基于误差函数分析的单、二元和温度依赖吸附模型的比较

J. Fianu, Jebraeel Gholinezhad, M. Sayed
{"title":"基于误差函数分析的单、二元和温度依赖吸附模型的比较","authors":"J. Fianu, Jebraeel Gholinezhad, M. Sayed","doi":"10.30881/JOGPS.00027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The choice of adsorption model to use when accounting for gas adsorption in shale gas reservoirs is critical especially for Gas in Place (OGIP) calculations since inaccurate predictions can affect reporting of overall gas reserves. To that end, different adsorption models would have to be compared and evaluated in order to select the model that fits experimental data accurately. In examining the effect of using different error criteria for determining parameters for shale gas adsorption models, a statistically robust error analysis has been performed based on the sum of normalised error (SNE). Most shale gas adsorption modelling are conducted without finding out the most appropriate error function to use which introduces adsorption prediction errors in calculations. Five different error analysis were used including Sum of squared error (SSE), average relative error (ARE), the sum of absolute error (SAE), Marquardt’s Percent standard Deviation (MPSD), and Hybrid fractional error (HYBRID). To account for the influence of temperature in adsorption capacities, the study also compares the use of temperature dependent models, such as Exponential and Bi-Langmuir models for gas adsorption. These models can be conducted at multiple temperatures and ensure adsorption data can be obtained at any temperature beyond laboratory conditions. This is particularly useful when conducting thermal stimulation as an enhanced gas recovery in both coal/shale gas reservoirs. Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Sciences Submit your Article | www.ologypress.com/submit-article Ology Press Citation: Fianu J, Gholinezhad J, Hassan M. Comparison of Single, Binary and Temperature-Dependent Adsorption Models Based on Error Function Analysis. J Oil Gas Petrochem Sci. (2019);2(2):77-91. DOI: 10.30881/jogps.00027 78 function of pressure, but also of temperature. Section 2 of this study is, therefore, focused on describing the various single component systems, multi-component systems and finally temperature-dependent models used in the modelling of shale gas adsorption. Several works have been conducted on adsorption modelling without taking into consideration the choice of error function used in optimising the adsorption model.6,9,20–22 This often results in only one set of adsorption constants for the adsorption models being used without any serious interrogation to how accurately it fits the adsorption model to experimental data. According to Sreńscek-Nazzal et al.,23 very few detailed studies have been conducted on comparing the accuracy of the error functions used in modelling gas adsorption and also the accuracy of the predicted isotherm parameters. No study has however looked at comparing different error functions on modelling gas adsorption in shale gas reservoirs. In minimising the difference between the experimental data and the predicted results from the adsorption models, several error functions have been proposed and applied to predict optimal isotherms including sum of square error (SSE), average relative error (ARE), sum of absolute error (SAE), Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD) and Hybrid fractional error (HYBRID).23–26 Shale gas adsorption models Single Component Models Langmuir Isotherm One of the most widely used adsorption isotherms is Langmuir isotherm.6 A key assumption of Langmuir isotherm is that there must be a homogeneous surface and no interaction between the adjacent molecules. This is, however, a difficult concept to apply even in coal or shale systems, because their internal organic matter is chemically heterogeneous.6 Langmuir isotherm is given by the formulae below , 1 L V bp V bp = + Equation 1 Where V is the volume of adsorbed gas at pressure P , L V is the Langmuir volume or maximum gas adsorption at infinite pressure and b is the Langmuir constant. BET Model BET isotherm was developed in 1938 by Stephen Brunauer, P.H. Emmet and Edward Teller.27 A key assumption that was used in the derivation of this isotherm is the fact that the adsorption layers on the surface of the organic carbon were infinite. For relatively flat and non-porous surfaces, the use of Langmuir isotherm is often not valid. The BET isotherm is normally considered a better fit in describing the adsorption processes in certain shale gas reservoirs.11 The BET equation is given as","PeriodicalId":93120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oil, gas and petrochemical sciences","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Single, Binary and Temperature-Dependent Adsorption Models Based on Error Function Analysis\",\"authors\":\"J. Fianu, Jebraeel Gholinezhad, M. Sayed\",\"doi\":\"10.30881/JOGPS.00027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The choice of adsorption model to use when accounting for gas adsorption in shale gas reservoirs is critical especially for Gas in Place (OGIP) calculations since inaccurate predictions can affect reporting of overall gas reserves. To that end, different adsorption models would have to be compared and evaluated in order to select the model that fits experimental data accurately. In examining the effect of using different error criteria for determining parameters for shale gas adsorption models, a statistically robust error analysis has been performed based on the sum of normalised error (SNE). Most shale gas adsorption modelling are conducted without finding out the most appropriate error function to use which introduces adsorption prediction errors in calculations. Five different error analysis were used including Sum of squared error (SSE), average relative error (ARE), the sum of absolute error (SAE), Marquardt’s Percent standard Deviation (MPSD), and Hybrid fractional error (HYBRID). To account for the influence of temperature in adsorption capacities, the study also compares the use of temperature dependent models, such as Exponential and Bi-Langmuir models for gas adsorption. These models can be conducted at multiple temperatures and ensure adsorption data can be obtained at any temperature beyond laboratory conditions. This is particularly useful when conducting thermal stimulation as an enhanced gas recovery in both coal/shale gas reservoirs. Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Sciences Submit your Article | www.ologypress.com/submit-article Ology Press Citation: Fianu J, Gholinezhad J, Hassan M. Comparison of Single, Binary and Temperature-Dependent Adsorption Models Based on Error Function Analysis. J Oil Gas Petrochem Sci. (2019);2(2):77-91. DOI: 10.30881/jogps.00027 78 function of pressure, but also of temperature. Section 2 of this study is, therefore, focused on describing the various single component systems, multi-component systems and finally temperature-dependent models used in the modelling of shale gas adsorption. Several works have been conducted on adsorption modelling without taking into consideration the choice of error function used in optimising the adsorption model.6,9,20–22 This often results in only one set of adsorption constants for the adsorption models being used without any serious interrogation to how accurately it fits the adsorption model to experimental data. According to Sreńscek-Nazzal et al.,23 very few detailed studies have been conducted on comparing the accuracy of the error functions used in modelling gas adsorption and also the accuracy of the predicted isotherm parameters. No study has however looked at comparing different error functions on modelling gas adsorption in shale gas reservoirs. In minimising the difference between the experimental data and the predicted results from the adsorption models, several error functions have been proposed and applied to predict optimal isotherms including sum of square error (SSE), average relative error (ARE), sum of absolute error (SAE), Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD) and Hybrid fractional error (HYBRID).23–26 Shale gas adsorption models Single Component Models Langmuir Isotherm One of the most widely used adsorption isotherms is Langmuir isotherm.6 A key assumption of Langmuir isotherm is that there must be a homogeneous surface and no interaction between the adjacent molecules. This is, however, a difficult concept to apply even in coal or shale systems, because their internal organic matter is chemically heterogeneous.6 Langmuir isotherm is given by the formulae below , 1 L V bp V bp = + Equation 1 Where V is the volume of adsorbed gas at pressure P , L V is the Langmuir volume or maximum gas adsorption at infinite pressure and b is the Langmuir constant. BET Model BET isotherm was developed in 1938 by Stephen Brunauer, P.H. Emmet and Edward Teller.27 A key assumption that was used in the derivation of this isotherm is the fact that the adsorption layers on the surface of the organic carbon were infinite. For relatively flat and non-porous surfaces, the use of Langmuir isotherm is often not valid. The BET isotherm is normally considered a better fit in describing the adsorption processes in certain shale gas reservoirs.11 The BET equation is given as\",\"PeriodicalId\":93120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oil, gas and petrochemical sciences\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oil, gas and petrochemical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30881/JOGPS.00027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oil, gas and petrochemical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30881/JOGPS.00027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

当考虑页岩气藏中的气体吸附时,使用的吸附模型的选择至关重要,特别是对于就地天然气(OGIP)的计算,因为不准确的预测会影响总体天然气储量的报告。为此,必须对不同的吸附模型进行比较和评估,以便选择准确符合实验数据的模型。在研究使用不同误差标准确定页岩气吸附模型参数的影响时,基于归一化误差(SNE)的总和进行了统计上稳健的误差分析。大多数页岩气的吸附建模都没有找到最合适的误差函数,这在计算中引入了吸附预测误差。采用了五种不同的误差分析方法,包括误差平方和(SSE)、平均相对误差(ARE)、绝对误差和(SAE)、马夸特百分比标准差(MPSD)和混合分数误差(Hybrid)。为了考虑温度对吸附能力的影响,该研究还比较了温度依赖模型的使用,例如气体吸附的指数模型和Bi-Langmuir模型。这些模型可以在多个温度下进行,并确保在超出实验室条件的任何温度下都可以获得吸附数据。当在煤/页岩气藏中进行热增产以提高天然气采收率时,这一点尤其有用。引用本文:Fianu J, Gholinezhad J, Hassan M.基于误差函数分析的单、二元和温度依赖吸附模型比较。[J]石油天然气与石油化学。(2019); 2(2): 77 - 91。DOI: 10.30881 / jogps。有压力功能,也有温度功能。因此,本研究的第2节将重点描述用于页岩气吸附建模的各种单组分系统、多组分系统以及最后的温度依赖模型。在没有考虑优化吸附模型时使用的误差函数的选择的情况下,已经进行了一些吸附建模工作。6,9,20 - 22这通常导致使用的吸附模型只有一组吸附常数,而没有对吸附模型与实验数据的拟合程度进行认真的质疑。根据Sreńscek-Nazzal等人的说法,23很少有详细的研究比较用于模拟气体吸附的误差函数的准确性以及预测等温线参数的准确性。然而,目前还没有研究对页岩气藏气体吸附模型的不同误差函数进行比较。为了使实验数据与吸附模型预测结果之间的差异最小化,提出了几种误差函数,并将其应用于预测最佳等温线,包括平方和误差(SSE)、平均相对误差(ARE)、绝对误差和(SAE)、马夸特百分比标准偏差(MPSD)和混合分数误差(Hybrid)。页岩气吸附模型Langmuir等温线Langmuir等温线是应用最广泛的吸附等温线之一朗缪尔等温线的一个关键假设是,必须有一个均匀的表面,相邻分子之间没有相互作用。然而,即使在煤或页岩系统中,这也是一个难以应用的概念,因为它们内部的有机物质在化学上是不均匀的Langmuir等温线由下式给出:1 L V bp V bp = +式1其中V为P压力下吸附气体的体积,lv为无限压力下的Langmuir体积或最大气体吸附量,b为Langmuir常数。BET等温线模型是由Stephen Brunauer, P.H. Emmet和Edward teller于1938年提出的。27在推导该等温线时使用的一个关键假设是有机碳表面的吸附层是无限的。对于相对平坦和无孔的表面,使用朗缪尔等温线通常是无效的。通常认为BET等温线更适合描述某些页岩气储层的吸附过程BET方程为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Single, Binary and Temperature-Dependent Adsorption Models Based on Error Function Analysis
The choice of adsorption model to use when accounting for gas adsorption in shale gas reservoirs is critical especially for Gas in Place (OGIP) calculations since inaccurate predictions can affect reporting of overall gas reserves. To that end, different adsorption models would have to be compared and evaluated in order to select the model that fits experimental data accurately. In examining the effect of using different error criteria for determining parameters for shale gas adsorption models, a statistically robust error analysis has been performed based on the sum of normalised error (SNE). Most shale gas adsorption modelling are conducted without finding out the most appropriate error function to use which introduces adsorption prediction errors in calculations. Five different error analysis were used including Sum of squared error (SSE), average relative error (ARE), the sum of absolute error (SAE), Marquardt’s Percent standard Deviation (MPSD), and Hybrid fractional error (HYBRID). To account for the influence of temperature in adsorption capacities, the study also compares the use of temperature dependent models, such as Exponential and Bi-Langmuir models for gas adsorption. These models can be conducted at multiple temperatures and ensure adsorption data can be obtained at any temperature beyond laboratory conditions. This is particularly useful when conducting thermal stimulation as an enhanced gas recovery in both coal/shale gas reservoirs. Journal of Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Sciences Submit your Article | www.ologypress.com/submit-article Ology Press Citation: Fianu J, Gholinezhad J, Hassan M. Comparison of Single, Binary and Temperature-Dependent Adsorption Models Based on Error Function Analysis. J Oil Gas Petrochem Sci. (2019);2(2):77-91. DOI: 10.30881/jogps.00027 78 function of pressure, but also of temperature. Section 2 of this study is, therefore, focused on describing the various single component systems, multi-component systems and finally temperature-dependent models used in the modelling of shale gas adsorption. Several works have been conducted on adsorption modelling without taking into consideration the choice of error function used in optimising the adsorption model.6,9,20–22 This often results in only one set of adsorption constants for the adsorption models being used without any serious interrogation to how accurately it fits the adsorption model to experimental data. According to Sreńscek-Nazzal et al.,23 very few detailed studies have been conducted on comparing the accuracy of the error functions used in modelling gas adsorption and also the accuracy of the predicted isotherm parameters. No study has however looked at comparing different error functions on modelling gas adsorption in shale gas reservoirs. In minimising the difference between the experimental data and the predicted results from the adsorption models, several error functions have been proposed and applied to predict optimal isotherms including sum of square error (SSE), average relative error (ARE), sum of absolute error (SAE), Marquardt’s percent standard deviation (MPSD) and Hybrid fractional error (HYBRID).23–26 Shale gas adsorption models Single Component Models Langmuir Isotherm One of the most widely used adsorption isotherms is Langmuir isotherm.6 A key assumption of Langmuir isotherm is that there must be a homogeneous surface and no interaction between the adjacent molecules. This is, however, a difficult concept to apply even in coal or shale systems, because their internal organic matter is chemically heterogeneous.6 Langmuir isotherm is given by the formulae below , 1 L V bp V bp = + Equation 1 Where V is the volume of adsorbed gas at pressure P , L V is the Langmuir volume or maximum gas adsorption at infinite pressure and b is the Langmuir constant. BET Model BET isotherm was developed in 1938 by Stephen Brunauer, P.H. Emmet and Edward Teller.27 A key assumption that was used in the derivation of this isotherm is the fact that the adsorption layers on the surface of the organic carbon were infinite. For relatively flat and non-porous surfaces, the use of Langmuir isotherm is often not valid. The BET isotherm is normally considered a better fit in describing the adsorption processes in certain shale gas reservoirs.11 The BET equation is given as
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信