{"title":"对一个严重精神失常的女人进行经济有效的精神分析治疗。","authors":"R. Abramson","doi":"10.1521/JAAP.29.2.245.17259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Guidelines for the treatment of psychotic conditions currently emphasize psychopharmacology and supportive individual and family counseling as well as environmental approaches (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1997). In the past three decades psychoanalytic therapeutic approaches to the treatment of these conditions have bccn regarded as ineffective, except in rare cases (Davis and Andriukaitis, 1986; Hogarty et al., 1986; Kane, 1987). The thrust of these guidelines is reflected by criteria that managed care organizations (MCOs) use to approve or disallow treatment services (Merit Behavioral Care, 1997). These criteria prescribe the use of medication combined with a psychotherapeutic approach that emphasizes brief treatment directed toward behaviorally measurable goals (United Behavioral Health, 1999). The uncovering of emotional life and the reconstruction of past experiences having emotional consequences in the present, characteristic of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic therapy, are regarded as irrelevant in some cases and, in other cases, as disorganizing and therefore counter-therapeutic. Differences of opinion as to the relevance of psychoanalysis in the treatment of schizophrenia and related conditions goes back over 100 years. Freud (1911) did not attempt to treat primitive psychoses with psychoanalysis, and current biopsychiatry sees itself in the tradition of Kraeplin (1907), whose methods were descriptive and biological. Bleuler (1911), however, did apply psychoanalytic principles and a more intrapsychic approach to the understanding and treatment of patients with schizophrenia and other major mental disorders. In the first 65 years of the twentieth century, until the advent of effectivc psychopharmacology and cognitive and behavioral psychotherapies, psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic treatment were the only systematic treatments of mental disorders that had some effectiveness; therefore, these approaches continued to be used in the treatment of major mental illnesses. Such approaches remained controversial, but those who engaged in them reported strongly beneficial outcomes (Fromm-Reichman, 1948; Giovac","PeriodicalId":76662,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis","volume":"101 1","pages":"245-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cost-effective psychoanalytic treatment of a severely disturbed woman.\",\"authors\":\"R. Abramson\",\"doi\":\"10.1521/JAAP.29.2.245.17259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Guidelines for the treatment of psychotic conditions currently emphasize psychopharmacology and supportive individual and family counseling as well as environmental approaches (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1997). In the past three decades psychoanalytic therapeutic approaches to the treatment of these conditions have bccn regarded as ineffective, except in rare cases (Davis and Andriukaitis, 1986; Hogarty et al., 1986; Kane, 1987). The thrust of these guidelines is reflected by criteria that managed care organizations (MCOs) use to approve or disallow treatment services (Merit Behavioral Care, 1997). These criteria prescribe the use of medication combined with a psychotherapeutic approach that emphasizes brief treatment directed toward behaviorally measurable goals (United Behavioral Health, 1999). The uncovering of emotional life and the reconstruction of past experiences having emotional consequences in the present, characteristic of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic therapy, are regarded as irrelevant in some cases and, in other cases, as disorganizing and therefore counter-therapeutic. Differences of opinion as to the relevance of psychoanalysis in the treatment of schizophrenia and related conditions goes back over 100 years. Freud (1911) did not attempt to treat primitive psychoses with psychoanalysis, and current biopsychiatry sees itself in the tradition of Kraeplin (1907), whose methods were descriptive and biological. Bleuler (1911), however, did apply psychoanalytic principles and a more intrapsychic approach to the understanding and treatment of patients with schizophrenia and other major mental disorders. In the first 65 years of the twentieth century, until the advent of effectivc psychopharmacology and cognitive and behavioral psychotherapies, psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic treatment were the only systematic treatments of mental disorders that had some effectiveness; therefore, these approaches continued to be used in the treatment of major mental illnesses. Such approaches remained controversial, but those who engaged in them reported strongly beneficial outcomes (Fromm-Reichman, 1948; Giovac\",\"PeriodicalId\":76662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"245-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1521/JAAP.29.2.245.17259\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/JAAP.29.2.245.17259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
目前精神疾病的治疗指南强调精神药理学、支持性个人和家庭咨询以及环境方法(美国精神病学协会[APA], 1997)。在过去的三十年中,除了在极少数情况下,治疗这些疾病的精神分析治疗方法被认为是无效的(Davis和Andriukaitis, 1986;Hogarty et al., 1986;凯恩,1987)。这些指导方针的主旨反映在管理式护理组织(MCOs)用来批准或禁止治疗服务的标准上(Merit Behavioral care, 1997)。这些标准规定使用药物和心理治疗相结合的方法,强调针对行为可测量目标的简短治疗(联合行为健康,1999年)。情感生活的揭示和对过去经历的重建会对现在产生情感影响,这是精神分析和精神分析治疗的特征,在某些情况下被认为是无关紧要的,在其他情况下,被认为是混乱的,因此是反治疗的。关于精神分析在治疗精神分裂症和相关疾病中的相关性的意见分歧可以追溯到100多年前。弗洛伊德(1911)并没有试图用精神分析来治疗原始精神病,而当前的生物精神病学认为自己是在Kraeplin(1907)的传统中,他的方法是描述性的和生物学的。然而,Bleuler(1911)确实运用了精神分析原理和一种更内在的方法来理解和治疗精神分裂症和其他主要精神障碍患者。在20世纪的前65年,直到有效的精神药理学以及认知和行为心理疗法出现之前,精神分析和精神分析治疗是唯一对精神障碍有一定效果的系统治疗;因此,这些方法继续用于治疗重大精神疾病。这些方法仍然存在争议,但那些参与其中的人报告了非常有益的结果(Fromm-Reichman, 1948;Giovac
A cost-effective psychoanalytic treatment of a severely disturbed woman.
Guidelines for the treatment of psychotic conditions currently emphasize psychopharmacology and supportive individual and family counseling as well as environmental approaches (American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1997). In the past three decades psychoanalytic therapeutic approaches to the treatment of these conditions have bccn regarded as ineffective, except in rare cases (Davis and Andriukaitis, 1986; Hogarty et al., 1986; Kane, 1987). The thrust of these guidelines is reflected by criteria that managed care organizations (MCOs) use to approve or disallow treatment services (Merit Behavioral Care, 1997). These criteria prescribe the use of medication combined with a psychotherapeutic approach that emphasizes brief treatment directed toward behaviorally measurable goals (United Behavioral Health, 1999). The uncovering of emotional life and the reconstruction of past experiences having emotional consequences in the present, characteristic of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic therapy, are regarded as irrelevant in some cases and, in other cases, as disorganizing and therefore counter-therapeutic. Differences of opinion as to the relevance of psychoanalysis in the treatment of schizophrenia and related conditions goes back over 100 years. Freud (1911) did not attempt to treat primitive psychoses with psychoanalysis, and current biopsychiatry sees itself in the tradition of Kraeplin (1907), whose methods were descriptive and biological. Bleuler (1911), however, did apply psychoanalytic principles and a more intrapsychic approach to the understanding and treatment of patients with schizophrenia and other major mental disorders. In the first 65 years of the twentieth century, until the advent of effectivc psychopharmacology and cognitive and behavioral psychotherapies, psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic treatment were the only systematic treatments of mental disorders that had some effectiveness; therefore, these approaches continued to be used in the treatment of major mental illnesses. Such approaches remained controversial, but those who engaged in them reported strongly beneficial outcomes (Fromm-Reichman, 1948; Giovac