问卷构建与心理测量评价作为员工选拔筛选的注意力与意志力测试

Iqbal Maesa Febriawan, Achmad Afrizal Fauzan, Chelsea Adelina, Hana Naufalinda Afifah, Razaf Pari, Aswin Januarsjaf
{"title":"问卷构建与心理测量评价作为员工选拔筛选的注意力与意志力测试","authors":"Iqbal Maesa Febriawan, Achmad Afrizal Fauzan, Chelsea Adelina, Hana Naufalinda Afifah, Razaf Pari, Aswin Januarsjaf","doi":"10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.22352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attention and willpower are some of the primary modalities for work, so it is necessary to evaluate those potentials. However, standard tests for assessing the two aspects, such as the Pauli or Kraepelin test, are bias-prone to numerical ability. Due to that concern, Qutest was designed as an attention and willpower (screening) test with symbolic stimulus adapted from the d2 test (Brickencamp, 1998). Two studies were conducted for Qutest psychometric properties evaluation. In the first study, 261 participants finished Qutest on a web-based platform with a maximum of 96 pages, each containing 24 symbols of key stimuli (a symbol Q with two dots) and distractors that had to complete in a maximum of 30 minutes. Analyses of internal consistency and correlation with Pauli test results were performed to establish test psychometric properties. The results supported adequate internal consistency and convergent validity claim for Qutest. In addition to internal consistency, a second study was conducted to develop further and evaluate parallel-form consistency between mobile and computer versions. In the second study, 371 participants completed a maximum of 192-page Qutest with a similar amount of time to the previous study. Participants took the mobile version first and then the computer versions of the test with a minimum of one lag day. Statistically significant correlation index of results across devices supported parallel-form reliability of both mobile and laptop/desktop Qutest version. A follow-up analysis of answering aids (mouse, trackpad, touch screen) for the computer version recommended using a mouse or touch screen instead of a trackpad due to statistically significant difference in performance among the three tools. Thus, Qutest can be used as a psychometrically adequate test and be flexible in various devices to assess attention and willpower for (prospective) employee screening.","PeriodicalId":34093,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qutest Construction and Psychometric Evaluation as Test of Attention and Willpower for Employee Selection Screening\",\"authors\":\"Iqbal Maesa Febriawan, Achmad Afrizal Fauzan, Chelsea Adelina, Hana Naufalinda Afifah, Razaf Pari, Aswin Januarsjaf\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.22352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Attention and willpower are some of the primary modalities for work, so it is necessary to evaluate those potentials. However, standard tests for assessing the two aspects, such as the Pauli or Kraepelin test, are bias-prone to numerical ability. Due to that concern, Qutest was designed as an attention and willpower (screening) test with symbolic stimulus adapted from the d2 test (Brickencamp, 1998). Two studies were conducted for Qutest psychometric properties evaluation. In the first study, 261 participants finished Qutest on a web-based platform with a maximum of 96 pages, each containing 24 symbols of key stimuli (a symbol Q with two dots) and distractors that had to complete in a maximum of 30 minutes. Analyses of internal consistency and correlation with Pauli test results were performed to establish test psychometric properties. The results supported adequate internal consistency and convergent validity claim for Qutest. In addition to internal consistency, a second study was conducted to develop further and evaluate parallel-form consistency between mobile and computer versions. In the second study, 371 participants completed a maximum of 192-page Qutest with a similar amount of time to the previous study. Participants took the mobile version first and then the computer versions of the test with a minimum of one lag day. Statistically significant correlation index of results across devices supported parallel-form reliability of both mobile and laptop/desktop Qutest version. A follow-up analysis of answering aids (mouse, trackpad, touch screen) for the computer version recommended using a mouse or touch screen instead of a trackpad due to statistically significant difference in performance among the three tools. Thus, Qutest can be used as a psychometrically adequate test and be flexible in various devices to assess attention and willpower for (prospective) employee screening.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.22352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v11i1.22352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

注意力和意志力是工作的一些基本模式,因此有必要评估这些潜力。然而,用于评估这两个方面的标准测试,如泡利测试或Kraepelin测试,容易对数字能力产生偏见。出于这种考虑,Qutest被设计为一种注意力和意志力(筛选)测试,采用了d2测试的符号刺激(Brickencamp, 1998)。对Qutest心理测量特性进行了两项研究。在第一项研究中,261名参与者在一个网络平台上完成Qutest,该平台最多有96页,每页包含24个关键刺激符号(一个带有两个点的符号Q)和干扰物,必须在最多30分钟内完成。通过内部一致性分析和与泡利测验结果的相关性分析来确定测验的心理测量性质。结果支持Qutest具有足够的内部一致性和收敛效度声明。除了内部一致性外,还进行了第二项研究,以进一步开发和评估移动版本和计算机版本之间平行形式的一致性。在第二项研究中,371名参与者用与前一项研究相似的时间完成了最长192页的问卷测试。参与者先参加手机版本的测试,然后再参加电脑版本的测试,至少有一天的延迟。在支持移动和笔记本/桌面Qutest版本的并行形式可靠性的设备上,结果的统计显著相关指数。对电脑版本的回答辅助工具(鼠标、触控板、触摸屏)的后续分析建议使用鼠标或触摸屏而不是触控板,因为这三种工具的性能在统计学上有显著差异。因此,Qutest可以作为心理测量学上足够的测试,并且可以灵活地在各种设备中评估(未来)员工筛选的注意力和意志力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Qutest Construction and Psychometric Evaluation as Test of Attention and Willpower for Employee Selection Screening
Attention and willpower are some of the primary modalities for work, so it is necessary to evaluate those potentials. However, standard tests for assessing the two aspects, such as the Pauli or Kraepelin test, are bias-prone to numerical ability. Due to that concern, Qutest was designed as an attention and willpower (screening) test with symbolic stimulus adapted from the d2 test (Brickencamp, 1998). Two studies were conducted for Qutest psychometric properties evaluation. In the first study, 261 participants finished Qutest on a web-based platform with a maximum of 96 pages, each containing 24 symbols of key stimuli (a symbol Q with two dots) and distractors that had to complete in a maximum of 30 minutes. Analyses of internal consistency and correlation with Pauli test results were performed to establish test psychometric properties. The results supported adequate internal consistency and convergent validity claim for Qutest. In addition to internal consistency, a second study was conducted to develop further and evaluate parallel-form consistency between mobile and computer versions. In the second study, 371 participants completed a maximum of 192-page Qutest with a similar amount of time to the previous study. Participants took the mobile version first and then the computer versions of the test with a minimum of one lag day. Statistically significant correlation index of results across devices supported parallel-form reliability of both mobile and laptop/desktop Qutest version. A follow-up analysis of answering aids (mouse, trackpad, touch screen) for the computer version recommended using a mouse or touch screen instead of a trackpad due to statistically significant difference in performance among the three tools. Thus, Qutest can be used as a psychometrically adequate test and be flexible in various devices to assess attention and willpower for (prospective) employee screening.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信