玛丽·伍德·艾普斯,循道主义的方法,生物动力的灵魂

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
A. Schwartz
{"title":"玛丽·伍德·艾普斯,循道主义的方法,生物动力的灵魂","authors":"A. Schwartz","doi":"10.1353/jnc.2022.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay reads a critically neglected conversion narrative by a nineteenth century Pequot woman to argue that biopower has materialist specificity. Mary Apess's name for her experience of that specificity was \"the soul.\" And biopower was effective because that ensouled experience was one of deep loneliness. This argument begins with the modest but undertheorized proposition that for native converts, the returns on Christian conversion were not often clear or prompt. This essay examines conversion's risks as one native woman tallied them, risks shaped by her experience of gender and Indigeneity. It contrasts those risks with conversion's gains, specifically, conversion to Methodism. Methodism interested Apess—and should interest us—not simply for its affordance of fraternity among the socially and politically disesteemed, but because it was one of the earliest examples of biopolitical discipline, the \"Wesleyan pedagogy\" that Foucault named in his History of Sexuality. Methodism's method answered Apess's loneliness, her risky desire \"to see and be seen.\" As a way to negotiate the vagaries of what recent Indigenous studies has called liberalism's \"politics of recognition,\" Apess's critique of white ensoulment recalibrates the horizon of biopolitical criticism in the present—not so much an opportunity to conceptualize ecstasy as an invitation to imagine alienation's relief.","PeriodicalId":41876,"journal":{"name":"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists","volume":"28 1","pages":"241 - 265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mary Wood Apess, Methodism's Method, and Biopower's Soul\",\"authors\":\"A. Schwartz\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jnc.2022.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay reads a critically neglected conversion narrative by a nineteenth century Pequot woman to argue that biopower has materialist specificity. Mary Apess's name for her experience of that specificity was \\\"the soul.\\\" And biopower was effective because that ensouled experience was one of deep loneliness. This argument begins with the modest but undertheorized proposition that for native converts, the returns on Christian conversion were not often clear or prompt. This essay examines conversion's risks as one native woman tallied them, risks shaped by her experience of gender and Indigeneity. It contrasts those risks with conversion's gains, specifically, conversion to Methodism. Methodism interested Apess—and should interest us—not simply for its affordance of fraternity among the socially and politically disesteemed, but because it was one of the earliest examples of biopolitical discipline, the \\\"Wesleyan pedagogy\\\" that Foucault named in his History of Sexuality. Methodism's method answered Apess's loneliness, her risky desire \\\"to see and be seen.\\\" As a way to negotiate the vagaries of what recent Indigenous studies has called liberalism's \\\"politics of recognition,\\\" Apess's critique of white ensoulment recalibrates the horizon of biopolitical criticism in the present—not so much an opportunity to conceptualize ecstasy as an invitation to imagine alienation's relief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"241 - 265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jnc.2022.0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jnc.2022.0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文阅读了一位19世纪佩科特女性的一篇被严重忽视的转变叙事,认为生物权力具有唯物主义的特殊性。Mary Apess用“灵魂”来形容她这种特殊的经历。生物力量是有效的,因为这种赋予灵魂的体验是一种深深的孤独。这个论点开始于一个谦虚但不太理论化的命题,即对于本地的皈依者来说,皈依基督教的回报往往不明确或不及时。这篇文章考察了一位土著妇女所总结的皈依的风险,这些风险是由她的性别和土著经历塑造的。它将这些风险与皈依的收益,特别是皈依卫理公会的收益进行了对比。卫理公会对apess感兴趣——也应该对我们感兴趣——不仅仅是因为它在社会和政治上不受尊重的人之间提供了友爱,还因为它是生命政治学科的最早例子之一,福柯在他的《性史》中称之为“卫斯理教学法”。卫理公会的方法回答了艾普斯的孤独,她冒险的愿望“看见和被看见”。作为一种与最近的土著研究所称的自由主义的“承认政治”的变幻莫测进行协商的方式,Apess对白人狂喜的批评重新校准了当下生物政治批评的视野——与其说是将狂喜概念化的机会,不如说是邀请人们想象异化的解脱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mary Wood Apess, Methodism's Method, and Biopower's Soul
Abstract:This essay reads a critically neglected conversion narrative by a nineteenth century Pequot woman to argue that biopower has materialist specificity. Mary Apess's name for her experience of that specificity was "the soul." And biopower was effective because that ensouled experience was one of deep loneliness. This argument begins with the modest but undertheorized proposition that for native converts, the returns on Christian conversion were not often clear or prompt. This essay examines conversion's risks as one native woman tallied them, risks shaped by her experience of gender and Indigeneity. It contrasts those risks with conversion's gains, specifically, conversion to Methodism. Methodism interested Apess—and should interest us—not simply for its affordance of fraternity among the socially and politically disesteemed, but because it was one of the earliest examples of biopolitical discipline, the "Wesleyan pedagogy" that Foucault named in his History of Sexuality. Methodism's method answered Apess's loneliness, her risky desire "to see and be seen." As a way to negotiate the vagaries of what recent Indigenous studies has called liberalism's "politics of recognition," Apess's critique of white ensoulment recalibrates the horizon of biopolitical criticism in the present—not so much an opportunity to conceptualize ecstasy as an invitation to imagine alienation's relief.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信