《新墨西哥和阿尔塔:美国西南部的殖民时期》

IF 1.8 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Ethnoarchaeology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/19442890.2020.1723220

K. Dongoske

{"title":"《新墨西哥和阿尔塔:美国西南部的殖民时期》","authors":"K. Dongoske","doi":"10.1080/19442890.2020.1723220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dietler, M., and I. Herbich. 1989. “TichMatek: The Technology of Luo Pottery Production and the Definition of Ceramic Style.” World Archaeology 21 (1): 148–164. Dobres, M.A., and J. E. Robb. 2000. Agency in Archaeology. New York: Routledge. Knappett, C., and L. Malafouris. 2008.Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lemonnier, P. 1992. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. Olsen, B. 2003. “Material Culture After Text: Re-membering Things.” Norwegian Archeological Review 36 (2): 87–104. Robb, J. 2010. “Beyond Agency.” World Archaeology 42 (4): 493–520.","PeriodicalId":42668,"journal":{"name":"Ethnoarchaeology","volume":"32 1","pages":"66 - 68"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Mexico and the Pimeria Alta: The Colonial Period in the American Southwest\",\"authors\":\"K. Dongoske\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19442890.2020.1723220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dietler, M., and I. Herbich. 1989. “TichMatek: The Technology of Luo Pottery Production and the Definition of Ceramic Style.” World Archaeology 21 (1): 148–164. Dobres, M.A., and J. E. Robb. 2000. Agency in Archaeology. New York: Routledge. Knappett, C., and L. Malafouris. 2008.Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lemonnier, P. 1992. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. Olsen, B. 2003. “Material Culture After Text: Re-membering Things.” Norwegian Archeological Review 36 (2): 87–104. Robb, J. 2010. “Beyond Agency.” World Archaeology 42 (4): 493–520.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnoarchaeology\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"66 - 68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnoarchaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2020.1723220\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnoarchaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19442890.2020.1723220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

布迪厄，P. 1977。《实践论大纲》剑桥:剑桥大学出版社。迪特勒，M.和I.赫比希1989。“TichMatek:洛陶生产技术与陶瓷风格的定义”世界考古21(1):148-164。Dobres, m.a.和j.e. Robb. 2000。考古机构。纽约:劳特利奇出版社。Knappett, C.和L. Malafouris. 2008。物质中介:走向非人类中心主义。纽约:施普林格科学与商业传媒。拉图尔，B. 2005。重组社会:行动者网络理论导论。牛津:牛津大学出版社。莱蒙尼尔，P. 1992。技术人类学的要素。安娜堡:密歇根大学人类学博物馆。奥尔森，2003。“文本之后的物质文化:记忆事物”挪威考古评论36(2):87-104。罗柏，J. 2010。“超越。”世界考古42(4):493-520。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

New Mexico and the Pimeria Alta: The Colonial Period in the American Southwest

Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dietler, M., and I. Herbich. 1989. “TichMatek: The Technology of Luo Pottery Production and the Definition of Ceramic Style.” World Archaeology 21 (1): 148–164. Dobres, M.A., and J. E. Robb. 2000. Agency in Archaeology. New York: Routledge. Knappett, C., and L. Malafouris. 2008.Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lemonnier, P. 1992. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. Olsen, B. 2003. “Material Culture After Text: Re-membering Things.” Norwegian Archeological Review 36 (2): 87–104. Robb, J. 2010. “Beyond Agency.” World Archaeology 42 (4): 493–520.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ethnoarchaeology ARCHAEOLOGY-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Ethnoarchaeology, a cross-cultural peer-reviewed journal, focuses on the present position, impact of, and future prospects of ethnoarchaeological and experimental studies approaches to anthropological research. The primary goal of this journal is to provide practitioners with an intellectual platform to showcase and appraise current research and theoretical and methodological directions for the 21st century. Although there has been an exponential increase in ethnoarchaeological and experimental research in the past thirty years, there is little that unifies or defines our subdiscipline. Ethnoarchaeology addresses this need, exploring what distinguishes ethnoarchaeological and experimental approaches, what methods connect practitioners, and what unique suite of research attributes we contribute to the better understanding of the human condition. In addition to research articles, the journal publishes book and other media reviews, periodic theme issues, and position statements by noted scholars.