广场市长与审美自由主义:塞维利亚公共空间的另类模式

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Pedro Mena Vega
{"title":"广场市长与审美自由主义:塞维利亚公共空间的另类模式","authors":"Pedro Mena Vega","doi":"10.1080/13602365.2022.2141295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concave urban space, a morphological innovation that dominated the European Modern Age, has an extensive historiography and numerous identifiable types: the Spanish plaza mayor, the French place royale, or the English squares. However, not enough attention has been paid to the examples of cities that did not succeed in implementing these plans, or to the alternative models that emerged from the oppositions they encountered on the ground. This is why the case of Seville and its Plaza de San Francisco, in apparent conflict with a general history of public space, is presented here — it shows, distinct from the plaza mayor, specifically the emergence of a city project based on the initiative of the private owners, with the connivance of the urban planning authorities. By consulting primary sources, a historical development of these processes is established as well as their consequences for the contemporary city.","PeriodicalId":44236,"journal":{"name":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plaza mayor vs aesthetic liberalism: alternative models of public space in Seville\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Mena Vega\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13602365.2022.2141295\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The concave urban space, a morphological innovation that dominated the European Modern Age, has an extensive historiography and numerous identifiable types: the Spanish plaza mayor, the French place royale, or the English squares. However, not enough attention has been paid to the examples of cities that did not succeed in implementing these plans, or to the alternative models that emerged from the oppositions they encountered on the ground. This is why the case of Seville and its Plaza de San Francisco, in apparent conflict with a general history of public space, is presented here — it shows, distinct from the plaza mayor, specifically the emergence of a city project based on the initiative of the private owners, with the connivance of the urban planning authorities. By consulting primary sources, a historical development of these processes is established as well as their consequences for the contemporary city.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2022.2141295\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2022.2141295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

凹形城市空间是主导欧洲近代的一种形态创新,有着广泛的历史记载和许多可识别的类型:西班牙的马约尔广场、法国的皇家广场或英国的广场。然而,没有对未能成功执行这些计划的城市的例子给予足够的注意,也没有对它们在实地遇到的反对意见中产生的替代模式给予足够的注意。这就是为什么塞维利亚及其旧金山广场的案例,与公共空间的一般历史明显冲突,在这里呈现-它表明,与广场市长不同,特别是在城市规划当局的默许下,一个基于私人业主倡议的城市项目的出现。通过参考原始资料,建立了这些过程的历史发展以及它们对当代城市的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plaza mayor vs aesthetic liberalism: alternative models of public space in Seville
The concave urban space, a morphological innovation that dominated the European Modern Age, has an extensive historiography and numerous identifiable types: the Spanish plaza mayor, the French place royale, or the English squares. However, not enough attention has been paid to the examples of cities that did not succeed in implementing these plans, or to the alternative models that emerged from the oppositions they encountered on the ground. This is why the case of Seville and its Plaza de San Francisco, in apparent conflict with a general history of public space, is presented here — it shows, distinct from the plaza mayor, specifically the emergence of a city project based on the initiative of the private owners, with the connivance of the urban planning authorities. By consulting primary sources, a historical development of these processes is established as well as their consequences for the contemporary city.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE is a biannual refereed publication of the Middle East Technical University published every June and December, and offers a comprehensive range of articles contributing to the development of knowledge in man-environment relations, design and planning. METU JFA accepts submissions in English or Turkish, and assumes that the manuscripts received by the Journal have not been published previously or that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. METU JFA invites theory, research and history papers on the following fields and related interdisciplinary topics: architecture and urbanism, planning and design, restoration and preservation, buildings and building systems technologies and design, product design and technologies. Prospective manuscripts for publication in these fields may constitute; 1. Original theoretical papers; 2. Original research papers; 3. Documents and critical expositions; 4. Applied studies related to professional practice; 5. Educational works, commentaries and reviews; 6. Book reviews Manuscripts, in English or Turkish, have to be approved by the Editorial Board, which are then forwarded to Referees before acceptance for publication. The Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. It is assumed that the manuscripts received by the Journal are not sent to other journals for publication purposes and have not been previously published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信