甜菜的生长和品质及其与播种方式、氮肥和硼肥的关系

M. Gomaa, M. Nassar, S. M, Gawhara A. El-Sorady, A. Suleiman
{"title":"甜菜的生长和品质及其与播种方式、氮肥和硼肥的关系","authors":"M. Gomaa, M. Nassar, S. M, Gawhara A. El-Sorady, A. Suleiman","doi":"10.21608/eajbsh.2022.255546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two field experiments were carried out at Itay El-Baroud Experimental station in El-Beheira Governorate, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt in the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 winter seasons to study the effect of four different systems to display the ridge in the planting of sugar beet (ridge width 110 cm (Rw1), ridge width 100 cm (Rw2), ridge width 90 cm (Rw3) and ridge width 80 cm (Rw4), four nitrogen fertilizer levels (75 kg N /fed (N1), 90 kg N /fed (N2), 105 kg N /fed (N3) and 120 kg N /fed (N1) and three systems of boron foliar spray (zero boron (B0), foliar spray once of boron at 95 days from sowing (B1) and Foliar spray twice of boron at 95 and 125 day from sowing (B2) on growth, yield and quality characters of sugar beet. Results showed that planting sugar beet on a wider ridge of 110 cm recorded the highest chlorophyll content and crop growth rate while planting sugar beet on a narrow ridge of 80cm resulted in the highest leaf area index. Grown sugar beet on a narrow ridge of 90cm resulted in the highest root yield, sugar yield /fed and quality in both seasons. Increasing nitrogen fertilizer levels from 75 to 90, 105 and 120 kg N /fed significantly decreased root yield, sugar yield/fed and quality in both seasons. Whereas increasing foliar spray of boron from zero to one and twice foliar spraying increased root yield, sugar yield/fed and quality. It could be concluded from these results that planting sugar beet on ridge narrow of 90 cm, 75 kg N/fed and twice foliar spraying of boron are the suitable recommendation to maximize sugar beet productivity and quality. beet ridge width ridge width ridge width systems of boron foliar of Foliar boron 95 days from sowing Foliar twice days beet","PeriodicalId":34635,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences H Botany","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Growth and Quality of Sugar Beet and Its Relationship to Sowing Method, Nitrogen and Boron Fertilization\",\"authors\":\"M. Gomaa, M. Nassar, S. M, Gawhara A. El-Sorady, A. Suleiman\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/eajbsh.2022.255546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two field experiments were carried out at Itay El-Baroud Experimental station in El-Beheira Governorate, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt in the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 winter seasons to study the effect of four different systems to display the ridge in the planting of sugar beet (ridge width 110 cm (Rw1), ridge width 100 cm (Rw2), ridge width 90 cm (Rw3) and ridge width 80 cm (Rw4), four nitrogen fertilizer levels (75 kg N /fed (N1), 90 kg N /fed (N2), 105 kg N /fed (N3) and 120 kg N /fed (N1) and three systems of boron foliar spray (zero boron (B0), foliar spray once of boron at 95 days from sowing (B1) and Foliar spray twice of boron at 95 and 125 day from sowing (B2) on growth, yield and quality characters of sugar beet. Results showed that planting sugar beet on a wider ridge of 110 cm recorded the highest chlorophyll content and crop growth rate while planting sugar beet on a narrow ridge of 80cm resulted in the highest leaf area index. Grown sugar beet on a narrow ridge of 90cm resulted in the highest root yield, sugar yield /fed and quality in both seasons. Increasing nitrogen fertilizer levels from 75 to 90, 105 and 120 kg N /fed significantly decreased root yield, sugar yield/fed and quality in both seasons. Whereas increasing foliar spray of boron from zero to one and twice foliar spraying increased root yield, sugar yield/fed and quality. It could be concluded from these results that planting sugar beet on ridge narrow of 90 cm, 75 kg N/fed and twice foliar spraying of boron are the suitable recommendation to maximize sugar beet productivity and quality. beet ridge width ridge width ridge width systems of boron foliar of Foliar boron 95 days from sowing Foliar twice days beet\",\"PeriodicalId\":34635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences H Botany\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences H Botany\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsh.2022.255546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences H Botany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eajbsh.2022.255546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019/2020和2020/2021冬季,在埃及农业研究中心El-Beheira省Itay El-Baroud试验站进行了2项田间试验,研究了4种不同垄沟系统(垄沟宽度110 cm (Rw1)、垄沟宽度100 cm (Rw2)、垄沟宽度90 cm (Rw3)和垄沟宽度80 cm (Rw4)、4种氮肥水平(75 kg N /饲料(N1)、90 kg N /饲料(N2)、105 kg N /料(N3)和120 kg N /料(N1)和3种喷硼体系(零硼(B0)、播后95 d喷硼1次(B1)、播后95 d和125 d喷硼2次(B2))对甜菜生长、产量和品质性状的影响。结果表明,在110 cm较宽的垄上种植甜菜,叶绿素含量和作物生长率最高;在80cm较窄的垄上种植甜菜,叶面积指数最高。在90cm的窄垄上种植甜菜,两季根产量、食糖产量和品质均最高。氮肥用量从75 ~ 90、105和120 kg / d显著降低了两季的根产量、糖产量和品质。叶面喷硼量由零喷硼量增加到一次喷硼量和两次喷硼量均提高了根产量、糖料产量和品质。综上所述,为实现甜菜产量和品质的最大化,建议在垄窄90 cm、氮/料75 kg、叶面喷硼2次的条件下种植甜菜。甜菜垄宽垄宽,叶面硼宽垄宽,叶面硼距播叶面硼95天两次甜菜
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Growth and Quality of Sugar Beet and Its Relationship to Sowing Method, Nitrogen and Boron Fertilization
Two field experiments were carried out at Itay El-Baroud Experimental station in El-Beheira Governorate, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt in the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 winter seasons to study the effect of four different systems to display the ridge in the planting of sugar beet (ridge width 110 cm (Rw1), ridge width 100 cm (Rw2), ridge width 90 cm (Rw3) and ridge width 80 cm (Rw4), four nitrogen fertilizer levels (75 kg N /fed (N1), 90 kg N /fed (N2), 105 kg N /fed (N3) and 120 kg N /fed (N1) and three systems of boron foliar spray (zero boron (B0), foliar spray once of boron at 95 days from sowing (B1) and Foliar spray twice of boron at 95 and 125 day from sowing (B2) on growth, yield and quality characters of sugar beet. Results showed that planting sugar beet on a wider ridge of 110 cm recorded the highest chlorophyll content and crop growth rate while planting sugar beet on a narrow ridge of 80cm resulted in the highest leaf area index. Grown sugar beet on a narrow ridge of 90cm resulted in the highest root yield, sugar yield /fed and quality in both seasons. Increasing nitrogen fertilizer levels from 75 to 90, 105 and 120 kg N /fed significantly decreased root yield, sugar yield/fed and quality in both seasons. Whereas increasing foliar spray of boron from zero to one and twice foliar spraying increased root yield, sugar yield/fed and quality. It could be concluded from these results that planting sugar beet on ridge narrow of 90 cm, 75 kg N/fed and twice foliar spraying of boron are the suitable recommendation to maximize sugar beet productivity and quality. beet ridge width ridge width ridge width systems of boron foliar of Foliar boron 95 days from sowing Foliar twice days beet
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信