印尼现代背景下的《古兰经》解经方法——哈姆卡和古莱什·希哈卜三位一体思想研究

Suhuf Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI:10.22548/shf.v15i1.700
M. Muna
{"title":"印尼现代背景下的《古兰经》解经方法——哈姆卡和古莱什·希哈卜三位一体思想研究","authors":"M. Muna","doi":"10.22548/shf.v15i1.700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to analyze the modern interpretation method in Indonesia when understanding verses closely related to a concept outside Islamic religion. One of them is Trinity conception criticized by Quran on (5:73-75). Indonesian interpreters explain this passage in a variety of ways and the those are viewed dogmatically; using the method of quoting the Quran and Hadith, the opinion of the Salaf and Mutakallimn scholars. Hamka and Quraish Shihab made a different offer. Hamka in al-Azhar's interpretation tends to read the Quranic criticism using the Bible. Meanwhile, Shihab uses logical reasoning in reading these verses. These two things become new markers of the development of modern Indonesian commentary regarding with objectively reading trinity conception rather than by dogmatic sense. The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical. The results obtained from the two objects of this study are that the methods used by Hamka and Quraish Shihab are intertextuality and reasoning. The two methods allow wider acceptance of the interpretation product, including to non-Muslims.","PeriodicalId":32680,"journal":{"name":"Suhuf","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Method of Qur’anic Exegesis in Indonesian Modern Context: A Study of Hamka’s and Quraish Shihab’s Thoughts on Trinity\",\"authors\":\"M. Muna\",\"doi\":\"10.22548/shf.v15i1.700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to analyze the modern interpretation method in Indonesia when understanding verses closely related to a concept outside Islamic religion. One of them is Trinity conception criticized by Quran on (5:73-75). Indonesian interpreters explain this passage in a variety of ways and the those are viewed dogmatically; using the method of quoting the Quran and Hadith, the opinion of the Salaf and Mutakallimn scholars. Hamka and Quraish Shihab made a different offer. Hamka in al-Azhar's interpretation tends to read the Quranic criticism using the Bible. Meanwhile, Shihab uses logical reasoning in reading these verses. These two things become new markers of the development of modern Indonesian commentary regarding with objectively reading trinity conception rather than by dogmatic sense. The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical. The results obtained from the two objects of this study are that the methods used by Hamka and Quraish Shihab are intertextuality and reasoning. The two methods allow wider acceptance of the interpretation product, including to non-Muslims.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Suhuf\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Suhuf\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v15i1.700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suhuf","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22548/shf.v15i1.700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析印度尼西亚在理解与伊斯兰教以外的概念密切相关的经文时的现代解释方法。其中之一是被古兰经(5:73-75)批判的三位一体概念。印尼语诠释者用各种不同的方式来解释这段经文,这些方式被认为是教条式的;使用引用古兰经和圣训的方法,萨拉夫和穆塔卡林学者的意见。Hamka和Quraish Shihab提出了不同的条件。爱资哈尔的哈姆卡倾向于用圣经来解读古兰经的批评。同时,Shihab在阅读这些经文时使用逻辑推理。这两件事成为近代印尼语评注发展的新标志,是客观地解读三位一体的观念,而不是教条主义的观念。本研究采用描述分析方法。从两个研究对象得到的结果是,哈姆卡和古莱什·希哈布使用的方法是互文性和推理性的。这两种方法允许更广泛地接受翻译产品,包括非穆斯林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Method of Qur’anic Exegesis in Indonesian Modern Context: A Study of Hamka’s and Quraish Shihab’s Thoughts on Trinity
This paper aims to analyze the modern interpretation method in Indonesia when understanding verses closely related to a concept outside Islamic religion. One of them is Trinity conception criticized by Quran on (5:73-75). Indonesian interpreters explain this passage in a variety of ways and the those are viewed dogmatically; using the method of quoting the Quran and Hadith, the opinion of the Salaf and Mutakallimn scholars. Hamka and Quraish Shihab made a different offer. Hamka in al-Azhar's interpretation tends to read the Quranic criticism using the Bible. Meanwhile, Shihab uses logical reasoning in reading these verses. These two things become new markers of the development of modern Indonesian commentary regarding with objectively reading trinity conception rather than by dogmatic sense. The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical. The results obtained from the two objects of this study are that the methods used by Hamka and Quraish Shihab are intertextuality and reasoning. The two methods allow wider acceptance of the interpretation product, including to non-Muslims.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信