Marwa Abd El-Rahman Zidan, Mohamed H Nasef, Moataz Sabry, M. Shaheen
{"title":"局部环孢素:与泼尼松龙治疗疱疹性间质角膜炎的比较","authors":"Marwa Abd El-Rahman Zidan, Mohamed H Nasef, Moataz Sabry, M. Shaheen","doi":"10.22271/27069567.2023.v5.i2a.473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK) is an immune-mediated disease due to primary infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). It is now known about Cyclosporine A (CSA) that it selectively inhibits T-helper cell production of growth factors essential for B cell and cytotoxic T-cell differentiation and proliferation, so that the immune response which is considered the main cause of stromal lesion and opacity will be formed masking the transparent cornea affecting vision of the patients. The aim of our study was to compare between topical CSA ED versus Prednisolone ED in the treatment of HSK. Methods: The study is prospective, randomized, non-invasive and comparative on 30 eyes with HSK. Participants were divided randomly in numeric manner into 2 groups, each group included 15 eyes: Group (A): treated by topical CSA ED 0.4% and Group (B): treated by topical prednisolone acetate 1%. Comparison between both groups regarding effect on visual acuity, stromal haze, corneal edema, duration of healing, complications, HSV recurrence, vascularization and opacity was done. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in VA before treatment however, it was statistically significant lower in group B after treatment. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in grade of stromal infiltration before treatment but there was a statistically significant difference after treatment. Duration of healing was statistically significant lower in group B compared to group A Conclusions: According to our study, CSA ED (0.4%) is effective and comparable to corticosteroid in management of HSK. It may be less tolerable and take longer duration of action but it is superior to steroids as regard the effect on corneal opacity. It has the advantage to decrease corneal vascularization as well. Using corticosteroids is associated with complications especially in more complicated cases like thin cornea and epithelial defects. It causes disease recurrence and IOP elevation so CSA ED is recommended to be used in these cases.","PeriodicalId":13835,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Medicine","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical cyclosporine: A versus prednisolone in the treatment of herpetic stromal keratitis\",\"authors\":\"Marwa Abd El-Rahman Zidan, Mohamed H Nasef, Moataz Sabry, M. Shaheen\",\"doi\":\"10.22271/27069567.2023.v5.i2a.473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK) is an immune-mediated disease due to primary infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). It is now known about Cyclosporine A (CSA) that it selectively inhibits T-helper cell production of growth factors essential for B cell and cytotoxic T-cell differentiation and proliferation, so that the immune response which is considered the main cause of stromal lesion and opacity will be formed masking the transparent cornea affecting vision of the patients. The aim of our study was to compare between topical CSA ED versus Prednisolone ED in the treatment of HSK. Methods: The study is prospective, randomized, non-invasive and comparative on 30 eyes with HSK. Participants were divided randomly in numeric manner into 2 groups, each group included 15 eyes: Group (A): treated by topical CSA ED 0.4% and Group (B): treated by topical prednisolone acetate 1%. Comparison between both groups regarding effect on visual acuity, stromal haze, corneal edema, duration of healing, complications, HSV recurrence, vascularization and opacity was done. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in VA before treatment however, it was statistically significant lower in group B after treatment. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in grade of stromal infiltration before treatment but there was a statistically significant difference after treatment. Duration of healing was statistically significant lower in group B compared to group A Conclusions: According to our study, CSA ED (0.4%) is effective and comparable to corticosteroid in management of HSK. It may be less tolerable and take longer duration of action but it is superior to steroids as regard the effect on corneal opacity. It has the advantage to decrease corneal vascularization as well. Using corticosteroids is associated with complications especially in more complicated cases like thin cornea and epithelial defects. It causes disease recurrence and IOP elevation so CSA ED is recommended to be used in these cases.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Advanced Research in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22271/27069567.2023.v5.i2a.473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22271/27069567.2023.v5.i2a.473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:疱疹性间质角膜炎(HSK)是一种由单纯疱疹病毒(HSV)原发感染引起的免疫介导性疾病。目前已知环孢素A (Cyclosporine A, CSA)选择性地抑制t辅助细胞产生B细胞和细胞毒性t细胞分化和增殖所必需的生长因子,从而形成被认为是间质病变和混浊的主要原因的免疫反应,掩盖透明角膜,影响患者视力。本研究的目的是比较局部CSA ED与强的松龙ED治疗HSK的疗效。方法:采用前瞻性、随机、非侵入性、对照的方法对30只HSK患者进行研究。将受试者按数值随机分为2组,每组15只眼:A组:外用CSA ED 0.4%, B组:外用醋酸泼尼松龙1%。比较两组患者的视力、间质混浊、角膜水肿、愈合时间、并发症、HSV复发、血管化和混浊的影响。结果:两组治疗前VA差异无统计学意义,治疗后B组VA明显降低,差异有统计学意义。治疗前两组间质浸润程度差异无统计学意义,治疗后两组间质浸润程度差异有统计学意义。结论:根据我们的研究,CSA ED(0.4%)在HSK治疗中是有效的,与皮质类固醇相当。它的耐受性可能较差,作用时间也较长,但在对角膜混浊的影响方面,它优于类固醇。它还具有减少角膜血管化的优点。使用皮质类固醇与并发症有关,特别是在更复杂的情况下,如角膜薄和上皮缺陷。它会导致疾病复发和IOP升高,因此建议在这些病例中使用CSA ED。
Topical cyclosporine: A versus prednisolone in the treatment of herpetic stromal keratitis
Background: Herpetic stromal keratitis (HSK) is an immune-mediated disease due to primary infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV). It is now known about Cyclosporine A (CSA) that it selectively inhibits T-helper cell production of growth factors essential for B cell and cytotoxic T-cell differentiation and proliferation, so that the immune response which is considered the main cause of stromal lesion and opacity will be formed masking the transparent cornea affecting vision of the patients. The aim of our study was to compare between topical CSA ED versus Prednisolone ED in the treatment of HSK. Methods: The study is prospective, randomized, non-invasive and comparative on 30 eyes with HSK. Participants were divided randomly in numeric manner into 2 groups, each group included 15 eyes: Group (A): treated by topical CSA ED 0.4% and Group (B): treated by topical prednisolone acetate 1%. Comparison between both groups regarding effect on visual acuity, stromal haze, corneal edema, duration of healing, complications, HSV recurrence, vascularization and opacity was done. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in VA before treatment however, it was statistically significant lower in group B after treatment. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in grade of stromal infiltration before treatment but there was a statistically significant difference after treatment. Duration of healing was statistically significant lower in group B compared to group A Conclusions: According to our study, CSA ED (0.4%) is effective and comparable to corticosteroid in management of HSK. It may be less tolerable and take longer duration of action but it is superior to steroids as regard the effect on corneal opacity. It has the advantage to decrease corneal vascularization as well. Using corticosteroids is associated with complications especially in more complicated cases like thin cornea and epithelial defects. It causes disease recurrence and IOP elevation so CSA ED is recommended to be used in these cases.