研究了集体风险价值模型(CVaR)及其在寿险实际数据中的应用

IF 1.4 Q3 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Muhammad Iqbal Al-Banna Ismail, Abdul Talib bin Bon, S. Sukono, A. R. Effendie, J. Saputra
{"title":"研究了集体风险价值模型(CVaR)及其在寿险实际数据中的应用","authors":"Muhammad Iqbal Al-Banna Ismail, Abdul Talib bin Bon, S. Sukono, A. R. Effendie, J. Saputra","doi":"10.5267/j.dsl.2022.12.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Life insurance is designed to reduce the risk of financial loss due to unforeseen consequences related to the insured's death. In life insurance, the insurer provides death benefits as a claim when the insured suffers death. The claim is the compensation for a risk loss. Individual claim in one-period insurance is called aggregation claim, while aggregation claim is a collective risk. Collective risk is usually measured using a variance. However, the variance risk measure cannot often accommodate any event risk because there is a risk of claims beyond the amount of variance. Using the proposed method CVaR and confidence level are taken from α = 0.25% until 4%. This study found that the proposed method CVaR scored more fairly than Collective Risk. In conclusion, this study indicated that the collective risk model is just included using mean and variance without any confidence level. Therefore, only one result for the Collective Risk model, which automatically shows the model using mean, variance and standard deviation, could not accommodate all risk events.","PeriodicalId":38141,"journal":{"name":"Decision Science Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the collective value at risk model (CVaR) and its application on real data for life insurance\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Iqbal Al-Banna Ismail, Abdul Talib bin Bon, S. Sukono, A. R. Effendie, J. Saputra\",\"doi\":\"10.5267/j.dsl.2022.12.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Life insurance is designed to reduce the risk of financial loss due to unforeseen consequences related to the insured's death. In life insurance, the insurer provides death benefits as a claim when the insured suffers death. The claim is the compensation for a risk loss. Individual claim in one-period insurance is called aggregation claim, while aggregation claim is a collective risk. Collective risk is usually measured using a variance. However, the variance risk measure cannot often accommodate any event risk because there is a risk of claims beyond the amount of variance. Using the proposed method CVaR and confidence level are taken from α = 0.25% until 4%. This study found that the proposed method CVaR scored more fairly than Collective Risk. In conclusion, this study indicated that the collective risk model is just included using mean and variance without any confidence level. Therefore, only one result for the Collective Risk model, which automatically shows the model using mean, variance and standard deviation, could not accommodate all risk events.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Science Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Science Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2022.12.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Science Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2022.12.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人寿保险的目的是减少因与被保险人死亡有关的不可预见后果而造成经济损失的风险。在人寿保险中,当被保险人死亡时,保险人提供死亡抚恤金作为索赔。索赔是对风险损失的赔偿。一期保险中的个人索赔被称为汇总索赔,而汇总索赔是一种集体风险。集体风险通常用方差来衡量。然而,差异风险度量通常不能容纳任何事件风险,因为存在超出差异数量的索赔风险。采用该方法,CVaR和置信水平从α = 0.25%一直取到4%。本研究发现,CVaR方法的评分比集体风险方法更公平。综上所述,本研究表明,集体风险模型只是使用均值和方差纳入,没有任何置信水平。因此,对于使用均值、方差和标准差自动显示模型的集体风险模型,只有一个结果不能容纳所有风险事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the collective value at risk model (CVaR) and its application on real data for life insurance
Life insurance is designed to reduce the risk of financial loss due to unforeseen consequences related to the insured's death. In life insurance, the insurer provides death benefits as a claim when the insured suffers death. The claim is the compensation for a risk loss. Individual claim in one-period insurance is called aggregation claim, while aggregation claim is a collective risk. Collective risk is usually measured using a variance. However, the variance risk measure cannot often accommodate any event risk because there is a risk of claims beyond the amount of variance. Using the proposed method CVaR and confidence level are taken from α = 0.25% until 4%. This study found that the proposed method CVaR scored more fairly than Collective Risk. In conclusion, this study indicated that the collective risk model is just included using mean and variance without any confidence level. Therefore, only one result for the Collective Risk model, which automatically shows the model using mean, variance and standard deviation, could not accommodate all risk events.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Science Letters
Decision Science Letters Decision Sciences-Decision Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信