安大略省私立和公立大学之间的第三方安排:利益、威胁、政策影响

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
L. Schollen
{"title":"安大略省私立和公立大学之间的第三方安排:利益、威胁、政策影响","authors":"L. Schollen","doi":"10.1080/13636820.2023.2246326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Ontario’s Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology (CAATs) were established as an alternative public postsecondary choice for students to provide vocational education programmes to serve Ontario’s labour market. In the past 20 years years, neoliberal policies have pressured CAATs to be more entrepreneurial, efficient, and fiscally sustainable. Declining funding and enrolment and burgeoning demand from international students led some colleges to enter third-party arrangements (TPAs) with for-profit private career colleges (PCCs). This research used a qualitative research design to examine the development, growth and impact of TPAs between 2005 and 2019. Two overarching theoretical frameworks grounded the research: historical institutionalism (Streeck & Thelen, 2005) and Principal-Agent Theory (Mitnick, 1973; Ross, 1975). Document analysis and 25 semi-structured interviews were used to elucidate the trajectory of the formation, growth and cementing of TPAs into the Ontario college system. Inflection points were conceptualised to explain how decisions and conditions contributed to the trajectory. Competition, marketisation of higher education, economics, demographics and policies were seen as contributing to the formation, growth and formalisation of the TPAs. TPAs were perceived to introduce strategic risks to public colleges concerning future funding and enablement of PCCs, which have implications for system design, including further privatisation of Ontario’s public college system.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Third-party arrangements between private and public colleges in Ontario: benefits, threats, implications for policy\",\"authors\":\"L. Schollen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13636820.2023.2246326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Ontario’s Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology (CAATs) were established as an alternative public postsecondary choice for students to provide vocational education programmes to serve Ontario’s labour market. In the past 20 years years, neoliberal policies have pressured CAATs to be more entrepreneurial, efficient, and fiscally sustainable. Declining funding and enrolment and burgeoning demand from international students led some colleges to enter third-party arrangements (TPAs) with for-profit private career colleges (PCCs). This research used a qualitative research design to examine the development, growth and impact of TPAs between 2005 and 2019. Two overarching theoretical frameworks grounded the research: historical institutionalism (Streeck & Thelen, 2005) and Principal-Agent Theory (Mitnick, 1973; Ross, 1975). Document analysis and 25 semi-structured interviews were used to elucidate the trajectory of the formation, growth and cementing of TPAs into the Ontario college system. Inflection points were conceptualised to explain how decisions and conditions contributed to the trajectory. Competition, marketisation of higher education, economics, demographics and policies were seen as contributing to the formation, growth and formalisation of the TPAs. TPAs were perceived to introduce strategic risks to public colleges concerning future funding and enablement of PCCs, which have implications for system design, including further privatisation of Ontario’s public college system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2023.2246326\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2023.2246326","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安大略省的应用艺术与技术学院(CAATs)是为学生提供职业教育课程以服务安大略省劳动力市场的另一种公共高等教育选择。在过去的20年里,新自由主义政策迫使caat更具创业精神、效率和财政可持续性。资金和入学人数的减少以及国际学生需求的不断增长,导致一些大学与营利性私立职业学院(pcc)签订了第三方协议(tpa)。本研究采用定性研究设计,考察了2005年至2019年tpa的发展、增长和影响。两个主要的理论框架为研究奠定了基础:历史制度主义(Streeck & Thelen, 2005)和委托-代理理论(Mitnick, 1973;罗斯,1975)。本文采用文献分析和25个半结构化访谈来阐明tpa在安大略省学院系统中的形成、发展和巩固的轨迹。拐点被概念化,用来解释决策和条件对轨迹的影响。竞争、高等教育市场化、经济、人口和政策被视为促进贸易促进协定形成、增长和正规化的因素。tpa被认为给公立大学带来了战略风险,涉及到未来的资金和PCCs的实施,这对系统设计有影响,包括安大略省公立大学系统的进一步私有化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Third-party arrangements between private and public colleges in Ontario: benefits, threats, implications for policy
ABSTRACT Ontario’s Colleges of Applied Arts and Technology (CAATs) were established as an alternative public postsecondary choice for students to provide vocational education programmes to serve Ontario’s labour market. In the past 20 years years, neoliberal policies have pressured CAATs to be more entrepreneurial, efficient, and fiscally sustainable. Declining funding and enrolment and burgeoning demand from international students led some colleges to enter third-party arrangements (TPAs) with for-profit private career colleges (PCCs). This research used a qualitative research design to examine the development, growth and impact of TPAs between 2005 and 2019. Two overarching theoretical frameworks grounded the research: historical institutionalism (Streeck & Thelen, 2005) and Principal-Agent Theory (Mitnick, 1973; Ross, 1975). Document analysis and 25 semi-structured interviews were used to elucidate the trajectory of the formation, growth and cementing of TPAs into the Ontario college system. Inflection points were conceptualised to explain how decisions and conditions contributed to the trajectory. Competition, marketisation of higher education, economics, demographics and policies were seen as contributing to the formation, growth and formalisation of the TPAs. TPAs were perceived to introduce strategic risks to public colleges concerning future funding and enablement of PCCs, which have implications for system design, including further privatisation of Ontario’s public college system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信