致幻剂辅助心理治疗的治疗联盟:研究和干预的新目标

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2023-12-13 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1089/psymed.2023.0020
Philip Kamilar-Britt, Elana B Gordis, Mitch Earleywine
{"title":"致幻剂辅助心理治疗的治疗联盟:研究和干预的新目标","authors":"Philip Kamilar-Britt, Elana B Gordis, Mitch Earleywine","doi":"10.1089/psymed.2023.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical trials support the promise of psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) and reveal potential mechanisms underlying efficacy. Out of necessity, initial studies of PAT have focused on feasibility and impact with special attention to acute responses to the molecules, but investigations of the psychotherapy components of PAT have lagged other work. Years of research on other forms of psychotherapy reveal that one of the most important contributors to outcome is the therapeutic alliance, a cooperative connection between clients and providers. The alliance has accounted for meaningful variance in psychotherapies independent of their theoretical orientation, number of sessions, and rates of change in improvement. Nevertheless, recent critiques suggest that previous estimates of the alliance's impact were exaggerated because of statistical problems. This controversy only underscores the idea that the alliance could prove a valuable target for understanding mechanisms and enhancing PAT's impact. Initial work shows promise, but only two publications address the issue directly despite decades of emphasis on the alliance in published recommendations for conducting PAT. Adding alliance measures to clinical trials would not require extensive effort or resources. Each practitioner could improve alliance relatively easily, regardless of theoretical orientation, through increases in uncontroversial clinician behaviors that focus on respect for client autonomy, listening skills, and current practical concerns. This article details support for the alliance construct, reviews relevant measurement strategies, and underscores implications for researchers and clinicians. Increased attention to the therapeutic alliance could enhance our understanding of mechanisms underlying PAT and improve outcomes, potentially decreasing human suffering more efficiently.</p>","PeriodicalId":74590,"journal":{"name":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"258 1","pages":"262-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Therapeutic Alliance in Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy: A Novel Target for Research and Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Kamilar-Britt, Elana B Gordis, Mitch Earleywine\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/psymed.2023.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clinical trials support the promise of psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) and reveal potential mechanisms underlying efficacy. Out of necessity, initial studies of PAT have focused on feasibility and impact with special attention to acute responses to the molecules, but investigations of the psychotherapy components of PAT have lagged other work. Years of research on other forms of psychotherapy reveal that one of the most important contributors to outcome is the therapeutic alliance, a cooperative connection between clients and providers. The alliance has accounted for meaningful variance in psychotherapies independent of their theoretical orientation, number of sessions, and rates of change in improvement. Nevertheless, recent critiques suggest that previous estimates of the alliance's impact were exaggerated because of statistical problems. This controversy only underscores the idea that the alliance could prove a valuable target for understanding mechanisms and enhancing PAT's impact. Initial work shows promise, but only two publications address the issue directly despite decades of emphasis on the alliance in published recommendations for conducting PAT. Adding alliance measures to clinical trials would not require extensive effort or resources. Each practitioner could improve alliance relatively easily, regardless of theoretical orientation, through increases in uncontroversial clinician behaviors that focus on respect for client autonomy, listening skills, and current practical concerns. This article details support for the alliance construct, reviews relevant measurement strategies, and underscores implications for researchers and clinicians. Increased attention to the therapeutic alliance could enhance our understanding of mechanisms underlying PAT and improve outcomes, potentially decreasing human suffering more efficiently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"258 1\",\"pages\":\"262-266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658648/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2023.0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2023.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Therapeutic Alliance in Psychedelic-Assisted Psychotherapy: A Novel Target for Research and Interventions.

Clinical trials support the promise of psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) and reveal potential mechanisms underlying efficacy. Out of necessity, initial studies of PAT have focused on feasibility and impact with special attention to acute responses to the molecules, but investigations of the psychotherapy components of PAT have lagged other work. Years of research on other forms of psychotherapy reveal that one of the most important contributors to outcome is the therapeutic alliance, a cooperative connection between clients and providers. The alliance has accounted for meaningful variance in psychotherapies independent of their theoretical orientation, number of sessions, and rates of change in improvement. Nevertheless, recent critiques suggest that previous estimates of the alliance's impact were exaggerated because of statistical problems. This controversy only underscores the idea that the alliance could prove a valuable target for understanding mechanisms and enhancing PAT's impact. Initial work shows promise, but only two publications address the issue directly despite decades of emphasis on the alliance in published recommendations for conducting PAT. Adding alliance measures to clinical trials would not require extensive effort or resources. Each practitioner could improve alliance relatively easily, regardless of theoretical orientation, through increases in uncontroversial clinician behaviors that focus on respect for client autonomy, listening skills, and current practical concerns. This article details support for the alliance construct, reviews relevant measurement strategies, and underscores implications for researchers and clinicians. Increased attention to the therapeutic alliance could enhance our understanding of mechanisms underlying PAT and improve outcomes, potentially decreasing human suffering more efficiently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信