对现有可公开验证的秘密共享方案的关键调查

Kun Peng
{"title":"对现有可公开验证的秘密共享方案的关键调查","authors":"Kun Peng","doi":"10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The existing publicly verifiable secret sharing (PVSS) schemes are surveyed in a critical way in this study. The authors show that they are not so reliable and efficient as they claim or appear. They are limited by assumptions and conditions, vulnerable in important target properties and need more cost in practice. In this study, their actual performance and cost are fairly measured and their drawbacks are pointed out.","PeriodicalId":13305,"journal":{"name":"IET Inf. Secur.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical survey of existing publicly verifiable secret sharing schemes\",\"authors\":\"Kun Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The existing publicly verifiable secret sharing (PVSS) schemes are surveyed in a critical way in this study. The authors show that they are not so reliable and efficient as they claim or appear. They are limited by assumptions and conditions, vulnerable in important target properties and need more cost in practice. In this study, their actual performance and cost are fairly measured and their drawbacks are pointed out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文对现有的可公开验证的秘密共享(PVSS)方案进行了综述。作者表明,他们并不像他们声称或表现的那样可靠和高效。它们受到假设和条件的限制,在重要的目标属性上容易受到攻击,并且在实际应用中需要更多的成本。在本研究中,公平地衡量了它们的实际性能和成本,并指出了它们的缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical survey of existing publicly verifiable secret sharing schemes
The existing publicly verifiable secret sharing (PVSS) schemes are surveyed in a critical way in this study. The authors show that they are not so reliable and efficient as they claim or appear. They are limited by assumptions and conditions, vulnerable in important target properties and need more cost in practice. In this study, their actual performance and cost are fairly measured and their drawbacks are pointed out.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信