管理媒体公司和行业:媒体管理有何特别之处?Gregory Ferrell Lowe和Charles Brown编辑

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Martin J. Riedl
{"title":"管理媒体公司和行业:媒体管理有何特别之处?Gregory Ferrell Lowe和Charles Brown编辑","authors":"Martin J. Riedl","doi":"10.1080/14241277.2017.1333756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This rich volume, edited and compiled by two former presidents of the European Media Management Association (EMMA)—Gregory F. Lowe, professor of media management at the University of Tampere in Finland, and Charles Brown, principal lecturer at the University of Westminster’s media management program—is an act of self-declaration. Brown and Lowe set out to contribute to the fermentation of the field—and start with a sobering analysis: Lowe writes that we cannot yet speak of a discipline, “because there are no characteristic theories or cohesiveness in a shared body of knowledge already proven to be both distinctive and important” (p. 12). Lowe and Brown host an exquisite selection of contributions, mainly by European and U.S.-based scholars, with the shared goal to help establish the discipline, by explicitly discussing the academic field itself and its premier venues, but also—quite extensively—by highlighting contemporary topics in media management research. The book is structured into four parts, each of which carries four chapters. The first section on scholarship and distinction assesses the status of the field. An overview study by Leona Achtenhagen and Bozena Mierzejewska, for example, compares different performance metrics of scholarly media business journals as a means to assess the maturity of the field. They conclude that too little theorizing has been done just yet. Another interesting contribution in this section is Brown’s elaboration of the usefulness of critical management studies for media management. He asks the relevant question of what it is that media management seeks to achieve in the first place. The book’s second section provides an overview about media governance in European settings. It investigates the questions of independence in public service media, of corporate social responsibility in the media, and, in Justin Schlosberg’s article, provides a plea for consideration of political economy perspectives in media management to analyze the crisis of institutional journalism—“structural decline and the funding crisis” (p. 167). Christian Nissen’s account and model of government influence in public service media is particularly insightful. As a former director general of the Danish public service broadcaster DR (Danish Broadcasting Corporation), Nissen concludes that the only sustainable solution to defend public service media against government influence is governments “being conceived accountable by their real owner: civil society” (p. 139). Section three emphasizes business models, entrepreneurship, and the distinct media economics that render a media management perspective worthwhile. Andreas Will, Dennis Brüntje and Britta Gossel’s chapter, for example, is a laudable proposal to emphasize entrepreneurship and new media business ventures in media management research, rather than the former focus on studying traditional mainstream media outlets. They criticize the field—rightfully—for being “still strongly influenced by perspectives inculcated in the era of mass media” (p. 204). The book’s fourth segment depicts the specifics of media as products and the audience. Philip Napoli, for instance, discusses the tripartite features of the audience as product, consumer and producer to illustrate “how media management is fundamentally different from management in other industries” (p. 272). Another chapter, penned by Annette Hill, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MEDIA MANAGEMENT 2018, VOL. 20, NO. 1, 78–79","PeriodicalId":45531,"journal":{"name":"JMM-International Journal on Media Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Media Firms and Industries: What’s So Special About Media Management? Edited by Gregory Ferrell Lowe and Charles Brown\",\"authors\":\"Martin J. Riedl\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14241277.2017.1333756\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This rich volume, edited and compiled by two former presidents of the European Media Management Association (EMMA)—Gregory F. Lowe, professor of media management at the University of Tampere in Finland, and Charles Brown, principal lecturer at the University of Westminster’s media management program—is an act of self-declaration. Brown and Lowe set out to contribute to the fermentation of the field—and start with a sobering analysis: Lowe writes that we cannot yet speak of a discipline, “because there are no characteristic theories or cohesiveness in a shared body of knowledge already proven to be both distinctive and important” (p. 12). Lowe and Brown host an exquisite selection of contributions, mainly by European and U.S.-based scholars, with the shared goal to help establish the discipline, by explicitly discussing the academic field itself and its premier venues, but also—quite extensively—by highlighting contemporary topics in media management research. The book is structured into four parts, each of which carries four chapters. The first section on scholarship and distinction assesses the status of the field. An overview study by Leona Achtenhagen and Bozena Mierzejewska, for example, compares different performance metrics of scholarly media business journals as a means to assess the maturity of the field. They conclude that too little theorizing has been done just yet. Another interesting contribution in this section is Brown’s elaboration of the usefulness of critical management studies for media management. He asks the relevant question of what it is that media management seeks to achieve in the first place. The book’s second section provides an overview about media governance in European settings. It investigates the questions of independence in public service media, of corporate social responsibility in the media, and, in Justin Schlosberg’s article, provides a plea for consideration of political economy perspectives in media management to analyze the crisis of institutional journalism—“structural decline and the funding crisis” (p. 167). Christian Nissen’s account and model of government influence in public service media is particularly insightful. As a former director general of the Danish public service broadcaster DR (Danish Broadcasting Corporation), Nissen concludes that the only sustainable solution to defend public service media against government influence is governments “being conceived accountable by their real owner: civil society” (p. 139). Section three emphasizes business models, entrepreneurship, and the distinct media economics that render a media management perspective worthwhile. Andreas Will, Dennis Brüntje and Britta Gossel’s chapter, for example, is a laudable proposal to emphasize entrepreneurship and new media business ventures in media management research, rather than the former focus on studying traditional mainstream media outlets. They criticize the field—rightfully—for being “still strongly influenced by perspectives inculcated in the era of mass media” (p. 204). The book’s fourth segment depicts the specifics of media as products and the audience. Philip Napoli, for instance, discusses the tripartite features of the audience as product, consumer and producer to illustrate “how media management is fundamentally different from management in other industries” (p. 272). Another chapter, penned by Annette Hill, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MEDIA MANAGEMENT 2018, VOL. 20, NO. 1, 78–79\",\"PeriodicalId\":45531,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMM-International Journal on Media Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMM-International Journal on Media Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1333756\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMM-International Journal on Media Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2017.1333756","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这本内容丰富的书是由欧洲媒体管理协会(EMMA)的两位前主席——芬兰坦佩雷大学媒体管理教授格雷戈里·f·洛和威斯敏斯特大学媒体管理课程首席讲师查尔斯·布朗编辑和编写的,是一种自我宣言。Brown和Lowe着手为这个领域的发酵做出贡献,并以一个发人深省的分析开始:Lowe写道,我们还不能谈论一个学科,“因为在一个已经被证明既独特又重要的共享知识体系中,没有特征理论或凝聚力”(第12页)。Lowe和Brown主持了一份精美的精选报告,主要来自欧洲和美国的学者,他们的共同目标是帮助建立这门学科,通过明确讨论学术领域本身及其主要场所,但也相当广泛地强调了媒体管理研究中的当代主题。全书分为四个部分,每个部分包含四章。第一部分关于奖学金和荣誉评估该领域的地位。例如,Leona Achtenhagen和Bozena Mierzejewska的一项概览研究比较了学术媒体商业期刊的不同绩效指标,作为评估该领域成熟度的一种手段。他们的结论是,目前的理论化研究还太少。本节中另一个有趣的贡献是布朗阐述了批判性管理研究对媒体管理的有用性。他提出了一个相关的问题:媒体管理首先要实现的目标是什么?本书的第二部分概述了欧洲环境下的媒体治理。它调查了公共服务媒体的独立性问题,媒体的企业社会责任问题,并在贾斯汀·施洛斯伯格(Justin Schlosberg)的文章中呼吁考虑媒体管理中的政治经济学观点,以分析机构新闻的危机——“结构性衰退和资金危机”(第167页)。克里斯蒂安·尼森对政府在公共服务媒体中的影响力的描述和模型特别有见地。作为丹麦公共服务广播公司DR(丹麦广播公司)的前总干事,Nissen得出结论,保护公共服务媒体免受政府影响的唯一可持续解决方案是政府“被其真正的所有者:公民社会视为负责任的”(第139页)。第三部分强调商业模式、企业家精神和独特的媒体经济学,它们使媒体管理的观点变得有价值。例如,Andreas Will、Dennis brnntje和Britta Gossel的章节提出了一个值得称赞的建议,即在媒体管理研究中强调企业家精神和新媒体商业风险,而不是前者专注于研究传统主流媒体。他们批评这个领域——正确的——“仍然受到大众传媒时代灌输的观点的强烈影响”(第204页)。书中的第四部分描述了媒介作为产品和受众的具体特征。例如,菲利普·那不勒斯(Philip Napoli)讨论了观众作为产品、消费者和生产者的三方特征,以说明“媒体管理与其他行业的管理有何根本不同”(第272页)。另一章,由安妮特·希尔撰写,国际媒体管理杂志2018年第20卷,第2期。1, 78 - 79
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Managing Media Firms and Industries: What’s So Special About Media Management? Edited by Gregory Ferrell Lowe and Charles Brown
This rich volume, edited and compiled by two former presidents of the European Media Management Association (EMMA)—Gregory F. Lowe, professor of media management at the University of Tampere in Finland, and Charles Brown, principal lecturer at the University of Westminster’s media management program—is an act of self-declaration. Brown and Lowe set out to contribute to the fermentation of the field—and start with a sobering analysis: Lowe writes that we cannot yet speak of a discipline, “because there are no characteristic theories or cohesiveness in a shared body of knowledge already proven to be both distinctive and important” (p. 12). Lowe and Brown host an exquisite selection of contributions, mainly by European and U.S.-based scholars, with the shared goal to help establish the discipline, by explicitly discussing the academic field itself and its premier venues, but also—quite extensively—by highlighting contemporary topics in media management research. The book is structured into four parts, each of which carries four chapters. The first section on scholarship and distinction assesses the status of the field. An overview study by Leona Achtenhagen and Bozena Mierzejewska, for example, compares different performance metrics of scholarly media business journals as a means to assess the maturity of the field. They conclude that too little theorizing has been done just yet. Another interesting contribution in this section is Brown’s elaboration of the usefulness of critical management studies for media management. He asks the relevant question of what it is that media management seeks to achieve in the first place. The book’s second section provides an overview about media governance in European settings. It investigates the questions of independence in public service media, of corporate social responsibility in the media, and, in Justin Schlosberg’s article, provides a plea for consideration of political economy perspectives in media management to analyze the crisis of institutional journalism—“structural decline and the funding crisis” (p. 167). Christian Nissen’s account and model of government influence in public service media is particularly insightful. As a former director general of the Danish public service broadcaster DR (Danish Broadcasting Corporation), Nissen concludes that the only sustainable solution to defend public service media against government influence is governments “being conceived accountable by their real owner: civil society” (p. 139). Section three emphasizes business models, entrepreneurship, and the distinct media economics that render a media management perspective worthwhile. Andreas Will, Dennis Brüntje and Britta Gossel’s chapter, for example, is a laudable proposal to emphasize entrepreneurship and new media business ventures in media management research, rather than the former focus on studying traditional mainstream media outlets. They criticize the field—rightfully—for being “still strongly influenced by perspectives inculcated in the era of mass media” (p. 204). The book’s fourth segment depicts the specifics of media as products and the audience. Philip Napoli, for instance, discusses the tripartite features of the audience as product, consumer and producer to illustrate “how media management is fundamentally different from management in other industries” (p. 272). Another chapter, penned by Annette Hill, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MEDIA MANAGEMENT 2018, VOL. 20, NO. 1, 78–79
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信