另一条前进之路:评奥尔森对实证会计研究的批判

Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4431151
Matthias Breuer
{"title":"另一条前进之路:评奥尔森对实证会计研究的批判","authors":"Matthias Breuer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4431151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ohlson (2023. Empirical accounting seminars: Elephants in the room. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium) laments that the evidentiary quality of empirical accounting research is low due to inappropriate methods and practices, leaving seminar attendees and readers unpersuaded by presented or published articles. He suggests that the norms of the profession prevent a public recognition and discussion of those issues, thereby sustaining the poor state of empirical accounting research. I agree that some current empirical approaches and norms seem to hamper progress toward more convincing research. I provide a practical suggestion to possibly improve the state of empirical accounting research. I caution though that even with better methods and more honest research practices, we should not expect that any individual research article can provide conclusive answers to important accounting questions. Such progress in knowledge requires a body of high-quality and independent research.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Another Way Forward: Comments on Ohlson’s Critique of Empirical Accounting Research\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Breuer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.4431151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Ohlson (2023. Empirical accounting seminars: Elephants in the room. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium) laments that the evidentiary quality of empirical accounting research is low due to inappropriate methods and practices, leaving seminar attendees and readers unpersuaded by presented or published articles. He suggests that the norms of the profession prevent a public recognition and discussion of those issues, thereby sustaining the poor state of empirical accounting research. I agree that some current empirical approaches and norms seem to hamper progress toward more convincing research. I provide a practical suggestion to possibly improve the state of empirical accounting research. I caution though that even with better methods and more honest research practices, we should not expect that any individual research article can provide conclusive answers to important accounting questions. Such progress in knowledge requires a body of high-quality and independent research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4431151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4431151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要奥尔森(2023)。实证会计研讨会:房间里的大象。《会计、经济与法律:一种共识》感叹,实证会计研究的证据质量低,是由于不恰当的方法和实践,使研讨会的与会者和读者无法被提交或发表的文章所说服。他认为,会计行业的规范阻碍了公众对这些问题的认识和讨论,从而维持了实证会计研究的糟糕状态。我同意,目前的一些实证方法和规范似乎阻碍了更有说服力的研究的进展。本文提出了一个可行的建议,以改善实证会计研究的现状。我要提醒的是,即使有更好的方法和更诚实的研究实践,我们也不应该期望任何一篇单独的研究文章能够为重要的会计问题提供结论性的答案。这样的知识进步需要一个高质量和独立的研究体系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Another Way Forward: Comments on Ohlson’s Critique of Empirical Accounting Research
Abstract Ohlson (2023. Empirical accounting seminars: Elephants in the room. Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium) laments that the evidentiary quality of empirical accounting research is low due to inappropriate methods and practices, leaving seminar attendees and readers unpersuaded by presented or published articles. He suggests that the norms of the profession prevent a public recognition and discussion of those issues, thereby sustaining the poor state of empirical accounting research. I agree that some current empirical approaches and norms seem to hamper progress toward more convincing research. I provide a practical suggestion to possibly improve the state of empirical accounting research. I caution though that even with better methods and more honest research practices, we should not expect that any individual research article can provide conclusive answers to important accounting questions. Such progress in knowledge requires a body of high-quality and independent research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信