阿那克西曼德是如何成为物质一元论者的?

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY

Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2016-01-15 DOI:10.1515/rhiz-2016-0009

Nicolas Carraro

{"title":"阿那克西曼德是如何成为物质一元论者的?","authors":"Nicolas Carraro","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2016-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although the view that Anaximander was a Material Monist is not very popular nowadays, it is still widely held that it was embraced by Aristotle at least on some occasions, then adopted by Theophrastus, and later on inherited by Simplicius, our main source on the Presocratics. I argue that none of these three philosophers held this view and that, for this reason, it should not be seen as the standard ancient interpretation of Anaximander.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"154 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How did Anaximander Become a Material Monist?\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Carraro\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rhiz-2016-0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Although the view that Anaximander was a Material Monist is not very popular nowadays, it is still widely held that it was embraced by Aristotle at least on some occasions, then adopted by Theophrastus, and later on inherited by Simplicius, our main source on the Presocratics. I argue that none of these three philosophers held this view and that, for this reason, it should not be seen as the standard ancient interpretation of Anaximander.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"154 - 175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2016-0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2016-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

虽然阿那克西曼德是物质一元论的观点现在已经不太流行了，但人们仍然普遍认为，亚里士多德至少在某些情况下接受了这一观点，然后被泰奥弗拉斯托斯采纳，后来又被辛普利西乌斯继承了这一观点，辛普利西乌斯是我们研究前苏格拉底派的主要来源。我认为，这三位哲学家都不持有这种观点，因此，它不应被视为对阿那克西曼德的标准古代解释。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

How did Anaximander Become a Material Monist?

Abstract Although the view that Anaximander was a Material Monist is not very popular nowadays, it is still widely held that it was embraced by Aristotle at least on some occasions, then adopted by Theophrastus, and later on inherited by Simplicius, our main source on the Presocratics. I argue that none of these three philosophers held this view and that, for this reason, it should not be seen as the standard ancient interpretation of Anaximander.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量