enhanced RMGI, showed the same pattern of fluoride release in deionized water, but RMGI was more successful to be recharged.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100562,"journal":{"name":"Future Dental Journal","volume":"4 2","pages":"Pages 221-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.06.005","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoride release and recharge of enhanced resin modified glass ionomer at different time intervals\",\"authors\":\"Shaymaa M. Nagi , Lamiaa M. Moharam , Ahmed Z. El Hoshy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fdj.2018.06.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To investigate the fluoride release and recharge from two fluoride releasing materials at different time intervals.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Sixty specimens were prepared then equally divided into 12 groups (n = 5/group), representing materials used; one resin modified glass ionomer restoration (RMGI); Fuji II LC and one enhanced RMGI; ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative. Each material was evaluated for its fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge using a topical fluoride recharging gel at 1, 2, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was a statistical significant difference between different tested time intervals regarding fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge for both tested materials, where (p ≤ 0.001). The highest mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-1), and the least mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-28). There was no statistical significant difference between both materials at each time interval regarding fluoride release before recharge. While after fluoride recharge; RMGI (Fuji II LC) showed higher fluoride release mean values compared to the enhanced RMGI (ACTIVA) at each time interval (1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28 days).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>RMGI and enhanced RMGI, showed the same pattern of fluoride release in deionized water, but RMGI was more successful to be recharged.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 221-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.fdj.2018.06.005\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314718018300454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2314718018300454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
摘要
目的研究两种氟释放材料在不同时间间隔下的氟释放和补给情况。材料和方法制备60个标本,平均分为12组(n = 5/组),代表使用的材料;一种树脂改性玻璃离子修复(RMGI);富士II LC和一个增强型RMGI;ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative。在第1、2、7、14、21和28天,使用局部补氟凝胶评估每种材料在补氟前后的氟化物释放情况。结果两种材料在充氟前后不同时间间隔的氟释放量差异有统计学意义(p≤0.001)。氟释放的平均值在第(1)天最高,第(28)天最低。在各时间间隔内,两种材料在充注前的氟化物释放量无统计学差异。而氟化物补给后;在每个时间间隔(1、2、7、14、21、28天),RMGI (Fuji II LC)的氟释放平均值均高于增强RMGI (ACTIVA)。结论RMGI与增强型RMGI在去离子水中释放氟的模式相同,但RMGI的再充电更成功。
Fluoride release and recharge of enhanced resin modified glass ionomer at different time intervals
Aim
To investigate the fluoride release and recharge from two fluoride releasing materials at different time intervals.
Materials and methods
Sixty specimens were prepared then equally divided into 12 groups (n = 5/group), representing materials used; one resin modified glass ionomer restoration (RMGI); Fuji II LC and one enhanced RMGI; ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative. Each material was evaluated for its fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge using a topical fluoride recharging gel at 1, 2, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days.
Results
There was a statistical significant difference between different tested time intervals regarding fluoride release before and after fluoride recharge for both tested materials, where (p ≤ 0.001). The highest mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-1), and the least mean value of fluoride release was in (Day-28). There was no statistical significant difference between both materials at each time interval regarding fluoride release before recharge. While after fluoride recharge; RMGI (Fuji II LC) showed higher fluoride release mean values compared to the enhanced RMGI (ACTIVA) at each time interval (1, 2, 7, 14, 21, 28 days).
Conclusion
RMGI and enhanced RMGI, showed the same pattern of fluoride release in deionized water, but RMGI was more successful to be recharged.