航运业的资产重估和公司回报率

IF 0.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ECONOMICS
G. Wright
{"title":"航运业的资产重估和公司回报率","authors":"G. Wright","doi":"10.1400/16890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shipping entities have in the past, on average, reported poor financial performance and yet have continued to retain and attract capital. This paper explores this apparent contradiction by investigating how alternative approaches to the question of asset revaluation affect financial performance calculations. Asset revaluation has traditionally been seen as reducing the value of assets in company accounts to reflect depreciation. However, economic theory suggests asset values are determined by expected future earnings, with fluctuations in expectations leading to increases or decreases in asset prices. In such circumstances, the use of the traditional accounting approach to calculate company rates of return will lead to errors. To illustrate this finding, data on the 120,000 dwt dry bulk carrier market is used to calculate company financial performance, defined as the 1 year rate of return, for a hypothetical single vessel shipping company on both the traditional accounting basis and the economic basis. The 2 approaches produce results that are both quantitatively different and uncorrelated, indicating that past use of the traditional method has resulted in an inaccurate, distorted picture of the financial performance of the shipping industry.","PeriodicalId":44910,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Transport Economics","volume":"241 1","pages":"1000-1008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2003-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asset revaluation and company rates of return in the shipping industry\",\"authors\":\"G. Wright\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/16890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shipping entities have in the past, on average, reported poor financial performance and yet have continued to retain and attract capital. This paper explores this apparent contradiction by investigating how alternative approaches to the question of asset revaluation affect financial performance calculations. Asset revaluation has traditionally been seen as reducing the value of assets in company accounts to reflect depreciation. However, economic theory suggests asset values are determined by expected future earnings, with fluctuations in expectations leading to increases or decreases in asset prices. In such circumstances, the use of the traditional accounting approach to calculate company rates of return will lead to errors. To illustrate this finding, data on the 120,000 dwt dry bulk carrier market is used to calculate company financial performance, defined as the 1 year rate of return, for a hypothetical single vessel shipping company on both the traditional accounting basis and the economic basis. The 2 approaches produce results that are both quantitatively different and uncorrelated, indicating that past use of the traditional method has resulted in an inaccurate, distorted picture of the financial performance of the shipping industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"volume\":\"241 1\",\"pages\":\"1000-1008\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Transport Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/16890\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Transport Economics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/16890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

航运实体过去的平均财务表现不佳,但仍继续保留和吸引资本。本文通过研究资产重估问题的替代方法如何影响财务绩效计算,探讨了这一明显的矛盾。传统上,资产重估被视为减少公司账户中资产的价值,以反映折旧。然而,经济理论表明,资产价值是由预期的未来收益决定的,预期的波动会导致资产价格的上涨或下跌。在这种情况下,使用传统的会计方法来计算公司收益率将导致错误。为了说明这一发现,使用120,000载重吨干散货船市场的数据来计算公司财务绩效,并将其定义为假设的单船航运公司在传统会计基础和经济基础上的1年收益率。这两种方法产生的结果在数量上不同且不相关,表明过去使用传统方法导致了航运业财务业绩的不准确和扭曲的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asset revaluation and company rates of return in the shipping industry
Shipping entities have in the past, on average, reported poor financial performance and yet have continued to retain and attract capital. This paper explores this apparent contradiction by investigating how alternative approaches to the question of asset revaluation affect financial performance calculations. Asset revaluation has traditionally been seen as reducing the value of assets in company accounts to reflect depreciation. However, economic theory suggests asset values are determined by expected future earnings, with fluctuations in expectations leading to increases or decreases in asset prices. In such circumstances, the use of the traditional accounting approach to calculate company rates of return will lead to errors. To illustrate this finding, data on the 120,000 dwt dry bulk carrier market is used to calculate company financial performance, defined as the 1 year rate of return, for a hypothetical single vessel shipping company on both the traditional accounting basis and the economic basis. The 2 approaches produce results that are both quantitatively different and uncorrelated, indicating that past use of the traditional method has resulted in an inaccurate, distorted picture of the financial performance of the shipping industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信