关于模型细化的需求验证

C. Ghezzi, C. Menghi, Amir Molzam Sharifloo, P. Spoletini
{"title":"关于模型细化的需求验证","authors":"C. Ghezzi, C. Menghi, Amir Molzam Sharifloo, P. Spoletini","doi":"10.1109/RE.2013.6636706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional formal verification techniques rely on the assumption that a system's specification is completely available so that the analysis can say whether or not a set of properties will be satisfied. On the contrary, modern development lifecycles call for agileincremental and iterativeapproaches to tame the boosting complexity of modern software systems and reduce development risks. We focus here on requirements verification performed in the early exploratory stages on high-level models and we discuss how this can be integrated into an agile approach. We present a new technique to model-check incomplete high-level specifications against formally specified requirements. We do this in the context of incomplete hierarchical Statecharts, verified against a variation of CTL properties. Our approach supports step-wise specification and refinement verification. Verification can be incremental, that is alternative refinements may be separately explored and verification is only replayed for the modified parts. The results are presented by introducing the formalisms, the model-checking algorithm, and the tool we have implemented.","PeriodicalId":6342,"journal":{"name":"2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"12 1","pages":"62-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On requirements verification for model refinements\",\"authors\":\"C. Ghezzi, C. Menghi, Amir Molzam Sharifloo, P. Spoletini\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE.2013.6636706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional formal verification techniques rely on the assumption that a system's specification is completely available so that the analysis can say whether or not a set of properties will be satisfied. On the contrary, modern development lifecycles call for agileincremental and iterativeapproaches to tame the boosting complexity of modern software systems and reduce development risks. We focus here on requirements verification performed in the early exploratory stages on high-level models and we discuss how this can be integrated into an agile approach. We present a new technique to model-check incomplete high-level specifications against formally specified requirements. We do this in the context of incomplete hierarchical Statecharts, verified against a variation of CTL properties. Our approach supports step-wise specification and refinement verification. Verification can be incremental, that is alternative refinements may be separately explored and verification is only replayed for the modified parts. The results are presented by introducing the formalisms, the model-checking algorithm, and the tool we have implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"62-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2013.6636706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 21st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2013.6636706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

传统的形式化验证技术依赖于一个假设,即系统的规范是完全可用的,这样分析就可以判断一组属性是否满足。相反,现代开发生命周期需要敏捷增量和迭代的方法来驯服现代软件系统不断增加的复杂性,并降低开发风险。我们在这里关注在高级模型的早期探索阶段执行的需求验证,并讨论如何将其集成到敏捷方法中。我们提出了一种新的技术,根据正式指定的需求对不完整的高级规格进行模型检查。我们在不完整的分层Statecharts上下文中这样做,根据CTL属性的变化进行验证。我们的方法支持逐步规范和细化验证。验证可以是增量的,也就是说,可以单独探索可选的改进,并且只对修改的部分进行验证。通过介绍形式化、模型检查算法和我们实现的工具,给出了结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On requirements verification for model refinements
Conventional formal verification techniques rely on the assumption that a system's specification is completely available so that the analysis can say whether or not a set of properties will be satisfied. On the contrary, modern development lifecycles call for agileincremental and iterativeapproaches to tame the boosting complexity of modern software systems and reduce development risks. We focus here on requirements verification performed in the early exploratory stages on high-level models and we discuss how this can be integrated into an agile approach. We present a new technique to model-check incomplete high-level specifications against formally specified requirements. We do this in the context of incomplete hierarchical Statecharts, verified against a variation of CTL properties. Our approach supports step-wise specification and refinement verification. Verification can be incremental, that is alternative refinements may be separately explored and verification is only replayed for the modified parts. The results are presented by introducing the formalisms, the model-checking algorithm, and the tool we have implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信